Unraveling the Gordian knot of coronary pressure-flow autoregulation

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Johnathan D. Tune , Cooper M. Warne , Salman I. Essajee , Selina M. Tucker , C. Alberto Figueroa , Gregory M. Dick , Daniel A. Beard
{"title":"Unraveling the Gordian knot of coronary pressure-flow autoregulation","authors":"Johnathan D. Tune ,&nbsp;Cooper M. Warne ,&nbsp;Salman I. Essajee ,&nbsp;Selina M. Tucker ,&nbsp;C. Alberto Figueroa ,&nbsp;Gregory M. Dick ,&nbsp;Daniel A. Beard","doi":"10.1016/j.yjmcc.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The coronary circulation has the inherent ability to maintain myocardial perfusion constant over a wide range of perfusion pressures. The phenomenon of pressure-flow autoregulation is crucial in response to flow-limiting atherosclerotic lesions which diminish coronary driving pressure and increase risk of myocardial ischemia and infarction. Despite well over half a century of devoted research, understanding of the mechanisms responsible for autoregulation remains one of the most fundamental and contested questions in the field today. The purpose of this review is to highlight current knowledge regarding the complex interrelationship between the pathways and mechanisms proposed to dictate the degree of coronary pressure-flow autoregulation. Our group recently likened the intertwined nature of the essential determinants of coronary flow control to the symbolically unsolvable “Gordian knot”. To further efforts to unravel the autoregulatory “knot”, we consider recent challenges to the local metabolic and myogenic hypotheses and the complicated dynamic structural and functional heterogeneity unique to the heart and coronary circulation. Additional consideration is given to interrogation of putative mediators, role of K<sup>+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup> channels, and recent insights from computational modeling studies. Improved understanding of how specific vasoactive mediators, pathways, and underlying disease states influence coronary pressure-flow relations stands to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality for what remains the leading cause of death worldwide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Pages 82-91"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002228282400052X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronary circulation has the inherent ability to maintain myocardial perfusion constant over a wide range of perfusion pressures. The phenomenon of pressure-flow autoregulation is crucial in response to flow-limiting atherosclerotic lesions which diminish coronary driving pressure and increase risk of myocardial ischemia and infarction. Despite well over half a century of devoted research, understanding of the mechanisms responsible for autoregulation remains one of the most fundamental and contested questions in the field today. The purpose of this review is to highlight current knowledge regarding the complex interrelationship between the pathways and mechanisms proposed to dictate the degree of coronary pressure-flow autoregulation. Our group recently likened the intertwined nature of the essential determinants of coronary flow control to the symbolically unsolvable “Gordian knot”. To further efforts to unravel the autoregulatory “knot”, we consider recent challenges to the local metabolic and myogenic hypotheses and the complicated dynamic structural and functional heterogeneity unique to the heart and coronary circulation. Additional consideration is given to interrogation of putative mediators, role of K+ and Ca2+ channels, and recent insights from computational modeling studies. Improved understanding of how specific vasoactive mediators, pathways, and underlying disease states influence coronary pressure-flow relations stands to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality for what remains the leading cause of death worldwide.

解开冠状动脉压力-血流自动调节的死结
冠状动脉循环具有在广泛的灌注压力范围内保持心肌灌注恒定的固有能力。动脉粥样硬化病变会降低冠状动脉的驱动压力,增加心肌缺血和梗死的风险,而压力-流量自动调节现象对于应对这种病变至关重要。尽管经过半个多世纪的潜心研究,对自动调节机制的理解仍然是当今该领域最基本和最有争议的问题之一。这篇综述的目的是强调目前关于冠状动脉压力-血流自动调节程度的途径和机制之间复杂的相互关系的知识。我们的研究小组最近将冠状动脉血流控制的基本决定因素相互交织的性质比喻为象征性的无法解开的 "戈尔迪之结"。为了进一步努力解开自动调节的 "结",我们考虑了最近对局部代谢和肌源性假说的挑战,以及心脏和冠状动脉循环特有的复杂动态结构和功能异质性。此外,我们还考虑了对假定介质的询问、K+ 和 Ca2+ 通道的作用以及计算模型研究的最新见解。进一步了解特定的血管活性介质、途径和潜在的疾病状态如何影响冠状动脉压力-流量关系,将大大降低冠状动脉疾病的发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology publishes work advancing knowledge of the mechanisms responsible for both normal and diseased cardiovascular function. To this end papers are published in all relevant areas. These include (but are not limited to): structural biology; genetics; proteomics; morphology; stem cells; molecular biology; metabolism; biophysics; bioengineering; computational modeling and systems analysis; electrophysiology; pharmacology and physiology. Papers are encouraged with both basic and translational approaches. The journal is directed not only to basic scientists but also to clinical cardiologists who wish to follow the rapidly advancing frontiers of basic knowledge of the heart and circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信