Untangling the complexity of innovativeness in new ventures: The interplay between causal entrepreneurial processes and social capital

IF 6.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS
Parisa Haim Faridian, Donald Neubaum, Siri Terjesen
{"title":"Untangling the complexity of innovativeness in new ventures: The interplay between causal entrepreneurial processes and social capital","authors":"Parisa Haim Faridian, Donald Neubaum, Siri Terjesen","doi":"10.1007/s11187-024-00903-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>This study investigates how adopting causation process during early stages of venture development can impact long-term innovation outcomes directly and indirectly through its interactions with three forms social capital. To do so, we use a sample of 1,214 new ventures in the U.S. and offer several contributions to theory and practice. First, by drawing on theories of entrepreneurial approaches, social networks, and innovation, it advances the theoretical understanding of the intersection of these areas. Second, the study uses a longitudinal approach to offer empirical evidence supporting the enduring effect of decision-making logics during early stages of new venture development on long-term innovation performance. Third, the findings of this study suggest that the dimensionality of causation is complex as presented in the heterogenous effects of the dimensions of causation on innovativeness, ranging from positive, to negative, to nonsignificant effects. Lastly, it offers insights on the complex indirect effects of causal approaches on innovativeness in new ventures, as they can both diminish and enhance the benefits of the three forms of social capital.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Plain English Summary</h3><p>How founders’ adoption of entrepreneurial approaches during early stages of venture development can impact long-term innovation outcomes directly and indirectly through its interaction with social capital. Innovation is critical for the success of new ventures, and entrepreneurs rely on decision-making strategies to create new and innovative products or services. The causal decision-making process, which represents predetermined, planned, and well-defined decision-making, promotes innovativeness in various settings (Sarasvathy, Sarasvathy, Academy of Management Review 26:243–263, 2001; Sarasvathy et al., Organization Studies 29:331–350, 2008, 2010; Dew, Sarasvathy, and Venkataraman, 2004; Alvarez &amp; Barney, 2007). However, an interesting paradox emerges as organic, dynamic, and flexible mechanisms, such as social interactions, can also foster innovativeness (Carnabuci and Diószegi, Academy of Management Journal 58:881–905, 2015). Understanding how causal processes interact with other constructs, such as social capital, to either promote or impede innovative outcomes can guide entrepreneurs as they pursue opportunities. Additionally, it is important to understand the long-term implications of the entrepreneurial processes that founders adopt during the early stages of venture development. Taken together, this study investigates how adopting causal processes during the early stages of venture development can have enduring effects on long-term innovation outcome directly and indirectly through its interaction with social capital. To test these theoretical arguments, this study uses data from the second Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED II), which surveyed 1,214 U.S. entrepreneurs between 2006 and 2011 about their ventures. This study offers several contributions. First, by drawing on theories of entrepreneurial processes, social processes, and innovation, we advance our understanding of the intersection of these areas. Second, the longitudinal approach offers empirical evidence supporting the enduring effect of decision-making logics during early stages of new venture development on long-term innovation outcomes. Third, our findings suggest that the dimensionality of causation is complex as presented in the heterogenous effects of the dimensions of causation on innovativeness ranging from positive, to negative, to nonsignificant. Lastly, we offer insights on the complex indirect effect of causal approaches on innovativeness in new ventures.</p>","PeriodicalId":21803,"journal":{"name":"Small Business Economics","volume":"315 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Business Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00903-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how adopting causation process during early stages of venture development can impact long-term innovation outcomes directly and indirectly through its interactions with three forms social capital. To do so, we use a sample of 1,214 new ventures in the U.S. and offer several contributions to theory and practice. First, by drawing on theories of entrepreneurial approaches, social networks, and innovation, it advances the theoretical understanding of the intersection of these areas. Second, the study uses a longitudinal approach to offer empirical evidence supporting the enduring effect of decision-making logics during early stages of new venture development on long-term innovation performance. Third, the findings of this study suggest that the dimensionality of causation is complex as presented in the heterogenous effects of the dimensions of causation on innovativeness, ranging from positive, to negative, to nonsignificant effects. Lastly, it offers insights on the complex indirect effects of causal approaches on innovativeness in new ventures, as they can both diminish and enhance the benefits of the three forms of social capital.

