Legacy Wells Screening Method for Potential CO2 Storage Sites

H. C. Enriquez, H. Dick, C. Holloway, R. Salter
{"title":"Legacy Wells Screening Method for Potential CO2 Storage Sites","authors":"H. C. Enriquez, H. Dick, C. Holloway, R. Salter","doi":"10.2523/iptc-24131-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The authors developed a legacy-wells screening method for potential CO2 storage sites. The screening method enables project teams to evaluate qualitatively, in a consistent manner, the legacy wells risks at potential Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) candidate sites. It does so by identifying the legacy wells current status, preliminary corrective action requirements and associated risks based on a specific data set that can be extracted from public well records.\n For CO2 storage sites, legacy wells are existing wells that are located within the predicted CO2 plume and/or pressure front area. When assessing the feasibility of potential storage site candidates, legacy wells risk is an important variable for ranking the feasibility of potential locations against each other. Legacy wells risk is a result of not only the number of wells but also their leakage potential and the complexity of the corrective actions required. Often, only legacy well density (number of wells per squared kilometer) is evaluated, disregarding elements of risk such as well status, well age, well architecture, well mechanical status, etc.; if or when a risk level is assigned to the wells, it is done so in a subjective manner. A systematic method will be illustrated in this paper that evaluates existing well conditions and intervention requirements to evaluate legacy wells risk for potential storage sites.\n To evaluate the legacy wells risk beyond only well density and to eliminate the subjectivity of screening, the authors used a method based on a ranking system that considers a few, critical, well characteristics to assign a risk score that can then be compared equally between potential locations. The ranking system assigns risk scores to legacy wells based on the availability and quality of well data, and in parallel the complexity and risks of each potential remediation or corrective action.\n The paper will present a case study of a CCS site feasibility study where the workflow was applied to provide a consistent approach to legacy well assessment and qualitative risk evaluation for potential storage sites. Future CCS operators will benefit from this approach to improve decision making before selecting and moving forward with a storage site.","PeriodicalId":519056,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, February 12, 2024","volume":"27 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, February 12, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-24131-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors developed a legacy-wells screening method for potential CO2 storage sites. The screening method enables project teams to evaluate qualitatively, in a consistent manner, the legacy wells risks at potential Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) candidate sites. It does so by identifying the legacy wells current status, preliminary corrective action requirements and associated risks based on a specific data set that can be extracted from public well records. For CO2 storage sites, legacy wells are existing wells that are located within the predicted CO2 plume and/or pressure front area. When assessing the feasibility of potential storage site candidates, legacy wells risk is an important variable for ranking the feasibility of potential locations against each other. Legacy wells risk is a result of not only the number of wells but also their leakage potential and the complexity of the corrective actions required. Often, only legacy well density (number of wells per squared kilometer) is evaluated, disregarding elements of risk such as well status, well age, well architecture, well mechanical status, etc.; if or when a risk level is assigned to the wells, it is done so in a subjective manner. A systematic method will be illustrated in this paper that evaluates existing well conditions and intervention requirements to evaluate legacy wells risk for potential storage sites. To evaluate the legacy wells risk beyond only well density and to eliminate the subjectivity of screening, the authors used a method based on a ranking system that considers a few, critical, well characteristics to assign a risk score that can then be compared equally between potential locations. The ranking system assigns risk scores to legacy wells based on the availability and quality of well data, and in parallel the complexity and risks of each potential remediation or corrective action. The paper will present a case study of a CCS site feasibility study where the workflow was applied to provide a consistent approach to legacy well assessment and qualitative risk evaluation for potential storage sites. Future CCS operators will benefit from this approach to improve decision making before selecting and moving forward with a storage site.
潜在二氧化碳封存地点的遗留井筛选方法
作者为潜在的二氧化碳封存地点开发了一种遗留井筛选方法。该筛选方法使项目团队能够以一致的方式对潜在碳捕集与封存(CCS)候选地点的遗留井风险进行定性评估。具体方法是根据可从公共水井记录中提取的特定数据集,确定遗留水井的当前状态、初步纠正措施要求和相关风险。对于二氧化碳封存场址而言,遗留水井是指位于预测的二氧化碳羽流和/或压力前沿区域内的现有水井。在评估潜在候选封存地点的可行性时,遗留井风险是对潜在地点的可行性进行排序的一个重要变量。遗留油井风险不仅是油井数量的结果,也是其泄漏潜力和所需纠正措施复杂性的结果。通常情况下,只评估遗留水井的密度(每平方公里的水井数量),而不考虑水井状况、井龄、水井结构、水井机械状况等风险因素;如果或当给水井分配风险等级时,也是以主观方式进行的。本文将说明一种系统方法,通过评估现有油井状况和干预要求来评估潜在储藏地点的遗留油井风险。为了评估传统油井的风险,而不仅仅是油井密度,并消除筛选的主观性,作者使用了一种基于排序系统的方法,该系统考虑了一些关键的油井特征来分配风险分值,然后可以在潜在地点之间进行平等比较。该排序系统根据油井数据的可用性和质量,以及每种潜在补救或纠正措施的复杂性和风险,对遗留油井进行风险评分。论文将介绍一个CCS场地可行性研究案例,在该案例中,工作流程被用于为潜在的储存场地提供一致的遗留井评估和定性风险评估方法。未来的 CCS 运营商将受益于这种方法,在选择和推进贮存地点之前改善决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信