Health impact pathways related to air quality changes: testing two health risk methodologies over a local traffic case study

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Carlos Silveira, Joana Ferreira, Ana I. Miranda
{"title":"Health impact pathways related to air quality changes: testing two health risk methodologies over a local traffic case study","authors":"Carlos Silveira,&nbsp;Joana Ferreira,&nbsp;Ana I. Miranda","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01504-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Air pollution causes damage and imposes risks on human health, especially in cities, where the pollutant load is a major concern, although the extent of these effects is still largely unknown. Thus, taking the busiest road traffic area in Portugal as a local case study (600 m × 600 m domain, 4 m<sup>2</sup> spatial resolution), the objective of this work was to investigate two health risk methodologies (linear and nonlinear), which were applied for estimating short-term health impacts related to daily variations of high-resolution ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations modelled for winter and summer periods. Both approaches are based on the same general equation and health input metrics, differing only in the relative risk calculation. Health outcomes, translated into the total number of cases and subsequent damage costs, were compared, and their associated uncertainties and challenges for health impact modelling were addressed. Overall, for the winter and summer periods, health outcomes considering the whole simulation domain were lower using the nonlinear methodology (less 27% and 28%, respectively). Spatially, these differences are more noticeable in locations with higher NO<sub>2</sub> and population values, where the highest health estimates were obtained. When the daily NO<sub>2</sub> exposure was less than 6 µg.m<sup>−3</sup>, a fact that occurred in 95% of the domain cells and in both periods, relatively small differences between approaches were found. Analysing the seasonality effect, total health impacts derived from the linear and nonlinear applications were greater in summer (around 18% in both approaches). This happens due to the magnitude and spatial variability of NO<sub>2</sub>, as the other health input metrics remained constant. This exploratory research in local scale health impact assessment (HIA) demonstrated that the use of refined input data could contribute to more accurate health estimates and that the nonlinear approach is probably the most suitable for characterising air pollution episodes, thus providing important support in HIA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"17 5","pages":"1077 - 1089"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01504-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Air pollution causes damage and imposes risks on human health, especially in cities, where the pollutant load is a major concern, although the extent of these effects is still largely unknown. Thus, taking the busiest road traffic area in Portugal as a local case study (600 m × 600 m domain, 4 m2 spatial resolution), the objective of this work was to investigate two health risk methodologies (linear and nonlinear), which were applied for estimating short-term health impacts related to daily variations of high-resolution ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations modelled for winter and summer periods. Both approaches are based on the same general equation and health input metrics, differing only in the relative risk calculation. Health outcomes, translated into the total number of cases and subsequent damage costs, were compared, and their associated uncertainties and challenges for health impact modelling were addressed. Overall, for the winter and summer periods, health outcomes considering the whole simulation domain were lower using the nonlinear methodology (less 27% and 28%, respectively). Spatially, these differences are more noticeable in locations with higher NO2 and population values, where the highest health estimates were obtained. When the daily NO2 exposure was less than 6 µg.m−3, a fact that occurred in 95% of the domain cells and in both periods, relatively small differences between approaches were found. Analysing the seasonality effect, total health impacts derived from the linear and nonlinear applications were greater in summer (around 18% in both approaches). This happens due to the magnitude and spatial variability of NO2, as the other health input metrics remained constant. This exploratory research in local scale health impact assessment (HIA) demonstrated that the use of refined input data could contribute to more accurate health estimates and that the nonlinear approach is probably the most suitable for characterising air pollution episodes, thus providing important support in HIA.

与空气质量变化有关的健康影响途径:通过地方交通案例研究测试两种健康风险方法
空气污染对人类健康造成损害和风险,特别是在城市中,污染物负荷是一个主要问题,尽管这些影响的程度在很大程度上仍不为人所知。因此,以葡萄牙最繁忙的道路交通区域作为本地案例研究(600 米 × 600 米域,4 平方米空间分辨率),这项工作的目标是研究两种健康风险方法(线性和非线性),并将其用于估算与高分辨率环境二氧化氮(NO2)浓度的日变化有关的冬季和夏季短期健康影响。这两种方法基于相同的一般方程和健康输入指标,仅在相对风险计算上有所不同。对转化为病例总数和后续损害成本的健康结果进行了比较,并探讨了其相关的不确定性和健康影响建模所面临的挑战。总体而言,在冬季和夏季,采用非线性方法计算的整个模拟域的健康结果较低(分别降低了 27% 和 28%)。从空间上看,这些差异在二氧化氮和人口值较高的地方更为明显,因为这些地方的健康估计值最高。当二氧化氮日暴露量小于 6 µg.m-3 时,95% 的域单元和两个时期都出现了这种情况,发现不同方法之间的差异相对较小。在分析季节性效应时,线性和非线性应用得出的总健康影响在夏季更大(两种方法均为 18%左右)。这是由于二氧化氮的大小和空间变化造成的,因为其他健康输入指标保持不变。这项地方尺度健康影响评估(HIA)的探索性研究表明,使用细化的输入数据有助于更准确地估计健康状况,非线性方法可能最适合描述空气污染事件,从而为健康影响评估提供重要支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health. It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes. International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements. This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信