FORCE MAJEURE AND NOTARY RESPONSIBILITY: THE CASE OF THE DESTRUCTION OF DEED MINUTES

Nadia Mileni Habibah, Mohammad Hamidi Masykur, Diah Aju Wisnu Wardhani
{"title":"FORCE MAJEURE AND NOTARY RESPONSIBILITY: THE CASE OF THE DESTRUCTION OF DEED MINUTES","authors":"Nadia Mileni Habibah, Mohammad Hamidi Masykur, Diah Aju Wisnu Wardhani","doi":"10.52249/ilr.v4i1.241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Notaries, in carrying out their duties, have the authority to create authentic deeds, where authentic deeds serve as perfect evidence in court proceedings. According to Article 16 of the Notary Law (UUJN), the notary's obligation is not only to create authentic deeds but also to store them as part of the notary's protocol, which is a state document or archive that must be properly preserved and stored to prevent loss or destruction under any circumstances. The focus of this thesis is on the scenario where the notary's office, the place where all archives or protocols are stored, experiences a disaster or force majeure. The question arises whether the notary is still responsible for the destruction of the notarial protocol in such a case. The objective of this research is to examine and analyze the notary's responsibility for deed minutes that are destroyed due to force majeure and the legal construction of deed minute storage to minimize their loss due to force majeure. In this regard, concerning civil law liability, if the notary's negligence in safeguarding the notarial protocol results in losses for the parties involved, the notary's actions may be qualified as an Unlawful Act (PMH). PMH is regulated in Articles 1365 to 1367, stating that any unlawful act causing harm to others makes the perpetrator liable for the resulting losses. The legal consequences for a notary whose negligence leads to the loss or damage of deed minutes and failure to store them properly may result in administrative sanctions as stipulated in Article 9, paragraph (1), letter d of UUJN, which entails temporary suspension from the position of notary due to violating the obligations and prohibitions of the profession.","PeriodicalId":500708,"journal":{"name":"IBLAM Law Review","volume":"177 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IBLAM Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i1.241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Notaries, in carrying out their duties, have the authority to create authentic deeds, where authentic deeds serve as perfect evidence in court proceedings. According to Article 16 of the Notary Law (UUJN), the notary's obligation is not only to create authentic deeds but also to store them as part of the notary's protocol, which is a state document or archive that must be properly preserved and stored to prevent loss or destruction under any circumstances. The focus of this thesis is on the scenario where the notary's office, the place where all archives or protocols are stored, experiences a disaster or force majeure. The question arises whether the notary is still responsible for the destruction of the notarial protocol in such a case. The objective of this research is to examine and analyze the notary's responsibility for deed minutes that are destroyed due to force majeure and the legal construction of deed minute storage to minimize their loss due to force majeure. In this regard, concerning civil law liability, if the notary's negligence in safeguarding the notarial protocol results in losses for the parties involved, the notary's actions may be qualified as an Unlawful Act (PMH). PMH is regulated in Articles 1365 to 1367, stating that any unlawful act causing harm to others makes the perpetrator liable for the resulting losses. The legal consequences for a notary whose negligence leads to the loss or damage of deed minutes and failure to store them properly may result in administrative sanctions as stipulated in Article 9, paragraph (1), letter d of UUJN, which entails temporary suspension from the position of notary due to violating the obligations and prohibitions of the profession.
不可抗力与公证责任:销毁契约记录的案例
公证人在履行职责时有权制作真实的契约,真实的契约在法庭诉讼中是完美的证据。根据《公证法》(UUJN)第 16 条,公证人的义务不仅是制作真实契约,还要将其作为公证协议的一部分进行存储,公证协议是国家文件或档案,必须妥善保存和存储,以防止在任何情况下丢失或毁坏。本论文的重点是公证处(存放所有档案或协议的地方)遭遇灾难或不可抗力的情况。问题是,在这种情况下,公证人是否仍需对公证协议的销毁负责。本研究的目的是研究和分析公证人对因不可抗力而销毁的契约记录的责任,以及契约记录存储的法律构建,以尽量减少因不可抗力而造成的损失。在此方面,关于民法责任,如果公证人在保护公证协议方面的疏忽导致相关当事人遭受损失,则公证人的行为可被定性为非法行为(PMH)。第 1365 至 1367 条对非法行为做出了规定,指出任何对他人造成伤害的非法行为都会使行为人对由此造成的损失承担责任。UUJN 第 9 条第(1)款 d 项规定,公证人因疏忽导致契约记录遗失或损坏以及未能妥善保管契约记录,其法律 后果可能会受到行政处罚,即因违反职业义务和禁令而被暂时停止公证人职务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信