Is the use of gonad protection protectors necessary during infants chest radiography?

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

To compare gonad doses with and without a gonad protector and to optimize the use of gonadal protectors in infants thorax radiography.

Materials and methods

Two pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms are used: an X-ray system for KXO-50SS/DRX-3724HD, and a digital radiography system for CALNEO Smart C12, with and without a gonad protector during infants thorax radiography. A real time skin dosimeter is placed on the X-ray system, and a real time skin dosimeter is inserted on the front side of the mammary gland, the front and back sides of the true pelvis level, and on the ovaries and testes. The X-ray system is irradiated 15 times using phantoms with and without a gonad protector. The measured entrance patient doses values of for the real time skin dosimeter are compared for each phantom, with and without the gonad protector.

Results

The medium of measured entrance patient doses values for front side dose of the true pelvis level with and without the protector are 10.00 and 5.00 μGy at newborn, and 10.00 and 0.00μGy at one year, respectively. The medium of measured entrance patient doses values for the back side dose of the true pelvis level with and without the protector are 0.00 and 0.00 μGy at both newborn one year, respectively. The measured entrance patient doses cannot be detected in the ovaries and testes with or without the protector. No significant differences are observed in the measured entrance patient doses values for the front and back side doses of the pelvis, ovaries, and testes at newborn and one year, with and without the protector (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

No significant difference was observed in gonad dose measurements with and without the gonad protector during infants chest radiography. We believe that gonadal protector wearing is not necessary.