Xianju Huang, Beibei Bi, Xinle Lu, Ludan Chao, Qiuying Cui
{"title":"Effect of Low-Quality Embryo on Adverse Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes","authors":"Xianju Huang, Beibei Bi, Xinle Lu, Ludan Chao, Qiuying Cui","doi":"10.22158/rhs.v9n1p37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This retrospective study focused on whether low-quality embryos have the risk on perinatal and obstetric outcomes. Methods: This study enrolled 600 women undergoing fresh embryos transfer (ET) cycles between June 2019 and December 2022. The patients were stratified into two groups, high-quality embryo group and low-quality embryo group. In both groups, the perinatal and obstetric outcomes were the primary outcomes. Moreover, we conducted a multi-variable logistic regression analysis, where additional possible confounding factors were controlled, to determine how diverse embryo qualities affected the primary outcomes. Results: The results showed that compared with the low-quality group, the high-quality group showed increased clinical pregnancy (63.33% vs 26.33%) as well as a higher number of live birth rates (52.67% vs 18.33%) (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in unfavorable perinatal and obstetric outcomes between high- and low-quality groups (p>0.05). Similarly, the transfer of blastocysts developing from high-quality embryos led to increased clinical pregnancy rates (84.50% vs 48.05%, p<0.001) and live birth rates (74.64% vs 38.96%, p<0.001). Transfer of blastocysts developing from low-quality embryos did not impact the unfavorable perinatal or obstetric outcomes. The logistic regression analysis showed that low-quality could not increase the unfavorable perinatal or obstetric outcomes. Conclusion: In summary, low-quality ET does not increase the risk of unfavorable perinatal or obstetric outcomes. Overall, compared to low-quality embryos, the transfer of high-quality embryos increases the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.","PeriodicalId":74678,"journal":{"name":"Research in health science","volume":"80 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/rhs.v9n1p37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This retrospective study focused on whether low-quality embryos have the risk on perinatal and obstetric outcomes. Methods: This study enrolled 600 women undergoing fresh embryos transfer (ET) cycles between June 2019 and December 2022. The patients were stratified into two groups, high-quality embryo group and low-quality embryo group. In both groups, the perinatal and obstetric outcomes were the primary outcomes. Moreover, we conducted a multi-variable logistic regression analysis, where additional possible confounding factors were controlled, to determine how diverse embryo qualities affected the primary outcomes. Results: The results showed that compared with the low-quality group, the high-quality group showed increased clinical pregnancy (63.33% vs 26.33%) as well as a higher number of live birth rates (52.67% vs 18.33%) (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in unfavorable perinatal and obstetric outcomes between high- and low-quality groups (p>0.05). Similarly, the transfer of blastocysts developing from high-quality embryos led to increased clinical pregnancy rates (84.50% vs 48.05%, p<0.001) and live birth rates (74.64% vs 38.96%, p<0.001). Transfer of blastocysts developing from low-quality embryos did not impact the unfavorable perinatal or obstetric outcomes. The logistic regression analysis showed that low-quality could not increase the unfavorable perinatal or obstetric outcomes. Conclusion: In summary, low-quality ET does not increase the risk of unfavorable perinatal or obstetric outcomes. Overall, compared to low-quality embryos, the transfer of high-quality embryos increases the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.
研究背景这项回顾性研究的重点是低质量胚胎是否会对围产期和产科结果造成风险。研究方法本研究招募了 600 名在 2019 年 6 月至 2022 年 12 月期间接受新鲜胚胎移植(ET)周期的女性。患者被分为两组,即优质胚胎组和劣质胚胎组。两组患者的围产期和产科结果均为主要结果。此外,我们还进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,控制了其他可能的混杂因素,以确定不同胚胎质量对主要结果的影响。结果显示结果显示,与低质量组相比,高质量组的临床妊娠率(63.33% vs 26.33%)和活产率(52.67% vs 18.33%)均有所提高(P<0.001)。在围产期和产科不良结局方面,高质量组和低质量组之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。同样,移植高质量胚胎发育的囊胚可提高临床妊娠率(84.50% vs 48.05%,P<0.001)和活产率(74.64% vs 38.96%,P<0.001)。移植由低质量胚胎发育而成的囊胚对围产期或产科不良后果没有影响。逻辑回归分析表明,低质量胚胎不会增加不利的围产期或产科结果。结论总之,低质量 ET 不会增加围产期或产科不良结局的风险。总体而言,与低质量胚胎相比,移植高质量胚胎可提高临床妊娠率和活产率。