Implementing ‘Gender in Research’ as Inclusive Excellence Indicator – Practices in peer review panels

Helene Schiffbänker
{"title":"Implementing ‘Gender in Research’ as Inclusive Excellence Indicator – Practices in peer review panels","authors":"Helene Schiffbänker","doi":"10.55835/64425f1ea45f9765a1e48751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research funding organisations (RFOs) are key actors for guiding and reforming the assessment of grant applications. To mitigate gender bias, many RFOs have various policies in place. But how are formal gender equality policies implemented in practice by peer review panels? We analyse how one policy, incorporating the sex and gender dimension in research content and innovation (GiRI), is assessed in practice.\nCase studies were conducted in selected national RFOs which have implemented GiRI as an element of excellence. Data was collected through panel observations and interviews with staff and reviewers. By bringing in the reviewers’ perspective, we gain insights into how they perceive and discuss this excellence indicator, can identify various assessment practices and ultimately contribute to ongoing discussions on reconstructing excellence and fostering inclusiveness in science. The practical experiences might help RFOs to establish appropriate indicators to measure and monitor progress and fine-tune the policy.","PeriodicalId":334841,"journal":{"name":"27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023)","volume":"69 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55835/64425f1ea45f9765a1e48751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research funding organisations (RFOs) are key actors for guiding and reforming the assessment of grant applications. To mitigate gender bias, many RFOs have various policies in place. But how are formal gender equality policies implemented in practice by peer review panels? We analyse how one policy, incorporating the sex and gender dimension in research content and innovation (GiRI), is assessed in practice. Case studies were conducted in selected national RFOs which have implemented GiRI as an element of excellence. Data was collected through panel observations and interviews with staff and reviewers. By bringing in the reviewers’ perspective, we gain insights into how they perceive and discuss this excellence indicator, can identify various assessment practices and ultimately contribute to ongoing discussions on reconstructing excellence and fostering inclusiveness in science. The practical experiences might help RFOs to establish appropriate indicators to measure and monitor progress and fine-tune the policy.
将 "研究中的性别问题 "作为包容性卓越指标--同行评审小组的做法
研究资助组织(RFOs)是指导和改革资助申请评估工作的主要参与者。为了减少性别偏见,许多 RFO 制定了各种政策。但是,同行评审小组在实践中是如何执行正式的性别平等政策的呢?我们分析了在研究内容与创新(GiRI)中纳入性与性别维度的一项政策在实践中是如何进行评估的。通过小组观察以及与工作人员和评审员的访谈收集数据。通过引入评审员的视角,我们深入了解了他们是如何看待和讨论这一卓越指标的,可以确定各种评估做法,并最终为正在进行的关于重建卓越和促进科学包容性的讨论做出贡献。这些实践经验可能有助于区 域组织制定适当的指标来衡量和监测进展情况,并对政策进行微调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信