An Innovative Approach to Real-Time NMR Permeability Calibration Utilizing Azimuthally Oriented Formation Testing While Drilling

M. Fouda, A. Taher, O. Ramadan, A. Binghaith, M. Saad
{"title":"An Innovative Approach to Real-Time NMR Permeability Calibration Utilizing Azimuthally Oriented Formation Testing While Drilling","authors":"M. Fouda, A. Taher, O. Ramadan, A. Binghaith, M. Saad","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23833-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Evaluating lateral variations of permeability is usually attempted using conventional logging tools and relying on field-specific porosity-permeability relationships. These transforms are generally built on core analysis and previous reservoir knowledge. Many Carbonate reservoirs given their complex pore structure, however, exhibit poor relationship between porosity & permeability and would hence need other more sophisticated methodologies and workflows to evaluate permeability. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a well-known measurement that can provide indications of pore size in heterogeneous reservoirs and can hence be used for permeability evaluation. Formation testing while drilling (FTWD) can be used for mobility estimation while drilling. This paper presents the benefits of integrating logging-while-drilling (LWD) azimuthally oriented FTWD and NMR to reliably evaluate lateral permeability variations in horizontal wells.\n NMR log-derived permeability is achieved by analyzing the T1 or T2 distributions and applying a cutoff differentiating pore size variation. The classification of the pore size distribution is input into established NMR permeability equations. These equations, however, have coefficients that need to be determined. The optimum irreducible water saturation cutoff as well as the permeability equation coefficients are ideally established with core analysis techniques. In horizontal wells across heterogeneous reservoirs having no representative core plugs formation testing can be used to help establish these parameters. Formation tester tools have been traditionally utilized to acquire a single pressure measurement and mobility calculation at any specified depth station. LWD testers, however, can be oriented around the wellbore to acquire several pressure and mobility values at different orientations. After investigating real time azimuthal images for bed boundaries and azimuthal variations, specific orientations of the formation tester can be selected to provide the most representative.\n LWD NMR real-time permeability indicators showed pore size variations at the same porosity range. FTWD mobility data has enabled normalization of NMR permeability curves by providing calibration points at the test stations. The azimuthal orientation of FTWD tests was selected using LWD real time density and resistivity images to ensure the FTWD probe is not pointing to a tight bed boundary. High-resolution resistivity images from memory data provided an understanding to the mechanism causing variation in the azimuthal permeability profile. Combination of oriented FTWD and NMR permeability indicators aided real-time well-placement decisions and helped placing the wells into the most permeable zones. This paper presents an innovative approach for evaluating real-time permeability utilizing oriented LWD formation-testing mobility data with NMR permeability indicators.","PeriodicalId":519056,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, February 12, 2024","volume":"513 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, February 12, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23833-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating lateral variations of permeability is usually attempted using conventional logging tools and relying on field-specific porosity-permeability relationships. These transforms are generally built on core analysis and previous reservoir knowledge. Many Carbonate reservoirs given their complex pore structure, however, exhibit poor relationship between porosity & permeability and would hence need other more sophisticated methodologies and workflows to evaluate permeability. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is a well-known measurement that can provide indications of pore size in heterogeneous reservoirs and can hence be used for permeability evaluation. Formation testing while drilling (FTWD) can be used for mobility estimation while drilling. This paper presents the benefits of integrating logging-while-drilling (LWD) azimuthally oriented FTWD and NMR to reliably evaluate lateral permeability variations in horizontal wells. NMR log-derived permeability is achieved by analyzing the T1 or T2 distributions and applying a cutoff differentiating pore size variation. The classification of the pore size distribution is input into established NMR permeability equations. These equations, however, have coefficients that need to be determined. The optimum irreducible water saturation cutoff as well as the permeability equation coefficients are ideally established with core analysis techniques. In horizontal wells across heterogeneous reservoirs having no representative core plugs formation testing can be used to help establish these parameters. Formation tester tools have been traditionally utilized to acquire a single pressure measurement and mobility calculation at any specified depth station. LWD testers, however, can be oriented around the wellbore to acquire several pressure and mobility values at different orientations. After investigating real time azimuthal images for bed boundaries and azimuthal variations, specific orientations of the formation tester can be selected to provide the most representative. LWD NMR real-time permeability indicators showed pore size variations at the same porosity range. FTWD mobility data has enabled normalization of NMR permeability curves by providing calibration points at the test stations. The azimuthal orientation of FTWD tests was selected using LWD real time density and resistivity images to ensure the FTWD probe is not pointing to a tight bed boundary. High-resolution resistivity images from memory data provided an understanding to the mechanism causing variation in the azimuthal permeability profile. Combination of oriented FTWD and NMR permeability indicators aided real-time well-placement decisions and helped placing the wells into the most permeable zones. This paper presents an innovative approach for evaluating real-time permeability utilizing oriented LWD formation-testing mobility data with NMR permeability indicators.
利用钻井过程中的方位地层测试进行实时 NMR 渗透率校准的创新方法
评估渗透率的横向变化通常使用常规测井工具,并依赖于特定油田的孔隙度-渗透率关系。这些转换通常建立在岩心分析和以往的储层知识基础上。然而,许多碳酸盐岩储层的孔隙结构复杂,孔隙度与渗透率之间的关系较差,因此需要其他更复杂的方法和工作流程来评估渗透率。核磁共振(NMR)是一种众所周知的测量方法,可以显示异质储层中的孔隙大小,因此可用于渗透率评估。钻井过程中的地层测试(FTWD)可用于钻井过程中的流动性评估。本文介绍了边钻井边测井(LWD)方位定向 FTWD 和 NMR 集成的好处,以可靠地评估水平井的横向渗透率变化。通过分析 T1 或 T2 分布并应用区分孔隙大小变化的截止值,可以获得 NMR 测井推导出的渗透率。孔径分布的分类被输入既定的 NMR 渗透率方程。不过,这些方程的系数需要确定。最佳的不可还原水饱和度截止值以及渗透率方程系数最好通过岩心分析技术来确定。在穿越没有代表性岩心堵塞的异质储层的水平井中,地层测试可用于帮助确定这些参数。地层测试工具传统上用于在任何指定深度站获得单一压力测量值和流动性计算值。然而,LWD测试仪可以围绕井筒定向,在不同方位获取多个压力和流动性值。在对床层边界和方位角变化的实时方位角图像进行调查后,可以选择地层测试仪的特定方向,以提供最具代表性的数据。LWD NMR 实时渗透率指标显示了相同孔隙度范围内的孔隙大小变化。FTWD 渗透率数据通过在测试站提供校准点,使 NMR 渗透率曲线正常化。利用 LWD 实时密度和电阻率图像选择了 FTWD 测试的方位角方向,以确保 FTWD 探头不会指向紧密的床层边界。记忆数据中的高分辨率电阻率图像有助于了解造成方位渗透率剖面变化的机理。将定向 FTWD 和 NMR 渗透率指标结合起来,有助于做出实时的井位决策,将油井打入渗透率最高的区域。本文介绍了一种利用定向 LWD 地层测试流动性数据和 NMR 渗透率指标评估实时渗透率的创新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信