Using nephropathy as an outcome to determine the HbA1c diagnostic threshold for type 2 diabetes

IF 4.3 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Alexandra E. Butler , Steven C. Hunt , Eric S. Kilpatrick
{"title":"Using nephropathy as an outcome to determine the HbA1c diagnostic threshold for type 2 diabetes","authors":"Alexandra E. Butler ,&nbsp;Steven C. Hunt ,&nbsp;Eric S. Kilpatrick","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2024.103005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) diagnostic threshold for type 2 diabetes (T2D) of 6.5 % (48 mmol/mol) was based on the prevalence of retinopathy found in populations not known to have T2D. It is unclear if nephropathy has a similar HbA1c threshold, partly because it is a rarer complication of early diabetes. This cohort study investigated a very high diabetes prevalence population to determine if a better diagnostic HbA1c value can be established for predicting nephropathy rather than retinopathy in subjects without T2D.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The urine albumin:creatinine ratios (UACRs) of 2920 healthy individuals from the Qatar Biobank who had an HbA1c ≥ 5.6 %. were studied. Nephropathy was defined as a UACR≥30 mg/g and its prediction by HbA1c was assessed using cut-points ranging from 5.7 to 7.0 % to dichotomize high from low HbA1c.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Although there was a significant trend for an increased prevalence of abnormal UACR as the HbA1c threshold increased (p &lt; 0.01), significance was due mostly to subjects with HbA1c ≥ 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol). The odds ratios for abnormal UACR were similar over the 5.7–6.9 % HbA1c threshold range, with a narrow odds ratio range of 1.2–1.6. Utilizing area-under-receiver-operating characteristic curves, no HbA1c threshold &lt;7.0 % was identified as the best predictor of nephropathy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Even in a population with a high prevalence of known and unknown diabetes, no HbA1c threshold &lt;7.0 % could be found predicting an increased prevalence of nephropathy. This means there is not a requirement to change the existing retinopathy-based HbA1c threshold of 6.5 % to also accommodate diabetes nephropathy risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48252,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402124000663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) diagnostic threshold for type 2 diabetes (T2D) of 6.5 % (48 mmol/mol) was based on the prevalence of retinopathy found in populations not known to have T2D. It is unclear if nephropathy has a similar HbA1c threshold, partly because it is a rarer complication of early diabetes. This cohort study investigated a very high diabetes prevalence population to determine if a better diagnostic HbA1c value can be established for predicting nephropathy rather than retinopathy in subjects without T2D.

Methods

The urine albumin:creatinine ratios (UACRs) of 2920 healthy individuals from the Qatar Biobank who had an HbA1c ≥ 5.6 %. were studied. Nephropathy was defined as a UACR≥30 mg/g and its prediction by HbA1c was assessed using cut-points ranging from 5.7 to 7.0 % to dichotomize high from low HbA1c.

Results

Although there was a significant trend for an increased prevalence of abnormal UACR as the HbA1c threshold increased (p < 0.01), significance was due mostly to subjects with HbA1c ≥ 7.0 % (53 mmol/mol). The odds ratios for abnormal UACR were similar over the 5.7–6.9 % HbA1c threshold range, with a narrow odds ratio range of 1.2–1.6. Utilizing area-under-receiver-operating characteristic curves, no HbA1c threshold <7.0 % was identified as the best predictor of nephropathy.

Conclusion

Even in a population with a high prevalence of known and unknown diabetes, no HbA1c threshold <7.0 % could be found predicting an increased prevalence of nephropathy. This means there is not a requirement to change the existing retinopathy-based HbA1c threshold of 6.5 % to also accommodate diabetes nephropathy risk.

将肾病作为确定 2 型糖尿病 HbA1c 诊断阈值的结果
目标2型糖尿病(T2D)的血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)诊断阈值为6.5%(48 mmol/mol),其依据是在未发现T2D的人群中发现的视网膜病变患病率。目前还不清楚肾病是否也有类似的 HbA1c 临界值,部分原因是肾病是早期糖尿病的一种罕见并发症。这项队列研究对糖尿病发病率非常高的人群进行了调查,以确定是否可以建立一个更好的诊断 HbA1c 值,用于预测未患 T2D 的受试者的肾病而非视网膜病变。方法研究了卡塔尔生物库中 HbA1c ≥ 5.6 % 的 2920 名健康人的尿白蛋白:肌酐比率(UACRs)。结果虽然随着 HbA1c 临界值的增加,UACR 异常发生率呈显著增加趋势(p <0.01),但显著性主要来自 HbA1c≥7.0 %(53 mmol/mol)的受试者。在 5.7-6.9 % HbA1c 临界值范围内,UACR 异常的几率相似,几率范围较窄,为 1.2-1.6。结论即使在已知和未知糖尿病患病率较高的人群中,也没有发现任何 HbA1c 临界值 <7.0 % 可以预测肾病患病率的增加。这意味着不需要改变现有的基于视网膜病变的 HbA1c 临界值 6.5%,以同时考虑糖尿病肾病风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews is the official journal of DiabetesIndia. It aims to provide a global platform for healthcare professionals, diabetes educators, and other stakeholders to submit their research on diabetes care. Types of Publications: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, letters to the Editor, and expert comments. Reviews and mini-reviews are particularly welcomed for areas within endocrinology undergoing rapid changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信