Measurement of greenhouse gas fluxes in agricultural soils with a flexible, open-design automated system

IF 5.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Soil Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.5194/egusphere-2024-804
Samuel Franco-Luesma, María Alonso-Ayuso, Benjamin Wolf, Borja Latorre, Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes
{"title":"Measurement of greenhouse gas fluxes in agricultural soils with a flexible, open-design automated system","authors":"Samuel Franco-Luesma, María Alonso-Ayuso, Benjamin Wolf, Borja Latorre, Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes","doi":"10.5194/egusphere-2024-804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Over the last decades and due to the current climate change situation, the study of the impacts of human activities on climate has reached great importance, being agriculture one of the main sources of soil greenhouse gas. There are different techniques to quantify the soil gas fluxes, such as micrometeorological techniques or chamber techniques, being the last one capable to assess different treatment at the same site. Manual chambers are the most common one. However, due to the low sampling frequency, this approach cannot resolve short-term emission events, like fertilization or rewetting. For this reason, automated chamber systems are an opportunity to improve soil gas flux determination, but their distribution is still scarce due to the cost and challenging technical implementation. The objective of this study was to develop an automated chamber system for agricultural systems under Mediterranean conditions and compare measured GHG flux rates to those derived using manual chambers. A comparison between manual and automated chamber systems was conducted to evaluate the soil gas fluxes obtained by the automated system. Moreover, over a period of one month the soil gas fluxes were determined by both systems to compare their capabilities to capture the temporal variability of soil gas emissions. The automated system reported higher soil GHG fluxes compared to the manual chamber system. Additionally, the higher sampling frequency of the automated chamber system allowed for the capture of daily flux variations, resulting in a more accurate estimation of cumulative soil gas emissions. The study emphasises the importance of chamber dimension and shape, as well as sampling frequency, in the development of chamber systems, especially when using the manual chamber system.","PeriodicalId":48610,"journal":{"name":"Soil","volume":"163 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Over the last decades and due to the current climate change situation, the study of the impacts of human activities on climate has reached great importance, being agriculture one of the main sources of soil greenhouse gas. There are different techniques to quantify the soil gas fluxes, such as micrometeorological techniques or chamber techniques, being the last one capable to assess different treatment at the same site. Manual chambers are the most common one. However, due to the low sampling frequency, this approach cannot resolve short-term emission events, like fertilization or rewetting. For this reason, automated chamber systems are an opportunity to improve soil gas flux determination, but their distribution is still scarce due to the cost and challenging technical implementation. The objective of this study was to develop an automated chamber system for agricultural systems under Mediterranean conditions and compare measured GHG flux rates to those derived using manual chambers. A comparison between manual and automated chamber systems was conducted to evaluate the soil gas fluxes obtained by the automated system. Moreover, over a period of one month the soil gas fluxes were determined by both systems to compare their capabilities to capture the temporal variability of soil gas emissions. The automated system reported higher soil GHG fluxes compared to the manual chamber system. Additionally, the higher sampling frequency of the automated chamber system allowed for the capture of daily flux variations, resulting in a more accurate estimation of cumulative soil gas emissions. The study emphasises the importance of chamber dimension and shape, as well as sampling frequency, in the development of chamber systems, especially when using the manual chamber system.
利用灵活、开放式设计的自动化系统测量农业土壤中的温室气体通量
摘要在过去的几十年里,由于当前的气候变化形势,研究人类活动对气候的影响已变得非常重要,而农业是土壤温室气体的主要来源之一。量化土壤气体通量的技术多种多样,如微气象技术或室技术,其中最后一种技术能够评估同一地点的不同处理方法。最常见的是手动试验箱。然而,由于采样频率低,这种方法无法解决施肥或复湿等短期排放事件。因此,自动监测室系统是改善土壤气体通量测定的一个机会,但由于成本和技术实施的挑战性,其分布仍然稀少。本研究的目的是为地中海条件下的农业系统开发一种自动室系统,并将测得的温室气体通量率与使用手动室得出的通量率进行比较。研究人员对手动室系统和自动室系统进行了比较,以评估自动系统获得的土壤气体通量。此外,两个系统都测定了一个月的土壤气体通量,以比较它们捕捉土壤气体排放的时间变化的能力。与手动室系统相比,自动系统报告的土壤温室气体通量更高。此外,自动化箱式系统的采样频率更高,可以捕捉到每天的通量变化,从而更准确地估算出土壤气体的累积排放量。这项研究强调了试验室尺寸和形状以及采样频率在试验室系统开发中的重要性,尤其是在使用手动试验室系统时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil
Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: SOIL is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research in the field of soil system sciences. SOIL is at the interface between the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. SOIL publishes scientific research that contributes to understanding the soil system and its interaction with humans and the entire Earth system. The scope of the journal includes all topics that fall within the study of soil science as a discipline, with an emphasis on studies that integrate soil science with other sciences (hydrology, agronomy, socio-economics, health sciences, atmospheric sciences, etc.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信