Plain English Summary

How founders’ adoption of entrepreneurial approaches during early stages of venture development can impact long-term innovation outcomes directly and indirectly through its interaction with social capital. Innovation is critical for the success of new ventures, and entrepreneurs rely on decision-making strategies to create new and innovative products or services. The causal decision-making process, which represents predetermined, planned, and well-defined decision-making, promotes innovativeness in various settings (Sarasvathy, Sarasvathy, Academy of Management Review 26:243–263, 2001; Sarasvathy et al., Organization Studies 29:331–350, 2008, 2010; Dew, Sarasvathy, and Venkataraman, 2004; Alvarez & Barney, 2007). However, an interesting paradox emerges as organic, dynamic, and flexible mechanisms, such as social interactions, can also foster innovativeness (Carnabuci and Diószegi, Academy of Management Journal 58:881–905, 2015). Understanding how causal processes interact with other constructs, such as social capital, to either promote or impede innovative outcomes can guide entrepreneurs as they pursue opportunities. Additionally, it is important to understand the long-term implications of the entrepreneurial processes that founders adopt during the early stages of venture development. Taken together, this study investigates how adopting causal processes during the early stages of venture development can have enduring effects on long-term innovation outcome directly and indirectly through its interaction with social capital. To test these theoretical arguments, this study uses data from the second Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED II), which surveyed 1,214 U.S. entrepreneurs between 2006 and 2011 about their ventures. This study offers several contributions. First, by drawing on theories of entrepreneurial processes, social processes, and innovation, we advance our understanding of the intersection of these areas. Second, the longitudinal approach offers empirical evidence supporting the enduring effect of decision-making logics during early stages of new venture development on long-term innovation outcomes. Third, our findings suggest that the dimensionality of causation is complex as presented in the heterogenous effects of the dimensions of causation on innovativeness ranging from positive, to negative, to nonsignificant. Lastly, we offer insights on the complex indirect effect of causal approaches on innovativeness in new ventures.

Abstract Image

解开新企业创新能力的复杂性:因果创业过程与社会资本之间的相互作用
摘要 本研究探讨了在风险企业发展的早期阶段采用因果流程如何通过其与三种形式的社会资本之间的相互作用直接或间接地影响长期创新成果。为此,我们使用了美国 1,214 家新企业的样本,为理论和实践做出了一些贡献。首先,通过借鉴创业方法、社会网络和创新理论,本研究推进了对这些领域交叉点的理论理解。其次,本研究采用纵向方法,提供了支持新企业发展早期阶段的决策逻辑对长期创新绩效产生持久影响的经验证据。第三,研究结果表明,因果关系的维度是复杂的,这体现在因果关系维度对创新性的不同影响上,既有正向影响,也有负向影响,还有非显著影响。最后,本研究还就因果关系对新企业创新能力的复杂间接影响提出了见解,因为这些影响既能削弱也能增强三种形式的社会资本所带来的益处。创新对新企业的成功至关重要,而创业者则依靠决策策略来创造新的创新产品或服务。因果决策过程代表了预定的、有计划的和定义明确的决策,在各种环境下都能促进创新(Sarasvathy、Sarasvathy,《管理学院评论》26:243-263,2001 年;Sarasvathy 等人,《组织研究》29:331-350,2008 年,2010 年;Dew、Sarasvathy 和 Venkataraman,2004 年;Alvarez & Barney,2007 年)。然而,一个有趣的悖论出现了,因为有机、动态和灵活的机制,如社会互动,也能促进创新(Carnabuci 和 Diószegi,《管理学院学报》58:881-905,2015 年)。了解因果过程如何与社会资本等其他构建因素相互作用,从而促进或阻碍创新成果的产生,可以为创业者寻找机会提供指导。此外,了解创始人在创业发展早期阶段所采用的创业过程的长期影响也很重要。综上所述,本研究探讨了在风险企业发展的早期阶段采用因果流程如何通过与社会资本的互动直接或间接地对长期创新成果产生持久影响。为了验证这些理论论点,本研究使用了第二次创业动态面板研究(Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics, PSED II)的数据。本研究有以下几个方面的贡献。首先,通过借鉴创业过程、社会过程和创新理论,我们加深了对这些领域交叉点的理解。其次,纵向研究方法提供了经验证据,支持新企业发展早期阶段的决策逻辑对长期创新成果的持久影响。第三,我们的研究结果表明,因果关系的维度是复杂的,这体现在因果关系的维度对创新性的不同影响上,从积极到消极,再到不显著。最后,我们就因果关系对新企业创新能力的复杂间接影响提出了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Small Business Economics: An Entrepreneurship Journal (SBEJ) publishes original, rigorous theoretical and empirical research addressing all aspects of entrepreneurship and small business economics, with a special emphasis on the economic and societal relevance of research findings for scholars, practitioners and policy makers. SBEJ covers a broad scope of topics, ranging from the core themes of the entrepreneurial process and new venture creation to other topics like self-employment, family firms, small and medium-sized enterprises, innovative start-ups, and entrepreneurial finance. SBEJ welcomes scientific studies at different levels of analysis, including individuals (e.g. entrepreneurs'' characteristics and occupational choice), firms (e.g., firms’ life courses and performance, innovation, and global issues like digitization), macro level (e.g., institutions and public policies within local, regional, national and international contexts), as well as cross-level dynamics. As a leading entrepreneurship journal, SBEJ welcomes cross-disciplinary research. Officially cited as: Small Bus Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信