The Time House: between cybernetics and phenomenology

Ersi Ioannidou
{"title":"The Time House: between cybernetics and phenomenology","authors":"Ersi Ioannidou","doi":"10.14324/111.444.amps.2024v27i1.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nMartin Pawley’s ‘The Time House’ (1968) is a study on how to use multimedia technologies to provide a continuous record of individual experience within the domestic interior. The project’s underlying argument is that there is no authentic experience to be had in the public realm. As an antidote, Pawley proposes a retreat into a private world, where individuals, with the use of technology, can retain a continuous and repayable record of time. Thus, The Time House would enable its inhabitants to relive – phenomenologically, with all the senses – past experiences. Pawley believed that this repeated, unembellished re-creation of the past would reveal to its inhabitants a truer version of both the past and themselves, thus offering opportunities for introspection and self-knowledge. The Time House tries to bring together all the key concerns of architecture in the late 1960s: cybernetics, phenomenology, environmental behaviour studies, the use of cutting-edge technology, Cold War politics and fears, and the countercultural aim to expand human consciousness. Yet, Pawley’s proposition to use technology to simulate lived experiences with the aim of altering human behaviour still stimulates heated arguments today. These arguments stem from current fears about the effects of digital technologies on individuals and society: the disconnection with the here-and-now, the prioritisation of the individual over the collective, the disintegration of reality and the neglect of social public space. The Time House, which could be dismissed as a project of its time and place, is embedded in a web of ideas still resonant in our present. \n","PeriodicalId":518028,"journal":{"name":"Architecture_MPS","volume":"428 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture_MPS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.amps.2024v27i1.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Martin Pawley’s ‘The Time House’ (1968) is a study on how to use multimedia technologies to provide a continuous record of individual experience within the domestic interior. The project’s underlying argument is that there is no authentic experience to be had in the public realm. As an antidote, Pawley proposes a retreat into a private world, where individuals, with the use of technology, can retain a continuous and repayable record of time. Thus, The Time House would enable its inhabitants to relive – phenomenologically, with all the senses – past experiences. Pawley believed that this repeated, unembellished re-creation of the past would reveal to its inhabitants a truer version of both the past and themselves, thus offering opportunities for introspection and self-knowledge. The Time House tries to bring together all the key concerns of architecture in the late 1960s: cybernetics, phenomenology, environmental behaviour studies, the use of cutting-edge technology, Cold War politics and fears, and the countercultural aim to expand human consciousness. Yet, Pawley’s proposition to use technology to simulate lived experiences with the aim of altering human behaviour still stimulates heated arguments today. These arguments stem from current fears about the effects of digital technologies on individuals and society: the disconnection with the here-and-now, the prioritisation of the individual over the collective, the disintegration of reality and the neglect of social public space. The Time House, which could be dismissed as a project of its time and place, is embedded in a web of ideas still resonant in our present.
时间屋:控制论与现象学之间
马丁-波利(Martin Pawley)的 "时间屋"(1968 年)是一项关于如何利用多媒体技术在家庭内部持续记录个人经历的研究。该项目的基本论点是,在公共领域没有真实的体验可言。作为一种解毒剂,Pawley 建议人们退隐到一个私人世界,在那里,个人可以利用技术保留一份连续的、可偿还的时间记录。因此,"时间屋 "可以让居住者从现象学的角度,用所有感官重温过去的经历。帕利相信,这种对过去不加修饰的重复再现,将为居住者揭示一个更真实的过去和他们自己,从而提供反省和认识自我的机会。时间屋》试图将 20 世纪 60 年代末建筑学的所有主要关注点汇集在一起:控制论、现象学、环境行为研究、尖端技术的使用、冷战政治和恐惧,以及拓展人类意识的反文化目标。然而,帕利提出的利用技术模拟生活经验以改变人类行为的主张,至今仍引发激烈争论。这些争论源于当下人们对数字技术对个人和社会影响的担忧:与此时此地的脱节、个人优先于集体、现实的瓦解和对社会公共空间的忽视。时间屋 "可以被认为是一个与时代和地点不符的项目,但它所蕴含的思想网络仍在我们的当下引起共鸣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信