Relationship Between Airway Examination with LEMON Criteria and Difficulty of Tracheal Intubation with IDS Criteria

Q2 Medicine
Pooya Derakhshan, N. Nikoubakht, M. Alimian, Sadaf Mohammadi
{"title":"Relationship Between Airway Examination with LEMON Criteria and Difficulty of Tracheal Intubation with IDS Criteria","authors":"Pooya Derakhshan, N. Nikoubakht, M. Alimian, Sadaf Mohammadi","doi":"10.5812/aapm-142921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tracheal intubation is a common technique used to secure a patient’s airway, which is crucial in anesthesia. Successful tracheal intubation depends on various factors, including the assessment of the patient’s airway before the procedure. In recent years, scoring systems, such as LEMON (an acronym for the assessment of the airway’s appearance, identification of any dental issues, evaluation of Mallampati classification, assessment of airway obstruction, and examination of neck mobility) and intubation difficulty scale (IDS) have gained attention. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the LEMON criteria and IDS in tracheal intubation. The goal was to provide valuable insights that can assist medical professionals in optimizing their approach to airway management by analyzing clinical data, assessing patient outcomes, and evaluating the consistency between these scoring systems. Methods: This study was based on a descriptive-analytical study involving a group of patients requiring intubation. This study examined 105 patients scheduled for elective surgeries, aged between 19 and 60 years, without specific underlying diseases, such as laryngeal cancer, temporomandibular joint stiffness, or significant tongue enlargement, and with a body mass index (BMI) below 40 kg/m². Initially, expert anesthesiologists assessed the patients using the LEMON criteria, and then the degree of intubation difficulty was measured using the IDS scoring system. Finally, these two criteria were compared. Results: In this study, there was a significant correlation between the LEMON score and the IDS score (P < 0.001). The difficult intubation group (IDS score higher than 0) had higher LEMON scores (with the highest score equal to 4) than the non-difficult intubation group (IDS score of 0) (P = 0.017). The average LEMON and IDS scores were 3.11 and 1.35, respectively. Among the participants, 96.2% had an intubation difficulty score of ≤ 5; nevertheless, 3.8% had a score of > 5. Additionally, limited neck mobility emerged as the sole independent predictor of intubation difficulty (P = 0.002, odds ratio = 6.152). Conclusions: The LEMON score is associated with difficult intubation in adult patients requiring intubation.","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-142921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tracheal intubation is a common technique used to secure a patient’s airway, which is crucial in anesthesia. Successful tracheal intubation depends on various factors, including the assessment of the patient’s airway before the procedure. In recent years, scoring systems, such as LEMON (an acronym for the assessment of the airway’s appearance, identification of any dental issues, evaluation of Mallampati classification, assessment of airway obstruction, and examination of neck mobility) and intubation difficulty scale (IDS) have gained attention. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the LEMON criteria and IDS in tracheal intubation. The goal was to provide valuable insights that can assist medical professionals in optimizing their approach to airway management by analyzing clinical data, assessing patient outcomes, and evaluating the consistency between these scoring systems. Methods: This study was based on a descriptive-analytical study involving a group of patients requiring intubation. This study examined 105 patients scheduled for elective surgeries, aged between 19 and 60 years, without specific underlying diseases, such as laryngeal cancer, temporomandibular joint stiffness, or significant tongue enlargement, and with a body mass index (BMI) below 40 kg/m². Initially, expert anesthesiologists assessed the patients using the LEMON criteria, and then the degree of intubation difficulty was measured using the IDS scoring system. Finally, these two criteria were compared. Results: In this study, there was a significant correlation between the LEMON score and the IDS score (P < 0.001). The difficult intubation group (IDS score higher than 0) had higher LEMON scores (with the highest score equal to 4) than the non-difficult intubation group (IDS score of 0) (P = 0.017). The average LEMON and IDS scores were 3.11 and 1.35, respectively. Among the participants, 96.2% had an intubation difficulty score of ≤ 5; nevertheless, 3.8% had a score of > 5. Additionally, limited neck mobility emerged as the sole independent predictor of intubation difficulty (P = 0.002, odds ratio = 6.152). Conclusions: The LEMON score is associated with difficult intubation in adult patients requiring intubation.
采用 LEMON 标准进行气道检查与采用 IDS 标准进行气管插管难度之间的关系
背景:气管插管是确保患者气道安全的常用技术,在麻醉中至关重要。气管插管是否成功取决于多种因素,包括手术前对患者气道的评估。近年来,LEMON(气道外观评估、牙科问题识别、Mallampati 分级评估、气道阻塞评估和颈部活动度检查的缩写)和插管困难量表(IDS)等评分系统受到了关注。本研究旨在调查 LEMON 标准和 IDS 在气管插管中的关系。目的是通过分析临床数据、评估患者预后以及评价这些评分系统之间的一致性,提供有价值的见解,帮助医疗专业人员优化气道管理方法。方法:本研究基于一项描述性分析研究,涉及一组需要插管的患者。本研究对 105 名预定接受择期手术的患者进行了检查,这些患者的年龄在 19 岁至 60 岁之间,没有特殊的潜在疾病,如喉癌、颞下颌关节僵硬或舌头明显肿大,体重指数 (BMI) 低于 40 kg/m²。首先,麻醉专家使用 LEMON 标准对患者进行评估,然后使用 IDS 评分系统测量插管困难程度。最后,对这两种标准进行比较。结果:在本研究中,LEMON 评分与 IDS 评分之间存在显著相关性(P < 0.001)。困难插管组(IDS 评分高于 0 分)的 LEMON 评分(最高分等于 4 分)高于非困难插管组(IDS 评分为 0 分)(P = 0.017)。LEMON 和 IDS 平均得分分别为 3.11 分和 1.35 分。在参与者中,96.2%的人插管难度评分小于5分;然而,3.8%的人评分大于5分。此外,颈部活动度受限是插管困难的唯一独立预测因素(P = 0.002,几率比 = 6.152)。结论:在需要插管的成年患者中,LEMON 评分与插管困难有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信