Vaccination coverage during pregnancy and factors associated with refusal of recommended vaccinations: An Italian cross sectional study

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Viola Seravalli , Irene Romualdi , Oumaima Ammar , Chiara De Blasi , Sara Boccalini , Angela Bechini , Mariarosaria Di Tommaso
{"title":"Vaccination coverage during pregnancy and factors associated with refusal of recommended vaccinations: An Italian cross sectional study","authors":"Viola Seravalli ,&nbsp;Irene Romualdi ,&nbsp;Oumaima Ammar ,&nbsp;Chiara De Blasi ,&nbsp;Sara Boccalini ,&nbsp;Angela Bechini ,&nbsp;Mariarosaria Di Tommaso","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The vaccines recommended during pregnancy are the Tdap, the influenza vaccine, and, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the vaccine against COVID-19. This survey aimed at determining vaccination coverage among pregnant women and adverse events, reasons for vaccine refusal, and factors associated with vaccine uptake.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-center cross-sectional study was conducted on women who delivered between March and April 2022 at Careggi University Hospital in Florence, Italy. Information on the vaccinations (Tdap, influenza and COVID-19) received during pregnancy were collected through in-person interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 307 enrolled women (response rate 99 % on a study population of 310 eligible women), 74 % of patients were vaccinated with Tdap, 82 % against COVID-19, and only 33 % against influenza. Vaccination coverage for Tdap and COVID-19 was significantly higher among Italian than foreign patients (80 % vs 51 %, p &lt; 0.001 and 86 % vs 69 %, p = 0.002, respectively), and for Tdap was higher among patients followed in the private vs public care setting. The main reasons behind refusal of vaccinations were low risk perception of influenza (41 %), insufficient information received from the prenatal care provider regarding the Tdap (35 %), and, for the COVID-19, fear of vaccine side effects (64 %), and concerns about effects on the fetus (70 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Adherence to the influenza vaccine was low because of reduced perception of the disease risks. The difference in vaccination coverage between Italians and foreigners is an example of healthcare disparity. Better information provided to patients about vaccines’ efficacy and safety is advisable to increase acceptance of recommended vaccines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136224000561/pdfft?md5=cc11ce4a437202d1ca875f1b1c9f4925&pid=1-s2.0-S2590136224000561-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136224000561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The vaccines recommended during pregnancy are the Tdap, the influenza vaccine, and, during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the vaccine against COVID-19. This survey aimed at determining vaccination coverage among pregnant women and adverse events, reasons for vaccine refusal, and factors associated with vaccine uptake.

Methods

A single-center cross-sectional study was conducted on women who delivered between March and April 2022 at Careggi University Hospital in Florence, Italy. Information on the vaccinations (Tdap, influenza and COVID-19) received during pregnancy were collected through in-person interviews.

Results

Among 307 enrolled women (response rate 99 % on a study population of 310 eligible women), 74 % of patients were vaccinated with Tdap, 82 % against COVID-19, and only 33 % against influenza. Vaccination coverage for Tdap and COVID-19 was significantly higher among Italian than foreign patients (80 % vs 51 %, p < 0.001 and 86 % vs 69 %, p = 0.002, respectively), and for Tdap was higher among patients followed in the private vs public care setting. The main reasons behind refusal of vaccinations were low risk perception of influenza (41 %), insufficient information received from the prenatal care provider regarding the Tdap (35 %), and, for the COVID-19, fear of vaccine side effects (64 %), and concerns about effects on the fetus (70 %).

Conclusions

Adherence to the influenza vaccine was low because of reduced perception of the disease risks. The difference in vaccination coverage between Italians and foreigners is an example of healthcare disparity. Better information provided to patients about vaccines’ efficacy and safety is advisable to increase acceptance of recommended vaccines.

孕期疫苗接种覆盖率与拒绝接受推荐疫苗接种的相关因素:一项意大利横断面研究
背景 怀孕期间推荐接种的疫苗有百白破疫苗、流感疫苗以及在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间接种的 COVID-19 疫苗。这项调查旨在确定孕妇的疫苗接种覆盖率、不良事件、拒绝接种疫苗的原因以及与疫苗接种率相关的因素。方法 对 2022 年 3 月至 4 月期间在意大利佛罗伦萨 Careggi 大学医院分娩的妇女进行了一项单中心横断面研究。结果在307名登记的产妇中(310名符合条件的产妇中回复率为99%),74%的患者接种了百白破疫苗,82%的患者接种了COVID-19疫苗,只有33%的患者接种了流感疫苗。意大利患者的百白破疫苗和 COVID-19 疫苗接种率明显高于外国患者(分别为 80% vs 51%,p < 0.001 和 86% vs 69%,p = 0.002),在私立医疗机构就诊的患者的百白破疫苗接种率高于公立医疗机构。拒绝接种的主要原因是对流感风险认识不足(41%)、产前保健提供者提供的有关百白破疫苗的信息不足(35%),以及对 COVID-19 疫苗副作用的恐惧(64%)和对胎儿影响的担忧(70%)。意大利人和外国人在疫苗接种覆盖率上的差异是医疗保健差异的一个例子。最好向患者提供更多有关疫苗有效性和安全性的信息,以提高对推荐疫苗的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信