In defence of the decriminalisation of drug possession in the UK

Alex Stevens, Niamh Eastwood, Kirstie Douse
{"title":"In defence of the decriminalisation of drug possession in the UK","authors":"Alex Stevens, Niamh Eastwood, Kirstie Douse","doi":"10.1177/20503245241239200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this review article, we develop the case for the decriminalisation of drug possession in the UK by describing our ‘modest proposal’ to repeal the relevant sections of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and its advantages. We defend this proposal against possible critiques from both conservative and radical positions. On the conservative side, these criticisms include that it would increase drug use and harm and that it would be illegal under international law. From the more radical position, we anticipate the criticisms that decriminalisation of possession would leave the harm associated with illegal drug supply to continue, that it would leave in place restrictions on the rights to use drugs, that it would forego the possible tax income from a legally regulated market, and that the drug laws would continue to act as tools of social control. In response, we argue that decriminalisation offers a feasible first step towards reducing the harm of drug control which would not increase drug-related harm.","PeriodicalId":92502,"journal":{"name":"Drug science, policy and law","volume":"88 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug science, policy and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503245241239200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this review article, we develop the case for the decriminalisation of drug possession in the UK by describing our ‘modest proposal’ to repeal the relevant sections of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and its advantages. We defend this proposal against possible critiques from both conservative and radical positions. On the conservative side, these criticisms include that it would increase drug use and harm and that it would be illegal under international law. From the more radical position, we anticipate the criticisms that decriminalisation of possession would leave the harm associated with illegal drug supply to continue, that it would leave in place restrictions on the rights to use drugs, that it would forego the possible tax income from a legally regulated market, and that the drug laws would continue to act as tools of social control. In response, we argue that decriminalisation offers a feasible first step towards reducing the harm of drug control which would not increase drug-related harm.
为英国毒品持有非刑罪化辩护
在这篇评论文章中,我们阐述了废除《1971 年滥用毒品法》相关条款的 "温和建议 "及其优势,从而为英国毒品持有非刑罪化提供依据。我们针对保守派和激进派可能提出的批评意见为这一建议辩护。在保守派方面,这些批评包括这会增加毒品的使用和危害,而且根据国际法,这将是非法的。从更激进的立场出发,我们预计会有这样的批评:持有毒品非刑罪化会让非法毒品供应带来的危害继续存在,会让使用毒品的权利受到限制,会放弃合法规范市场可能带来的税收收入,毒品法会继续充当社会控制的工具。对此,我们认为,非刑罪化为减少毒品管制的危害迈出了可行的第一步,它不会增加与毒品有关的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书