Efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating low back and pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Aolin Zhang, Junwei Li, Tao He, Hongliang Xie, Xuanting Mou, Tsz Ching Yeung, Siming Chen, Chi Chiu Wang, Xiaohui Fan, Lu Li
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating low back and pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Aolin Zhang, Junwei Li, Tao He, Hongliang Xie, Xuanting Mou, Tsz Ching Yeung, Siming Chen, Chi Chiu Wang, Xiaohui Fan, Lu Li","doi":"10.1097/hm9.0000000000000093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Low back and pelvic girdle pain (LBPGP) is common during pregnancy. Acupuncture is an effective and safe therapy for pain relief. However, further evidence is required to confirm the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating LBPGP during pregnancy.\n \n \n \n This study aimed to systematically review and investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of pregnancy-related LBPGP.\n \n \n \n The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang databases were searched from January 2000 to August 2023. Only the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving pregnant women between 16 and 34 weeks of gestation diagnosed with LBPGP were included in the study. A meta-analysis was conducted and pooled risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared.\n \n \n \n Meta-analysis included 12 RCTs involving 1641 participants. Eleven trials compared acupuncture alone or acupuncture combined with standard care (SC), of which three trials also used nonpenetrating or placebo acupuncture as the control group. One trial compared acupuncture alone with nonpenetrating acupuncture. Compared with SC, acupuncture combined with SC group significantly decreased visual analog scale score (MD = −2.83, 95%CI = −3.41 to −2.26, P < 0.00001), cesarean section rate (RR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.49 to 0.97, P = 0.03), preterm birth rate (RR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.27 to 0.65, P < 0.0001), labor duration (MD = −1.97, 95%CI = −2.73 to −1.20, P < 0.0001), and Oswestry disability index score (MD = −9.14, 95%CI = −15.68 to −2.42, P =0.008). In addition, acupuncture combined with SC significantly improved SF-PCS. No significant differences were observed in the spontaneous delivery rate, newborn weight, drowsiness, and SF-MSC between the two groups. Adverse events such as needle pain and needle bleeding were aggravated in both the SC and acupuncture treatment groups but none were associated with acupuncture during or after the treatment period.\n \n \n \n Meta-analysis showed that acupuncture combined with SC had better efficacy than SC alone and could be a potential therapy for LBPGP during pregnancy. The safety results imply that acupuncture caused few adverse reactions; however, more evidence is required for further confirmation.\n","PeriodicalId":60507,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture and Herbal Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture and Herbal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/hm9.0000000000000093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low back and pelvic girdle pain (LBPGP) is common during pregnancy. Acupuncture is an effective and safe therapy for pain relief. However, further evidence is required to confirm the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in treating LBPGP during pregnancy. This study aimed to systematically review and investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of pregnancy-related LBPGP. The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang databases were searched from January 2000 to August 2023. Only the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving pregnant women between 16 and 34 weeks of gestation diagnosed with LBPGP were included in the study. A meta-analysis was conducted and pooled risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared. Meta-analysis included 12 RCTs involving 1641 participants. Eleven trials compared acupuncture alone or acupuncture combined with standard care (SC), of which three trials also used nonpenetrating or placebo acupuncture as the control group. One trial compared acupuncture alone with nonpenetrating acupuncture. Compared with SC, acupuncture combined with SC group significantly decreased visual analog scale score (MD = −2.83, 95%CI = −3.41 to −2.26, P < 0.00001), cesarean section rate (RR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.49 to 0.97, P = 0.03), preterm birth rate (RR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.27 to 0.65, P < 0.0001), labor duration (MD = −1.97, 95%CI = −2.73 to −1.20, P < 0.0001), and Oswestry disability index score (MD = −9.14, 95%CI = −15.68 to −2.42, P =0.008). In addition, acupuncture combined with SC significantly improved SF-PCS. No significant differences were observed in the spontaneous delivery rate, newborn weight, drowsiness, and SF-MSC between the two groups. Adverse events such as needle pain and needle bleeding were aggravated in both the SC and acupuncture treatment groups but none were associated with acupuncture during or after the treatment period. Meta-analysis showed that acupuncture combined with SC had better efficacy than SC alone and could be a potential therapy for LBPGP during pregnancy. The safety results imply that acupuncture caused few adverse reactions; however, more evidence is required for further confirmation.
针灸治疗孕期腰痛和骨盆腰痛的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
腰背和骨盆腰部疼痛(LBPGP)是孕期的常见病。针灸是一种有效、安全的止痛疗法。然而,针灸治疗妊娠期腰背盆骨痛的有效性和安全性还需要进一步的证据来证实。 本研究旨在系统回顾和调查针灸治疗妊娠相关 LBPGP 的临床疗效和安全性。 研究人员检索了2000年1月至2023年8月期间的PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、CNKI、VIP和万方数据库。研究只纳入了涉及妊娠16至34周、确诊患有LBPGP的孕妇的随机对照试验(RCT)。研究进行了荟萃分析,并比较了风险比(RRs)或平均差(MDs)及 95% 置信区间(CIs)。 荟萃分析包括 12 项 RCT,涉及 1641 名参与者。11 项试验比较了单独针灸或针灸与标准护理(SC)的结合,其中 3 项试验还使用了非穿刺针灸或安慰剂针灸作为对照组。一项试验对单独针灸和非穿刺针灸进行了比较。与标准护理相比,针灸联合标准护理组可显著降低视觉模拟量表评分(MD = -2.83,95%CI = -3.41 to -2.26,P < 0.00001)、剖宫产率(RR = 0.69,95%CI = 0.49 to 0.97,P = 0.03)、早产率(RR = 0.42,95%CI = 0.27 至 0.65,P<0.0001)、产程(MD =-1.97,95%CI = -2.73至-1.20,P<0.0001)和 Oswestry 残疾指数评分(MD = -9.14,95%CI = -15.68至-2.42,P =0.008)。此外,针灸结合SC能明显改善SF-PCS。两组间的自然分娩率、新生儿体重、嗜睡和 SF-MSC 均无明显差异。SC组和针灸治疗组的针刺疼痛和针刺出血等不良反应均有所加重,但在治疗期间或之后均未出现与针灸相关的不良反应。 Meta 分析表明,针灸联合 SC 的疗效优于单用 SC,可作为妊娠期 LBPGP 的一种潜在疗法。安全性结果表明针灸很少引起不良反应,但还需要更多的证据来进一步证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信