Can increasing preventive patrol in large geographic areas reduce crime? A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
David Weisburd, Kevin Petersen, Cody W. Telep, Sydney A. Fay
{"title":"Can increasing preventive patrol in large geographic areas reduce crime? A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"David Weisburd,&nbsp;Kevin Petersen,&nbsp;Cody W. Telep,&nbsp;Sydney A. Fay","doi":"10.1111/1745-9133.12665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research summary</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining whether increasing preventive patrol in large areas reduces crime. Our review included experimental and quasi-experimental studies that focused on areas such as beats, precincts, or entire jurisdictions and that measured a crime outcome either through official data or surveys. We identified 17 studies to include in our review. We used two methods for assessing study impacts: an approach which identified a primary/general outcome measure and a second approach which used robust variance estimation (RVE) and included all effect sizes across each study. Both approaches showed small crime prevention benefits (RVE: 9% decline; primary/general: 6% decline), but only the RVE model was significant at conventional levels (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). There was no significant evidence of displacement. Moderator analyses suggest that as dosage increases so do the crime prevention impacts. In RVE models, preventive patrol was associated with significant reductions in property and violent crime, but nonsignificant increases in drug and disorder offenses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\n \n <p>Increasing preventive patrol activities has the potential to reduce crime in large administrative areas. At the same time, existing studies offer little guidance as to how such preventive patrol should be carried out. Deterrence theory, as well as evidence from studies of hot spots policing, suggests that the greatest benefits will be gained from informing patrol efforts about where and when crime occurs. Although more research is needed regarding patrol allocations in large areas, present knowledge suggests that the more such patrols can be targeted at specific places at specific times, the greater will be the crime control benefits. In this context, we argue that police agencies may want to apply a hybrid approach to police patrol, which would include a combination of hot spots policing units and general patrol units informed by data on where crime is concentrated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47902,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1745-9133.12665","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12665","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research summary

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining whether increasing preventive patrol in large areas reduces crime. Our review included experimental and quasi-experimental studies that focused on areas such as beats, precincts, or entire jurisdictions and that measured a crime outcome either through official data or surveys. We identified 17 studies to include in our review. We used two methods for assessing study impacts: an approach which identified a primary/general outcome measure and a second approach which used robust variance estimation (RVE) and included all effect sizes across each study. Both approaches showed small crime prevention benefits (RVE: 9% decline; primary/general: 6% decline), but only the RVE model was significant at conventional levels (p < 0.05). There was no significant evidence of displacement. Moderator analyses suggest that as dosage increases so do the crime prevention impacts. In RVE models, preventive patrol was associated with significant reductions in property and violent crime, but nonsignificant increases in drug and disorder offenses.

Policy implications

Increasing preventive patrol activities has the potential to reduce crime in large administrative areas. At the same time, existing studies offer little guidance as to how such preventive patrol should be carried out. Deterrence theory, as well as evidence from studies of hot spots policing, suggests that the greatest benefits will be gained from informing patrol efforts about where and when crime occurs. Although more research is needed regarding patrol allocations in large areas, present knowledge suggests that the more such patrols can be targeted at specific places at specific times, the greater will be the crime control benefits. In this context, we argue that police agencies may want to apply a hybrid approach to police patrol, which would include a combination of hot spots policing units and general patrol units informed by data on where crime is concentrated.

Abstract Image

在大片地区增加预防性巡逻能否减少犯罪?系统回顾和荟萃分析
研究摘要我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,研究在大面积区域增加预防性巡逻是否会减少犯罪。我们的综述包括实验性和准实验性研究,这些研究关注的区域包括节拍、辖区或整个辖区,并通过官方数据或调查来衡量犯罪结果。我们确定了 17 项研究纳入审查范围。我们使用了两种方法来评估研究的影响:一种是确定主要/一般结果衡量标准的方法,另一种是使用稳健方差估计(RVE)并包含每项研究的所有效应大小的方法。两种方法都显示了较小的犯罪预防效益(RVE:下降 9%;主要/一般:下降 6%),但只有 RVE 模型在常规水平上具有显著性(p < 0.05)。没有明显的替代证据。调节分析表明,随着剂量的增加,预防犯罪的影响也在增加。在 RVE 模型中,预防性巡逻与财产犯罪和暴力犯罪的显著减少有关,但与毒品犯罪和扰乱治安犯罪的显著增加无关。与此同时,现有研究对如何开展这种预防性巡逻几乎没有提供指导。威慑理论以及热点地区警务研究的证据表明,将犯罪发生的时间和地点作为巡逻工作的依据将获得最大收益。虽然还需要对大面积区域的巡逻分配进行更多研究,但目前的知识表明,越是能够在特定时间针对特定地点进行巡逻,犯罪控制的效益就越大。在这种情况下,我们认为,警察机构可能希望采用一种混合的警察巡逻方法,其中包括结合热点地区的治安单位和一般巡逻单位,并根据犯罪集中地点的数据提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Criminology & Public Policy
Criminology & Public Policy CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
6.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Criminology & Public Policy is interdisciplinary in nature, devoted to policy discussions of criminology research findings. Focusing on the study of criminal justice policy and practice, the central objective of the journal is to strengthen the role of research findings in the formulation of crime and justice policy by publishing empirically based, policy focused articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信