COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED FEMORAL NERVE BLOCK AND SYSTEMIC INTRAVENOUS ANALGESIA FOR PAIN RELIEF IN TRAUMATIC SHAFT FEMUR FRACTURES

Akanksha Monil Parsana, Ajay Kumar Verma, Roshni Gupta
{"title":"COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED FEMORAL NERVE BLOCK AND SYSTEMIC INTRAVENOUS ANALGESIA FOR PAIN RELIEF IN TRAUMATIC SHAFT FEMUR FRACTURES","authors":"Akanksha Monil Parsana, Ajay Kumar Verma, Roshni Gupta","doi":"10.36106/paripex/8900413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Aims and USG guided femoral nerve block is useful technique for pain relief in fracture shaft femur.\nObjective: 1) To study whether USG guided femoral nerve block is more effective in pain management of femoral shaft\nfractures than systemic intravenous analgesia. 2) To study the duration of action of femoral nerve block for pain relief in\nfemoral shaft fractures. 100 patients of ASA I and II, aged 20-50 years, with traumatic fracture Materials and Methods:\nfemur were randomly allocated to group FNB (n-50, USG guided femoral nerve block using 10 ml 0.75% Ropicvacaine)\nand group DICLO (n-50, systemic analgesia using Inj. Diclofenac 75 mg.) Each case was subsequently followed up for\nonset and total duration of analgesia till 6 hours postoperatively. Efficacy in both groups was assessed by visual analogue\nscale. There is no significant difference in onset of action between both the groups. The duration Results and Summary:\nof action in group FNB was more (5.58±1.08 hrs) than group DICLO (3.40±1.20 hrs). Visual analogue score showed\nsignificant pain reduction in group FNB after 15 minutes and also at 6hr(p=0.001) in comparison with group DICLO.\nConclusion: Femoral nerve block is safe, simple and more efficacious procedure in comparison to systemic IV\nanalgesia for acute pain management in patients with fracture shaft femur.","PeriodicalId":19910,"journal":{"name":"Paripex Indian Journal Of Research","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paripex Indian Journal Of Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/8900413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aims and USG guided femoral nerve block is useful technique for pain relief in fracture shaft femur. Objective: 1) To study whether USG guided femoral nerve block is more effective in pain management of femoral shaft fractures than systemic intravenous analgesia. 2) To study the duration of action of femoral nerve block for pain relief in femoral shaft fractures. 100 patients of ASA I and II, aged 20-50 years, with traumatic fracture Materials and Methods: femur were randomly allocated to group FNB (n-50, USG guided femoral nerve block using 10 ml 0.75% Ropicvacaine) and group DICLO (n-50, systemic analgesia using Inj. Diclofenac 75 mg.) Each case was subsequently followed up for onset and total duration of analgesia till 6 hours postoperatively. Efficacy in both groups was assessed by visual analogue scale. There is no significant difference in onset of action between both the groups. The duration Results and Summary: of action in group FNB was more (5.58±1.08 hrs) than group DICLO (3.40±1.20 hrs). Visual analogue score showed significant pain reduction in group FNB after 15 minutes and also at 6hr(p=0.001) in comparison with group DICLO. Conclusion: Femoral nerve block is safe, simple and more efficacious procedure in comparison to systemic IV analgesia for acute pain management in patients with fracture shaft femur.
比较超声引导下股神经阻滞和全身静脉镇痛在股骨创伤性骨折中的镇痛效果
背景目的:1)研究 USG 引导下的股神经阻滞在股骨干骨折的疼痛治疗中是否比全身静脉镇痛更有效。2)研究股神经阻滞缓解股骨干骨折疼痛的作用时间。材料和方法:将 100 名 ASA I 级和 II 级、年龄在 20-50 岁之间的创伤性骨折患者随机分配到 FNB 组(n-50,USG 引导下的股神经阻滞,使用 10 毫升 0.75% Ropicvacaine)和 DICLO 组(n-50,全身镇痛,使用注射用双氯芬酸 75 毫克。两组的疗效均通过视觉类比量表进行评估。两组的起效时间无明显差异。结果与总结:FNB 组的作用持续时间(5.58±1.08 小时)长于 DICLO 组(3.40±1.20 小时)。视觉模拟评分显示,与 DICLO 组相比,FNB 组在 15 分钟后和 6 小时后疼痛明显减轻(P=0.001):结论:与全身静脉镇痛相比,股神经阻滞术在股骨骨折患者的急性疼痛治疗中安全、简单、有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信