Outcomes of 6-mm diameter fully covered self-expandable metal stents for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1002/deo2.360
Hiroki Nakagawa, Tsuyoshi Takeda, Takeshi Okamoto, Takafumi Mie, Akiyoshi Kasuga, Takashi Sasaki, Masato Ozaka, Takahisa Matsuda, Yoshinori Igarashi, Naoki Sasahira
{"title":"Outcomes of 6-mm diameter fully covered self-expandable metal stents for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer","authors":"Hiroki Nakagawa,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Takeda,&nbsp;Takeshi Okamoto,&nbsp;Takafumi Mie,&nbsp;Akiyoshi Kasuga,&nbsp;Takashi Sasaki,&nbsp;Masato Ozaka,&nbsp;Takahisa Matsuda,&nbsp;Yoshinori Igarashi,&nbsp;Naoki Sasahira","doi":"10.1002/deo2.360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>10-mm self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are commonly used for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer. However, smaller diameter SEMSs have attracted attention with the attempt to reduce stent-related adverse events (AEs).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed consecutive borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) placement from April 2015 to May 2023. The primary outcome was stent-related non-event rate (NER), which was defined as the rate of completion of surgery without developing any preoperative events (recurrent biliary obstruction [RBO] or stent-related AEs). Secondary outcomes included stent-related AEs, causes of RBO, and cumulative incidence of RBO. Risk factors for pancreatitis, RBO, and stent migration were also examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 76 patients were included (6-mm group: 23; 10-mm group: 53). Stent-related NER (57% vs. 64%, <i>p</i> = 0.610), stent-related AEs (4% vs. 15%, <i>p</i> = 0.263), overall RBO rates (39% vs. 23%, <i>p</i> = 0.168), cumulative incidence of RBO (hazard ratio, 2.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.95–5.25; <i>p</i> = 0.065) were not significantly different between the two groups. Tumor involvement of the pancreatic duct was identified as a risk-reducing factor for pancreatitis, while an FCSEMS diameter of 6 mm was not identified as a risk factor for RBO and stent migration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Stent-related NER was not significantly affected by FCSEMS diameter. Further studies are needed to confirm the usefulness of 6-mm diameter FCSEMS for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.360","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

10-mm self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) are commonly used for preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer. However, smaller diameter SEMSs have attracted attention with the attempt to reduce stent-related adverse events (AEs).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive borderline resectable pancreatic cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) placement from April 2015 to May 2023. The primary outcome was stent-related non-event rate (NER), which was defined as the rate of completion of surgery without developing any preoperative events (recurrent biliary obstruction [RBO] or stent-related AEs). Secondary outcomes included stent-related AEs, causes of RBO, and cumulative incidence of RBO. Risk factors for pancreatitis, RBO, and stent migration were also examined.

Results

A total of 76 patients were included (6-mm group: 23; 10-mm group: 53). Stent-related NER (57% vs. 64%, p = 0.610), stent-related AEs (4% vs. 15%, p = 0.263), overall RBO rates (39% vs. 23%, p = 0.168), cumulative incidence of RBO (hazard ratio, 2.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.95–5.25; p = 0.065) were not significantly different between the two groups. Tumor involvement of the pancreatic duct was identified as a risk-reducing factor for pancreatitis, while an FCSEMS diameter of 6 mm was not identified as a risk factor for RBO and stent migration.

Conclusions

Stent-related NER was not significantly affected by FCSEMS diameter. Further studies are needed to confirm the usefulness of 6-mm diameter FCSEMS for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Abstract Image

直径 6 毫米全覆盖自膨胀金属支架用于胰腺癌术前胆道引流的效果
背景 10 毫米自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)常用于胰腺癌术前胆道引流。然而,为了减少与支架相关的不良事件(AEs),直径更小的 SEMS 引起了人们的关注。 方法 我们回顾性分析了 2015 年 4 月至 2023 年 5 月期间接受新辅助治疗和全覆盖 SEMS(FCSEMS)置入术的连续边界可切除胰腺癌患者。主要结局是支架相关非事件发生率(NER),即完成手术后未发生任何术前事件(复发性胆道梗阻 [RBO] 或支架相关 AEs)的比率。次要结果包括支架相关的AE、RBO的原因和RBO的累积发生率。此外,还研究了胰腺炎、RBO和支架移位的风险因素。 结果 共纳入 76 例患者(6 毫米组:23 例;10 毫米组:53 例)。两组患者的支架相关 NER(57% vs. 64%,p = 0.610)、支架相关 AE(4% vs. 15%,p = 0.263)、总体 RBO 发生率(39% vs. 23%,p = 0.168)、RBO 累积发生率(危险比,2.24;95% 置信区间,0.95-5.25;p = 0.065)无显著差异。肿瘤累及胰管被确定为胰腺炎的风险降低因素,而 FCSEMS 直径为 6 毫米未被确定为 RBO 和支架移位的风险因素。 结论 支架相关 NER 受 FCSEMS 直径的影响不大。需要进一步研究证实直径为 6 毫米的 FCSEMS 是否适用于边缘可切除胰腺癌患者的术前胆道引流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信