Students’ and lecturers’ experiences in courses provided for the English thesis defense examinations

Q1 Arts and Humanities
I. A. Samad, Siti Sarah Fitriani, Singhanat Nomnian, Syamsul Bahri Ys, Sofia Sofia
{"title":"Students’ and lecturers’ experiences in courses provided for the English thesis defense examinations","authors":"I. A. Samad, Siti Sarah Fitriani, Singhanat Nomnian, Syamsul Bahri Ys, Sofia Sofia","doi":"10.24815/siele.v11i1.33080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thesis Defense Examination (TDE) is an assessment that most undergraduate students around the world have to pass in order to graduate from universities. Some students can pass the examination satisfactorily, while others fail due to their poor performance. In the EFL general context, the issue of poor performance of undergraduate students in the TDE conducted in English is a piece of common knowledge among lecturers as the examiners and students as the examinees. Within the Indonesian context, this study aims at investigating students and lecturers’ experiences in Research Methodology (RM) (focusing on written competence) and Seminar on ELT (SoELT) (focusing on oral competence) courses, where the case was taken from the English Education Department of a public university located in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. By using a purposive sampling technique, we involved five students who have passed RM and SoELT, two lecturers who teach RM, and two lecturers who teach SoELT as the participants in this qualitative research. Interviews were employed to gather the data to address the investigation. We consulted Hyland (2004) for the analysis of the teaching and learning of written competence, and Alptekin (2002) to analyze the teaching and learning of oral competence in classroom activities. The results of the analysis show that there are matches and mismatches between what was experienced by the students and what the lecturers experienced. We also found that some activities in the courses hindered students from being competent in their performance in TDE.","PeriodicalId":36412,"journal":{"name":"Studies in English Language and Education","volume":"881 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in English Language and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i1.33080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thesis Defense Examination (TDE) is an assessment that most undergraduate students around the world have to pass in order to graduate from universities. Some students can pass the examination satisfactorily, while others fail due to their poor performance. In the EFL general context, the issue of poor performance of undergraduate students in the TDE conducted in English is a piece of common knowledge among lecturers as the examiners and students as the examinees. Within the Indonesian context, this study aims at investigating students and lecturers’ experiences in Research Methodology (RM) (focusing on written competence) and Seminar on ELT (SoELT) (focusing on oral competence) courses, where the case was taken from the English Education Department of a public university located in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. By using a purposive sampling technique, we involved five students who have passed RM and SoELT, two lecturers who teach RM, and two lecturers who teach SoELT as the participants in this qualitative research. Interviews were employed to gather the data to address the investigation. We consulted Hyland (2004) for the analysis of the teaching and learning of written competence, and Alptekin (2002) to analyze the teaching and learning of oral competence in classroom activities. The results of the analysis show that there are matches and mismatches between what was experienced by the students and what the lecturers experienced. We also found that some activities in the courses hindered students from being competent in their performance in TDE.
学生和讲师在为英语论文答辩考试提供的课程中的经验
论文答辩考试(TDE)是世界上大多数大学本科生毕业时必须通过的一项考核。有些学生能顺利通过考试,而有些学生则因成绩不佳而不及格。在 EFL 的大背景下,本科生在用英语进行的 TDE 考试中成绩不佳的问题是作为考官的讲师和作为考生的学生之间的共识。在印度尼西亚的背景下,本研究旨在调查学生和讲师在研究方法(RM)(侧重于书面能力)和英语语言教学研讨会(SoELT)(侧重于口语能力)课程中的经验,案例来自印度尼西亚班达亚齐一所公立大学的英语教育系。通过有目的的抽样技术,我们将五名通过 RM 和 SoELT 考试的学生、两名教授 RM 课程的讲师和两名教授 SoELT 课程的讲师作为本次定性研究的参与者。我们采用访谈的方式收集数据,以解决调查问题。我们参考了 Hyland(2004 年)对书面能力教与学的分析,以及 Alptekin(2002 年)对课堂活动中口语能力教与学的分析。分析结果表明,学生的体验与授课教师的体验之间既有匹配,也有不匹配。我们还发现,课程中的一些活动阻碍了学生在 TDE 中的能力表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in English Language and Education
Studies in English Language and Education Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信