Towards a Coherent Trade-Environment Nexus? The EU’s Critical Raw Materials Policy

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sieglinde Gstöhl, Jonathan Schnock
{"title":"Towards a Coherent Trade-Environment Nexus? The EU’s Critical Raw Materials Policy","authors":"Sieglinde Gstöhl, Jonathan Schnock","doi":"10.54648/trad2024002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article contributes to the debate on the policy coherence of the trade-environment nexus by analysing the recent critical raw materials (CRM) policy of the European Union (EU). Critical raw materials are crucial for the green and digital transitions but face significant risks in their supply. This raises the question to what extent the EU can ensure a coherent approach in an era of geopolitics. The analysis proceeds in three steps: what does coherence mean (problem definition), how coherent are the EU’s policy objectives, and how coherent are its policy instruments designed for CRMs? The article finds that the EU’s problem definition of the trade-environment nexus has over the past two decades become more coherent. However, the rise of geopolitics has added foreign policy considerations to the understanding of this nexus. As the case of CRMs shows, open strategic autonomy, which aims to reduce strategic dependencies, generates incoherence among the policy objectives. The many existing or proposed EU policy instruments can, so far, be assessed as being relatively more coherent yet also with a mixed record. Future research will have to confirm this preliminary finding and also address the coherence of the policy implementation and outcomes of the EU’s CRMs policy.\ncritical raw materials, European Union, geopolitics, Green Deal, open strategic autonomy, policy coherence, sustainability, trade-environment nexus, trade policy, twin transition","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2024002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article contributes to the debate on the policy coherence of the trade-environment nexus by analysing the recent critical raw materials (CRM) policy of the European Union (EU). Critical raw materials are crucial for the green and digital transitions but face significant risks in their supply. This raises the question to what extent the EU can ensure a coherent approach in an era of geopolitics. The analysis proceeds in three steps: what does coherence mean (problem definition), how coherent are the EU’s policy objectives, and how coherent are its policy instruments designed for CRMs? The article finds that the EU’s problem definition of the trade-environment nexus has over the past two decades become more coherent. However, the rise of geopolitics has added foreign policy considerations to the understanding of this nexus. As the case of CRMs shows, open strategic autonomy, which aims to reduce strategic dependencies, generates incoherence among the policy objectives. The many existing or proposed EU policy instruments can, so far, be assessed as being relatively more coherent yet also with a mixed record. Future research will have to confirm this preliminary finding and also address the coherence of the policy implementation and outcomes of the EU’s CRMs policy. critical raw materials, European Union, geopolitics, Green Deal, open strategic autonomy, policy coherence, sustainability, trade-environment nexus, trade policy, twin transition
建立协调一致的贸易与环境关系?欧盟的关键原材料政策
本文通过分析欧盟(EU)近期的关键原材料(CRM)政策,为有关贸易与环境关系政策一致性的讨论做出了贡献。关键原材料对于绿色转型和数字化转型至关重要,但在供应方面却面临着巨大风险。这就提出了一个问题:在地缘政治时代,欧盟能在多大程度上确保采取协调一致的方法。分析分三步进行:一致性的含义(问题定义)、欧盟政策目标的一致性如何、欧盟为有证可循机制设计的政策工具的一致性如何?文章发现,在过去二十年中,欧盟对贸易与环境关系的问题定义变得更加一致。然而,地缘政治的兴起为对这一关系的理解增加了外交政策方面的考虑。正如公约与建议机制的案例所示,旨在减少战略依赖性的开放式战略自治会造成政策目标的不一致。迄今为止,许多现有或拟议的欧盟政策工具可以被评估为相对更加协调一致,但也有好坏参半的记录。未来的研究必须证实这一初步发现,并解决欧盟有证可循材料政策的政策实施和成果的一致性问题。关键原材料、欧盟、地缘政治、绿色交易、开放式战略自主、政策一致性、可持续性、贸易与环境的关系、贸易政策、双转型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信