Effects of acceptance and commitment therapy-based intervention on fatigue interference and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer: A randomised controlled trial

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Huiyuan Li , Cho Lee Wong , Xiaohuan Jin , Yuen Yu Chong , Marques Shek Nam Ng
{"title":"Effects of acceptance and commitment therapy-based intervention on fatigue interference and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer: A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Huiyuan Li ,&nbsp;Cho Lee Wong ,&nbsp;Xiaohuan Jin ,&nbsp;Yuen Yu Chong ,&nbsp;Marques Shek Nam Ng","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cancer-related fatigue is common in patients with advanced lung cancer, persistently interfering with their health-related quality of life. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may effectively reduce fatigue interference and improve health-related quality of life in the advanced lung cancer population. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an ACT-based intervention on fatigue interference and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An assessor-blinded, two-arm randomised controlled trial with 160 patients with advanced lung cancer was conducted. Participants were randomly allocated into either a four-week ACT-based intervention group (n = 80) or usual care control group (n = 80). The intervention consisted of a face-to-face session and three video-conferencing-based sessions and was delivered on an individual basis. The primary outcomes were fatigue interference and health-related quality of life. The secondary outcomes included cancer-related fatigue, depression and anxiety, cancer-specific distress, and activity level. Changes in psychological flexibility (PF), experiential avoidance, and cognitive fusion were also evaluated. Outcomes were measured at baselines (T0), one-week post-intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2). The intervention effects were assessed using generalised estimating equation models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Compared with the control group, the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in fatigue interference (T1: <em>β</em> = −0.50, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; T2: <em>β</em> = −0.16, <em>p</em> = 0.007), health-related quality of life (T1: <em>β</em> = 16.01, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; T2: <em>β</em> = 11.21, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), depression (T1: <em>β</em> = −0.32, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and anxiety (T1: <em>β</em> = −0.20, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), cancer-specific distress (T1: <em>β</em> = −7.37, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; T2: <em>β</em> = −8.00, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), activity level (intensity, T1: <em>β</em> = 3.24, <em>p</em> = 0.004; T2: <em>β</em> = 2.61, <em>p</em> = 0.020; frequency, T1: <em>β</em> = 2.44, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; T2: <em>β</em> = 1.96, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; duration, T1: <em>β</em> = 1.36, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), PF (T1: <em>β</em> = 5.54, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; T2: <em>β</em> = 8.63, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), experiential avoidance (T1: <em>β</em> = −7.70, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; T2: <em>β</em> = −10.07, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and cognitive fusion (T2: <em>β</em> = −3.31, <em>p</em> = 0.007). The changes in experiential avoidance at one-week post-intervention mediated the effects of ACT on reducing cancer-specific distress (<em>β</em> = −7.40, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>β</em> = −3.68, 95%CI, −5.77 to −1.58) and promoting HRQoL (<em>β</em> = 11.15, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>β</em> = 5.49, 95%CI, 3.09 to 8.31) at three-month follow-up. The changes in PF at one-week post-intervention mediated the effect of ACT on HRQoL (<em>β</em> = 11.15, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>β</em> = 2.25, 95%CI, 0.66 to 4.19) at three-month follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ACT-based intervention can effectively reduce fatigue interference and improve health-related quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer. The intervention can be integrated into palliative care within the cancer system to contribute to the well-being of patients with advanced cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 100758"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144724000383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cancer-related fatigue is common in patients with advanced lung cancer, persistently interfering with their health-related quality of life. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may effectively reduce fatigue interference and improve health-related quality of life in the advanced lung cancer population. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an ACT-based intervention on fatigue interference and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Methods

An assessor-blinded, two-arm randomised controlled trial with 160 patients with advanced lung cancer was conducted. Participants were randomly allocated into either a four-week ACT-based intervention group (n = 80) or usual care control group (n = 80). The intervention consisted of a face-to-face session and three video-conferencing-based sessions and was delivered on an individual basis. The primary outcomes were fatigue interference and health-related quality of life. The secondary outcomes included cancer-related fatigue, depression and anxiety, cancer-specific distress, and activity level. Changes in psychological flexibility (PF), experiential avoidance, and cognitive fusion were also evaluated. Outcomes were measured at baselines (T0), one-week post-intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2). The intervention effects were assessed using generalised estimating equation models.

