A review of using duckweed (Lemnaceae) in fish feeds

IF 8.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Jeremiah J. Minich, Todd P. Michael
{"title":"A review of using duckweed (Lemnaceae) in fish feeds","authors":"Jeremiah J. Minich,&nbsp;Todd P. Michael","doi":"10.1111/raq.12892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>One of the primary sustainability challenges in aquaculture is replacing fish meal with plant-based ingredients in aquafeeds. Plants are not optimal due to low protein content and antinutritional factors which can cause gut dysbiosis. Duckweed (<i>Lemnaceae</i>) is a family of aquatic plants with high protein content and has been used successfully for various types of animal feeds. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 58 papers, we summarize the extent by which duckweed has been used in fish production including the species of fish tested, the grow-out stage of fish, and method of application. Duckweed studies spanned a total of 18 species of fish (16 freshwater and two marine) that collectively are valued at 263 billion USD annually, and comprise 28% of total aquaculture production by mass. The average experiment length was 72 days (SD 42), primarily at the fingerling life stage. Duckweed was fed to the fish through live grazing, dried, and pelleted forms with 20% inclusion as the most common formulation. The <i>Lemna</i> spp., dominated by <i>L</i>. <i>minor</i>, <i>L</i>. <i>gibba</i>, and unknown <i>Lemna</i> species, were the most commonly used for feeds. <i>Spirodela polyrhiza</i> was the second most common. Duckweed inclusion levels between 15% and 30% were associated with positive outcomes on fish growth and feed conversion ratio without any negative impact on survival rates. Most duckweed species, especially from <i>Wollfiella</i> have not been tested as a fish feed but should be explored whereas most studies focused on freshwater fishes rather than marine.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 3","pages":"1212-1228"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the primary sustainability challenges in aquaculture is replacing fish meal with plant-based ingredients in aquafeeds. Plants are not optimal due to low protein content and antinutritional factors which can cause gut dysbiosis. Duckweed (Lemnaceae) is a family of aquatic plants with high protein content and has been used successfully for various types of animal feeds. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 58 papers, we summarize the extent by which duckweed has been used in fish production including the species of fish tested, the grow-out stage of fish, and method of application. Duckweed studies spanned a total of 18 species of fish (16 freshwater and two marine) that collectively are valued at 263 billion USD annually, and comprise 28% of total aquaculture production by mass. The average experiment length was 72 days (SD 42), primarily at the fingerling life stage. Duckweed was fed to the fish through live grazing, dried, and pelleted forms with 20% inclusion as the most common formulation. The Lemna spp., dominated by L. minor, L. gibba, and unknown Lemna species, were the most commonly used for feeds. Spirodela polyrhiza was the second most common. Duckweed inclusion levels between 15% and 30% were associated with positive outcomes on fish growth and feed conversion ratio without any negative impact on survival rates. Most duckweed species, especially from Wollfiella have not been tested as a fish feed but should be explored whereas most studies focused on freshwater fishes rather than marine.

在鱼饲料中使用浮萍(Lemnaceae)的综述
水产养殖业在可持续发展方面面临的主要挑战之一是在水产饲料中用植物性成分替代鱼粉。植物由于蛋白质含量低、抗营养因子多,可能导致肠道菌群失调,因此不是最佳选择。鸭茅(鸭茅科)是水生植物家族中蛋白质含量较高的一种,已被成功用于各种动物饲料。在这篇对 58 篇论文进行的系统回顾和荟萃分析中,我们总结了浮萍在鱼类生产中的应用程度,包括测试的鱼类种类、鱼类的生长阶段和应用方法。浮萍研究共涉及 18 种鱼类(16 种淡水鱼和 2 种海水鱼),这些鱼类每年的总价值为 2630 亿美元,占水产养殖总产量的 28%。平均实验时间为 72 天(SD 42),主要是在鱼苗生命阶段。浮萍通过活草、干浮萍和颗粒浮萍的形式喂鱼,最常见的配方是添加 20% 的浮萍。最常用的饲料是 Lemna 属,主要是 L. minor、L. gibba 和未知的 Lemna 种类。Spirodela polyrhiza 是第二常用的。浮萍添加量在 15%到 30%之间,对鱼类生长和饲料转化率有积极影响,但对存活率没有任何负面影响。大多数浮萍物种,尤其是 Wollfiella 中的浮萍物种,还没有作为鱼饲料进行过测试,但应该进行探索,因为大多数研究侧重于淡水鱼而不是海水鱼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.80
自引率
5.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Aquaculture is a journal that aims to provide a platform for reviews on various aspects of aquaculture science, techniques, policies, and planning. The journal publishes fully peer-reviewed review articles on topics including global, regional, and national production and market trends in aquaculture, advancements in aquaculture practices and technology, interactions between aquaculture and the environment, indigenous and alien species in aquaculture, genetics and its relation to aquaculture, as well as aquaculture product quality and traceability. The journal is indexed and abstracted in several databases including AgBiotech News & Information (CABI), AgBiotechNet, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Environment Index (EBSCO Publishing), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信