A safety evaluation model of open-pit mine dust based on subjective and objective weighting method

IF 3.1 Q1 Mathematics
Jun Li
{"title":"A safety evaluation model of open-pit mine dust based on subjective and objective weighting method","authors":"Jun Li","doi":"10.2478/amns-2024-0329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n By analyzing the dust safety of open-pit mines, five primary indicators and 20 secondary indicators are determined for evaluation, and the subjective weights determined by the hierarchical analysis method and the objective weights determined by the entropy weighting method are combined to determine the subjective and objective weights; the scores of experts are integrated using fuzzy numbers to determine the final scores, and the combination of the two is used to construct the evaluation model of the dust safety of open-pit mines. Taking three mines as an example, the results show that the open pit mine dust safety of Mine is A\n 1 significantly better than that of the remaining two mines. The study shows that the model is suitable for open pit mine dust safety evaluation, considering the typical characteristics of subjectivity and objectivity, better reflecting the intention of the decision makers and the actual importance of the indicators, and making the results more scientific and objective. The proposed method provides a reference for determining dust safety in open pit mines.","PeriodicalId":52342,"journal":{"name":"Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By analyzing the dust safety of open-pit mines, five primary indicators and 20 secondary indicators are determined for evaluation, and the subjective weights determined by the hierarchical analysis method and the objective weights determined by the entropy weighting method are combined to determine the subjective and objective weights; the scores of experts are integrated using fuzzy numbers to determine the final scores, and the combination of the two is used to construct the evaluation model of the dust safety of open-pit mines. Taking three mines as an example, the results show that the open pit mine dust safety of Mine is A 1 significantly better than that of the remaining two mines. The study shows that the model is suitable for open pit mine dust safety evaluation, considering the typical characteristics of subjectivity and objectivity, better reflecting the intention of the decision makers and the actual importance of the indicators, and making the results more scientific and objective. The proposed method provides a reference for determining dust safety in open pit mines.
基于主客观加权法的露天矿粉尘安全评价模型
通过对露天矿山粉尘安全进行分析,确定了5个一级指标和20个二级指标进行评价,并将层次分析法确定的主观权重和熵权法确定的客观权重相结合,确定主观权重和客观权重;利用模糊数对专家打分进行综合,确定最终得分,二者结合构建露天矿山粉尘安全评价模型。以三个矿山为例,结果表明,A 1 矿山的露天矿山粉尘安全性明显优于其余两个矿山。研究表明,该模型适用于露天矿山粉尘安全评价,兼顾了主观性和客观性的典型特征,较好地反映了决策者的意图和指标的实际重要程度,使评价结果更加科学客观。所提出的方法为露天矿粉尘安全判定提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
25.80%
发文量
203
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信