Results

Compared with the control group, the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in fatigue interference (T1: β = −0.50, p < 0.001; T2: β = −0.16, p = 0.007), health-related quality of life (T1: β = 16.01, p < 0.001; T2: β = 11.21, p < 0.001), depression (T1: β = −0.32, p < 0.001) and anxiety (T1: β = −0.20, p < 0.001), cancer-specific distress (T1: β = −7.37, p < 0.001; T2: β = −8.00, p < 0.001), activity level (intensity, T1: β = 3.24, p = 0.004; T2: β = 2.61, p = 0.020; frequency, T1: β = 2.44, p < 0.001; T2: β = 1.96, p < 0.001; duration, T1: β = 1.36, p < 0.001), PF (T1: β = 5.54, p < 0.001; T2: β = 8.63, p < 0.001), experiential avoidance (T1: β = −7.70, p < 0.001; T2: β = −10.07, p < 0.001), and cognitive fusion (T2: β = −3.31, p = 0.007). The changes in experiential avoidance at one-week post-intervention mediated the effects of ACT on reducing cancer-specific distress (β = −7.40, p < 0.001; β = −3.68, 95%CI, −5.77 to −1.58) and promoting HRQoL (β = 11.15, p < 0.001; β = 5.49, 95%CI, 3.09 to 8.31) at three-month follow-up. The changes in PF at one-week post-intervention mediated the effect of ACT on HRQoL (β = 11.15, p < 0.001; β = 2.25, 95%CI, 0.66 to 4.19) at three-month follow-up.

Conclusions

ACT-based intervention can effectively reduce fatigue interference and improve health-related quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer. The intervention can be integrated into palliative care within the cancer system to contribute to the well-being of patients with advanced cancer.

基于接纳与承诺疗法的干预对晚期肺癌患者疲劳干扰和健康相关生活质量的影响:随机对照试验
背景晚期肺癌患者中与癌症相关的疲劳很常见,持续干扰他们与健康相关的生活质量。接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)可有效减少晚期肺癌患者的疲劳干扰,改善其健康相关生活质量。本研究旨在评估以接纳与承诺疗法为基础的干预对晚期肺癌患者疲劳干扰和健康相关生活质量的影响。方法:研究人员对 160 名晚期肺癌患者进行了评估者盲法双臂随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到为期四周的ACT干预组(80人)或常规护理对照组(80人)。干预措施包括一次面对面治疗和三次基于视频会议的治疗,以个人为单位实施。主要结果是疲劳干扰和与健康相关的生活质量。次要结果包括与癌症相关的疲劳、抑郁和焦虑、癌症特异性困扰以及活动水平。此外,还评估了心理灵活性(PF)、体验性回避和认知融合的变化。结果在基线(T0)、干预后一周(T1)和 3 个月随访(T2)时进行测量。结果与对照组相比,干预组在疲劳干扰方面有显著改善(T1:β = -0.50, p < 0.001; T2: β = -0.16, p = 0.007)、健康相关生活质量(T1: β = 16.01, p < 0.001; T2: β = 11.21, p < 0.001)、抑郁(T1: β = -0.32, p < 0.001)和焦虑(T1: β = -0.20, p < 0.001)、癌症特异性困扰(T1:β = -7.37,p <;0.001;T2:β = -8.00,p <;0.001)、活动水平(强度,T1:β = 3.24,p = 0.004;T2:β = 2.61,p = 0.020;频率,T1:β = 2.44,p <;0.001;T2:β = 1.96,p <;0.001;持续时间,T1:β = 1.36,p <;0.001)、PF(T1:β = 5.54,p <;0.001;T2:β = 8.63,p <;0.001)、体验回避(T1:β = -7.70,p <;0.001;T2:β = -10.07,p <;0.001)和认知融合(T2:β = -3.31,p = 0.007)。干预后一周体验性回避的变化在三个月的随访中对 ACT 在减少癌症特异性困扰(β = -7.40,p < 0.001;β = -3.68,95%CI,-5.77 至 -1.58)和促进 HRQoL(β = 11.15,p < 0.001;β = 5.49,95%CI,3.09 至 8.31)方面的效果起到了中介作用。在三个月的随访中,干预后一周的 PF 变化介导了 ACT 对 HRQoL 的影响(β = 11.15,p <0.001;β = 2.25,95%CI,0.66 至 4.19)。该干预措施可纳入癌症系统中的姑息治疗,为晚期癌症患者的福祉做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信