Study of Post-Spalling Reinforced Concrete Beam Repair Using Grouting and GFRP Reinforcement

Achmad Z. Mansur, R. Djamaluddin, H. Parung, R. Irmawaty
{"title":"Study of Post-Spalling Reinforced Concrete Beam Repair Using Grouting and GFRP Reinforcement","authors":"Achmad Z. Mansur, R. Djamaluddin, H. Parung, R. Irmawaty","doi":"10.28991/cej-2024-010-01-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reinforced concrete beams must meet strength and durability standards, but aggressive environmental factors are the main cause of corrosion, which can affect the strength and durability of building structures. Maintenance, retrofitting, and reinforcement of structures are important to ensure safety. It is necessary to take appropriate measures to address corrosion problems in building structures early on. One way to achieve this is by repairing damaged structures using more modern and effective technologies and materials. This study aims to determine the flexural behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams repaired with Sikagrout-215 material and reinforced with GFRP sheets with different layer configurations. The study used three RC beams as the control group, three RC beams coated with Sikagrout-215 mortar, and six RC beams reinforced with GFRP. All beams were subjected to 4-point bending tests to determine their load capacity, crack response, ductility, and energy absorption capacity. The results showed that repair with grouting decreased the load capacity, while reinforcement with a combination of mortar grouting and GFRP increased the maximum load. Reinforcement of the support region could restore the function of the beam by 9.3%. Among the three types of reinforcement, BGRST significantly improved the first crack response, yield response, and ultimate performance of the RC beams. Beam fracture occurred more frequently with Sikagrout-215 mortar reinforcement, while reinforcement with GFRP composites partially protected the load capacity after fracture. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-01-08 Full Text: PDF","PeriodicalId":10233,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2024-010-01-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reinforced concrete beams must meet strength and durability standards, but aggressive environmental factors are the main cause of corrosion, which can affect the strength and durability of building structures. Maintenance, retrofitting, and reinforcement of structures are important to ensure safety. It is necessary to take appropriate measures to address corrosion problems in building structures early on. One way to achieve this is by repairing damaged structures using more modern and effective technologies and materials. This study aims to determine the flexural behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams repaired with Sikagrout-215 material and reinforced with GFRP sheets with different layer configurations. The study used three RC beams as the control group, three RC beams coated with Sikagrout-215 mortar, and six RC beams reinforced with GFRP. All beams were subjected to 4-point bending tests to determine their load capacity, crack response, ductility, and energy absorption capacity. The results showed that repair with grouting decreased the load capacity, while reinforcement with a combination of mortar grouting and GFRP increased the maximum load. Reinforcement of the support region could restore the function of the beam by 9.3%. Among the three types of reinforcement, BGRST significantly improved the first crack response, yield response, and ultimate performance of the RC beams. Beam fracture occurred more frequently with Sikagrout-215 mortar reinforcement, while reinforcement with GFRP composites partially protected the load capacity after fracture. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-01-08 Full Text: PDF
利用灌浆和 GFRP 加固对剥落后钢筋混凝土梁进行修复的研究
钢筋混凝土梁必须符合强度和耐久性标准,但侵蚀性环境因素是腐蚀的主要原因,会影响建筑结构的强度和耐久性。结构的维护、改造和加固对于确保安全非常重要。有必要采取适当措施,尽早解决建筑结构的腐蚀问题。实现这一目标的方法之一是使用更现代、更有效的技术和材料修复受损结构。本研究旨在确定用 Sikagrout-215 材料修复并用不同层配置的 GFRP 片材加固的钢筋混凝土 (RC) 梁的抗弯行为。研究使用了三根钢筋混凝土梁作为对照组、三根涂有 Sikagrout-215 砂浆的钢筋混凝土梁和六根用 GFRP 加固的钢筋混凝土梁。对所有梁进行了 4 点弯曲试验,以确定其承载能力、裂缝反应、延展性和能量吸收能力。结果表明,灌浆修复降低了承载能力,而砂浆灌浆和 GFRP 组合加固提高了最大承载能力。对支撑区域进行加固可使梁的功能恢复 9.3%。在三种加固方法中,BGRST 能明显改善 RC 梁的首次裂缝响应、屈服响应和极限性能。使用 Sikagrout-215 砂浆加固时,梁的断裂发生率更高,而使用 GFRP 复合材料加固时,断裂后的承载能力得到了部分保护。Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-01-08 全文:PDF
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信