Conveyance Options for Pipe Recovery in a Stuck Drill Pipe Scenario in Horizontal Wells

S. Kishore, J. Woods, D. Engel, K. Batyrkhanov
{"title":"Conveyance Options for Pipe Recovery in a Stuck Drill Pipe Scenario in Horizontal Wells","authors":"S. Kishore, J. Woods, D. Engel, K. Batyrkhanov","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23932-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recovery of stuck drill pipe is a challenge in deep horizontal wells. Typically, in a vertical or slightly deviated well, after attempts have been made for recovery of stuck drill pipe by working the pipe, the option to convey the pipe recovery tools with electric line is relatively simple due to gravity descent. However, in horizontal wells, the options to convey the recovery tools require electric line using tractor or pump-down techniques; alternatively, coiled tubing can be used for conveyance. Our study evaluates these three methods and compares the efficiency and effectiveness of these conveyance methodologies.\n The application of these solutions each have their own advantages and some disadvantages, especially as the access within the drill pipe can be limited due to the presence of various types of restrictions such as debris or the variable diameter inside the pipe, which usually has an \"internal upset\" on the connections. These restrictions combined with the potential nonexistence of circulation will affect the maximum reach for the conveyance methods to differing degrees. The ability to reach the target may be limited in extended reach wells and the target cutting depth may not be feasible with some conveyance options. The presence of radioactive sources in the drilling assembly may also complicate the pipe recovery operation.\n Three different conveyance options to perform the pipe recovery operation used on different operations in the Middle East are documented: e-line tractor, e-line pump-down, and coiled tubing conveyance. We compare the options and evaluate the results from the three conveyance methods for the pipe recovery tools to sever the stuck drill pipe. Each of the methodologies can be effective, and the ideal application depends on the existing downhole conditions present at the point the drill pipe becomes stuck.","PeriodicalId":519056,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, February 12, 2024","volume":"72 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, February 12, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23932-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recovery of stuck drill pipe is a challenge in deep horizontal wells. Typically, in a vertical or slightly deviated well, after attempts have been made for recovery of stuck drill pipe by working the pipe, the option to convey the pipe recovery tools with electric line is relatively simple due to gravity descent. However, in horizontal wells, the options to convey the recovery tools require electric line using tractor or pump-down techniques; alternatively, coiled tubing can be used for conveyance. Our study evaluates these three methods and compares the efficiency and effectiveness of these conveyance methodologies. The application of these solutions each have their own advantages and some disadvantages, especially as the access within the drill pipe can be limited due to the presence of various types of restrictions such as debris or the variable diameter inside the pipe, which usually has an "internal upset" on the connections. These restrictions combined with the potential nonexistence of circulation will affect the maximum reach for the conveyance methods to differing degrees. The ability to reach the target may be limited in extended reach wells and the target cutting depth may not be feasible with some conveyance options. The presence of radioactive sources in the drilling assembly may also complicate the pipe recovery operation. Three different conveyance options to perform the pipe recovery operation used on different operations in the Middle East are documented: e-line tractor, e-line pump-down, and coiled tubing conveyance. We compare the options and evaluate the results from the three conveyance methods for the pipe recovery tools to sever the stuck drill pipe. Each of the methodologies can be effective, and the ideal application depends on the existing downhole conditions present at the point the drill pipe becomes stuck.
水平井卡钻情况下的管道回收输送方案
在深水平井中,回收被卡钻杆是一项挑战。通常情况下,在垂直井或轻微偏斜井中,在尝试通过钻杆作业回收卡住的钻杆后,由于重力下降,使用电线输送回收工具的方案相对简单。然而,在水平井中,使用拖拉机或泵下技术输送回收工具需要使用电线;另外,也可以使用盘管进行输送。我们的研究对这三种方法进行了评估,并比较了这些输送方法的效率和效果。这些解决方案的应用各有利弊,特别是由于钻杆内存在各种类型的限制,例如碎屑或钻杆内直径不一,通常会对连接产生 "内部扰动",因此钻杆内的进入可能会受到限制。这些限制加上可能不存在的循环,将在不同程度上影响输送方法的最大到达能力。一些输送方法可能无法达到目标切割深度。钻井组件中的放射源也可能使油管回收作业复杂化。本文记录了在中东不同作业中使用的三种不同的输送方案来执行油管回收作业:电子线路牵引、电子线路下泵和盘管输送。我们对这三种方案进行了比较,并评估了用于钻杆回收工具切断卡住钻杆的三种输送方法的效果。每种方法都很有效,理想的应用取决于钻杆卡住时的现有井下条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信