Atrial function after percutaneous occluder device and suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis closure

C. Tarsia, C. Gaspardone, A. De Santis, E. D’Ascoli, F. Piccioni, G. Sgueglia, M. Iamele, S. Leonetti, Benedetta Giannico, A. Gaspardone
{"title":"Atrial function after percutaneous occluder device and suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis closure","authors":"C. Tarsia, C. Gaspardone, A. De Santis, E. D’Ascoli, F. Piccioni, G. Sgueglia, M. Iamele, S. Leonetti, Benedetta Giannico, A. Gaspardone","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyae008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis (PFO) closure is a recent technique, achieving closure by means of a simple suture. The differences between traditional occluders and suture might have different impacts on atrial function. The aim of this study was to evaluate atrial function after PFO closure by direct suture and traditional occluders.\n \n \n \n We prospectively studied 40 patients, 20 undergoing PFO closure by occluder and 20 by suture. Trans-thoracic echocardiography was carried out the day before and 1 year after the procedure. Left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) function was evaluated by using speckle-tracking analysis assessing the strain values of the reservoir (st-RES), conduit (st-CD), and contraction phase (st-CT). Compared with values baseline PFO closure, at 1-year follow-up, patients with occluder implantation had significantly worse indices of LA and RA reservoir (LA st-RES P < 0.001; RA st-RES P < 0.001), conduit (LA st-CD P < 0.001; RA st-CD P < 0.001), and contraction function (LA st-CT P < 0.05; RA st-CT P < 0.05). In patients with suture-mediated PFO closure, no significant differences were observed in the same indices of reservoir (LA st-RES P = 0.848; RA st-RES P = 0.183), conduit (LA st-CD P = 0.156; RA st-CD P = 0.419), and contraction function (LA st-CT P = 0.193; RA st-CT P = 0.375).\n \n \n \n Suture-mediated PFO closure does not alter atrial function. Conversely, PFO closure by metallic occluders is associated with a deterioration of atrial function. This detrimental effect on atrial function could favour the development of atrial arrhythmias.\n","PeriodicalId":508944,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Imaging Methods and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyae008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis (PFO) closure is a recent technique, achieving closure by means of a simple suture. The differences between traditional occluders and suture might have different impacts on atrial function. The aim of this study was to evaluate atrial function after PFO closure by direct suture and traditional occluders. We prospectively studied 40 patients, 20 undergoing PFO closure by occluder and 20 by suture. Trans-thoracic echocardiography was carried out the day before and 1 year after the procedure. Left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) function was evaluated by using speckle-tracking analysis assessing the strain values of the reservoir (st-RES), conduit (st-CD), and contraction phase (st-CT). Compared with values baseline PFO closure, at 1-year follow-up, patients with occluder implantation had significantly worse indices of LA and RA reservoir (LA st-RES P < 0.001; RA st-RES P < 0.001), conduit (LA st-CD P < 0.001; RA st-CD P < 0.001), and contraction function (LA st-CT P < 0.05; RA st-CT P < 0.05). In patients with suture-mediated PFO closure, no significant differences were observed in the same indices of reservoir (LA st-RES P = 0.848; RA st-RES P = 0.183), conduit (LA st-CD P = 0.156; RA st-CD P = 0.419), and contraction function (LA st-CT P = 0.193; RA st-CT P = 0.375). Suture-mediated PFO closure does not alter atrial function. Conversely, PFO closure by metallic occluders is associated with a deterioration of atrial function. This detrimental effect on atrial function could favour the development of atrial arrhythmias.
经皮闭塞器装置和缝线介导的卵圆窝闭合术后的心房功能
缝线介导的卵圆孔窝(PFO)闭合术是一种最新技术,通过简单的缝线实现闭合。传统封堵器与缝合器之间的差异可能会对心房功能产生不同的影响。本研究旨在评估直接缝合和传统封堵器关闭 PFO 后的心房功能。 我们对 40 名患者进行了前瞻性研究,其中 20 人接受了封堵器 PFO 封闭术,20 人接受了缝合术。手术前一天和术后一年进行了经胸超声心动图检查。采用斑点追踪分析法评估了左心房(LA)和右心房(RA)的功能,评估了储腔(st-RES)、导管(st-CD)和收缩期(st-CT)的应变值。与基线 PFO 关闭值相比,在 1 年的随访中,植入封堵器的患者的 LA 和 RA 储库指数(LA st-RES P < 0.001;RA st-RES P < 0.001)、导管指数(LA st-CD P < 0.001;RA st-CD P < 0.001)和收缩功能指数(LA st-CT P < 0.05;RA st-CT P < 0.05)明显降低。在缝合介导的 PFO 闭合患者中,储库(LA st-RES P = 0.848;RA st-RES P = 0.183)、导管(LA st-CD P = 0.156;RA st-CD P = 0.419)和收缩功能(LA st-CT P = 0.193;RA st-CT P = 0.375)的相同指数没有观察到显著差异。 缝合介导的 PFO 关闭不会改变心房功能。相反,用金属封堵器关闭 PFO 会导致心房功能恶化。这种对心房功能的不利影响可能会导致房性心律失常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信