A Developed Robust Model and Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Drilling Fluid Density and Equivalent Circulation Density in Real-Time

Mohammed Murif Al-Rubaii محمد مريف الربعي
{"title":"A Developed Robust Model and Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Drilling Fluid Density and Equivalent Circulation Density in Real-Time","authors":"Mohammed Murif Al-Rubaii محمد مريف الربعي","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23904-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n When drilling deep wells, it is important to regulate the formation pressure and prevent kicks. This is achieved by controlling the equivalent circulation density (ECD), which becomes crucial in high-pressure and high-temperature wells. ECD is particularly important in formations where the pore pressure and fracture pressure are close from each other (narrow windows). However, the current methods for measuring ECD using downhole sensors can be expensive and limited by operational constraints such as high pressure and temperature. Therefore, to overcome this challenge, two novel models name as ECDeffc.m and MWeffc.m with approach was developed to predict ECD and mud weight (MW) from surface drilling parameters, including standpipe pressure, rate of penetration, drill string rotation, and mud properties. In addition, by utilizing an artificial neural network (ANN) and a support vector machine (SVM), ECD was estimated with a correlation co-efficient of 0.9947 and an average absolute percentage error of 0.23%. Meanwhile, a decision tree (DT) was employed to estimate MW with a correlation coefficient of 0.9353 and an average absolute percentage error of 0.001%. The two novel models were compared with the artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to evaluate the developed models. The results proved that the two novel models were more accurate with the value that obtained from pressure while drilling tools (PWD). These models can be utilized during well design and while drilling operation to evaluate and monitor the appropriate mud weight and equivalent circulation density for saving time and money by eliminating the need for expensive downhole equipment and commercial software.","PeriodicalId":519056,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, February 12, 2024","volume":"66 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, February 12, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23904-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When drilling deep wells, it is important to regulate the formation pressure and prevent kicks. This is achieved by controlling the equivalent circulation density (ECD), which becomes crucial in high-pressure and high-temperature wells. ECD is particularly important in formations where the pore pressure and fracture pressure are close from each other (narrow windows). However, the current methods for measuring ECD using downhole sensors can be expensive and limited by operational constraints such as high pressure and temperature. Therefore, to overcome this challenge, two novel models name as ECDeffc.m and MWeffc.m with approach was developed to predict ECD and mud weight (MW) from surface drilling parameters, including standpipe pressure, rate of penetration, drill string rotation, and mud properties. In addition, by utilizing an artificial neural network (ANN) and a support vector machine (SVM), ECD was estimated with a correlation co-efficient of 0.9947 and an average absolute percentage error of 0.23%. Meanwhile, a decision tree (DT) was employed to estimate MW with a correlation coefficient of 0.9353 and an average absolute percentage error of 0.001%. The two novel models were compared with the artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to evaluate the developed models. The results proved that the two novel models were more accurate with the value that obtained from pressure while drilling tools (PWD). These models can be utilized during well design and while drilling operation to evaluate and monitor the appropriate mud weight and equivalent circulation density for saving time and money by eliminating the need for expensive downhole equipment and commercial software.
利用开发的稳健模型和人工智能技术实时预测钻井液密度和等效循环密度
在钻深井时,调节地层压力和防止井喷非常重要。这可以通过控制当量循环密度(ECD)来实现,而当量循环密度在高压高温井中至关重要。ECD 在孔隙压力和裂缝压力相互接近(窄窗口)的地层中尤为重要。然而,目前使用井下传感器测量 ECD 的方法可能比较昂贵,而且受到高压和高温等操作限制。因此,为了克服这一难题,我们开发了两种新型模型,分别称为 ECDeffc.m 和 MWeffc.m,并通过地面钻井参数(包括立管压力、穿透率、钻杆旋转和泥浆特性)预测 ECD 和泥浆重量(MW)。此外,通过使用人工神经网络(ANN)和支持向量机(SVM),ECD 的相关系数为 0.9947,平均绝对百分比误差为 0.23%。同时,采用决策树(DT)估算 MW 的相关系数为 0.9353,平均绝对百分比误差为 0.001%。将这两种新型模型与人工智能(AI)技术进行了比较,以评估所开发的模型。结果证明,这两种新型模型与钻井工具(PWD)获得的压力值相比更加精确。这些模型可在油井设计和钻井作业时用于评估和监测适当的泥浆重量和等效循环密度,从而节省时间和金钱,无需使用昂贵的井下设备和商业软件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书