Effects of payment for ecosystem services and tourism on conservation and development: Trade-off or synergistic?

IF 16.4 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1175/ei-d-23-0014.1

Yujun Wang, Hongbo Yang, Vanessa Hull, Jindong Zhang, Xiaodong Chen, Xiang Li, Zejun Zhang, Cheng Li, Fang Wang, Zhiqiang Zhao, Ying Tang, Jianguo Liu

{"title":"Effects of payment for ecosystem services and tourism on conservation and development: Trade-off or synergistic?","authors":"Yujun Wang, Hongbo Yang, Vanessa Hull, Jindong Zhang, Xiaodong Chen, Xiang Li, Zejun Zhang, Cheng Li, Fang Wang, Zhiqiang Zhao, Ying Tang, Jianguo Liu","doi":"10.1175/ei-d-23-0014.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe effects of various strategies aimed at simultaneously promoting environmental conservation and human development are closely related to the sustainable development regionally and globally. However, despite the effects of many such strategies have been evaluated by ecologists and sociologists separately, their ability to simultaneously meet these two anticipated goals (i.e., environmental conservation and human development) at the fine spatial scale remains vague. To answer this fundamental but crucial question, incorporating household and forest change data, we concurrently estimated the ecological and socioeconomic effects of two world-renowned Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs (i.e., the Nature Forest Conservation Program, the Grain to Green Program) and nature-based tourism in 30 protected areas across 8 provinces in China. Here we showed a trade-off between the ecological and economic effects of two PES programs, while synergistic effects exist in the ecological and economic benefit of tourism. Attributes of household and protected area significantly influenced economic and environmental benefit as well. Our research provided new insights into the complex effects of PES programs and tourism, and crucial information to support their adequate and sustainable implementation in China and the rest of the world.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/ei-d-23-0014.1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of various strategies aimed at simultaneously promoting environmental conservation and human development are closely related to the sustainable development regionally and globally. However, despite the effects of many such strategies have been evaluated by ecologists and sociologists separately, their ability to simultaneously meet these two anticipated goals (i.e., environmental conservation and human development) at the fine spatial scale remains vague. To answer this fundamental but crucial question, incorporating household and forest change data, we concurrently estimated the ecological and socioeconomic effects of two world-renowned Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) programs (i.e., the Nature Forest Conservation Program, the Grain to Green Program) and nature-based tourism in 30 protected areas across 8 provinces in China. Here we showed a trade-off between the ecological and economic effects of two PES programs, while synergistic effects exist in the ecological and economic benefit of tourism. Attributes of household and protected area significantly influenced economic and environmental benefit as well. Our research provided new insights into the complex effects of PES programs and tourism, and crucial information to support their adequate and sustainable implementation in China and the rest of the world.

查看原文本刊更多论文

生态系统服务付费和旅游业对保护和发展的影响：权衡还是协同？

旨在同时促进环境保护和人类发展的各种战略的效果与地区和全球的可持续发展密切相关。然而，尽管生态学家和社会学家分别对许多此类战略的效果进行了评估，但它们在精细空间尺度上同时实现这两个预期目标（即环境保护和人类发展）的能力仍然模糊不清。为了回答这个基本而又关键的问题，我们结合家庭和森林变化数据，在中国 8 个省的 30 个保护区内同时估算了两个世界知名的生态系统服务补偿项目（即大自然森林保护项目和退耕还林项目）和以自然为基础的旅游业对生态和社会经济的影响。结果表明，两个生态系统服务补偿项目的生态效应和经济效应之间存在权衡，而旅游业的生态效益和经济效益之间存在协同效应。家庭和保护区的属性对经济和环境效益也有显著影响。我们的研究为生态系统服务补偿项目和旅游业的复杂效应提供了新的视角，并为在中国和世界其他地区充分、可持续地实施生态系统服务补偿项目提供了重要信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.