Greenness of dispersive microextraction using molecularly imprinted polymers

IF 3.6 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Tamara Tadić, Bojana Markovic, Sandra Bulatović, Jelena Lukić, Jelena Radulović, A. Nastasović, A. Onjia
{"title":"Greenness of dispersive microextraction using molecularly imprinted polymers","authors":"Tamara Tadić, Bojana Markovic, Sandra Bulatović, Jelena Lukić, Jelena Radulović, A. Nastasović, A. Onjia","doi":"10.1515/revac-2023-0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) as materials with determined levels of selectivity and specificity for designated analytes have recently gained much attention in various application fields. However, with the growing adoption of green analytical chemistry (GAC) principles, it is essential to investigate the greenness of MIP synthesis and its subsequent application in sample preparation, as well as to evaluate the “green” nature of the developed analytical methodologies, such as dispersive solid-phase microextraction (DSPME). Accordingly, the main objective of this research was to evaluate the greenness of MIP-based glycidyl methacrylate synthesis and MIP use as a DSPME sorbent prior to high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). The green perspective of MIP-DSPME prior to HPLC-MS was investigated using various analytical metric tools such as the Analytical Eco-Scale, the Green Analytical Procedure Index, and Analytical GREEnness (AGREE). Since these analytical tools are not fully implementable for the assessment of the greenness of the MIP synthesis, some alternative approaches were used to optimize the synthesis parameters to make the MIP DSPME sorbent as close as possible to the GAC principles. The calculated AGREE score (0.62) and 91 points in the Analytical Eco-Scale for the proposed DSPME technique using MIP indicated a high level of greenness.","PeriodicalId":21090,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/revac-2023-0070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) as materials with determined levels of selectivity and specificity for designated analytes have recently gained much attention in various application fields. However, with the growing adoption of green analytical chemistry (GAC) principles, it is essential to investigate the greenness of MIP synthesis and its subsequent application in sample preparation, as well as to evaluate the “green” nature of the developed analytical methodologies, such as dispersive solid-phase microextraction (DSPME). Accordingly, the main objective of this research was to evaluate the greenness of MIP-based glycidyl methacrylate synthesis and MIP use as a DSPME sorbent prior to high-performance liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). The green perspective of MIP-DSPME prior to HPLC-MS was investigated using various analytical metric tools such as the Analytical Eco-Scale, the Green Analytical Procedure Index, and Analytical GREEnness (AGREE). Since these analytical tools are not fully implementable for the assessment of the greenness of the MIP synthesis, some alternative approaches were used to optimize the synthesis parameters to make the MIP DSPME sorbent as close as possible to the GAC principles. The calculated AGREE score (0.62) and 91 points in the Analytical Eco-Scale for the proposed DSPME technique using MIP indicated a high level of greenness.
使用分子印迹聚合物进行分散微萃取的绿色环保性
分子印迹聚合物(MIPs)作为一种对指定分析物具有确定选择性和特异性的材料,近年来在各个应用领域受到广泛关注。然而,随着绿色分析化学(GAC)原则的日益广泛采用,研究 MIP 合成及其在样品制备中的后续应用的绿色性,以及评估已开发的分析方法(如分散固相微萃取(DSPME))的 "绿色 "性就显得尤为重要。因此,本研究的主要目的是评估基于 MIP 的甲基丙烯酸缩水甘油酯合成以及 MIP 用作高效液相色谱-质谱法(HPLC-MS)前的 DSPME 吸附剂的绿色环保性。使用各种分析度量工具(如分析生态尺度、绿色分析程序指数和分析 GREEnness (AGREE))对 HPLC-MS 前 MIP-DSPME 的绿色前景进行了研究。由于这些分析工具无法完全用于评估 MIP 合成的绿色程度,因此采用了一些替代方法来优化合成参数,以使 MIP DSPME 吸附剂尽可能接近 GAC 原理。计算得出的 AGREE 分数(0.62)和分析生态尺度中的 91 分表明,使用 MIP 的 DSPME 技术具有很高的绿色水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Analytical Chemistry
Reviews in Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Analytical Chemistry publishes authoritative reviews by leading experts in the dynamic field of chemical analysis. The subjects can encompass all branches of modern analytical chemistry such as spectroscopy, chromatography, mass spectrometry, electrochemistry and trace analysis and their applications to areas such as environmental control, pharmaceutical industry, automation and other relevant areas. Review articles bring the expert up to date in a concise manner and provide researchers an overview of new techniques and methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信