THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONFISCATION IN CORRUPTION CRIMES

IBLAM Law Review Pub Date : 2024-01-31 DOI:10.52249/ilr.v4i1.299

Mubarooq Ilahi, Frans Simangunsong

{"title":"THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONFISCATION IN CORRUPTION CRIMES","authors":"Mubarooq Ilahi, Frans Simangunsong","doi":"10.52249/ilr.v4i1.299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue is about the basis of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission to confiscate corruption crimes that have not been enforced by permanent law (inkrach) from the district court. This study aims to find out what is the basis for the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission to confiscate in corruption crimes and how the legal position of seized goods in corruption crimes. By using normative research methods, it can be concluded that: 1. The basis of authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission is Law Number 30 of 2002 Article 47 paragraph 1 of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission and Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the eradication of corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption crimes. 2. The legal position of confiscated goods will certainly be used as evidence by the Corruption Eradication Commission as law enforcement. However, there are often obstacles in the management of confiscated goods. Then confiscated goods can also be auctioned even though there has been no permanent force legal decision (inkrach) from the district court.","PeriodicalId":500708,"journal":{"name":"IBLAM Law Review","volume":"54 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IBLAM Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i1.299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue is about the basis of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission to confiscate corruption crimes that have not been enforced by permanent law (inkrach) from the district court. This study aims to find out what is the basis for the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission to confiscate in corruption crimes and how the legal position of seized goods in corruption crimes. By using normative research methods, it can be concluded that: 1. The basis of authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission is Law Number 30 of 2002 Article 47 paragraph 1 of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission and Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the eradication of corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption crimes. 2. The legal position of confiscated goods will certainly be used as evidence by the Corruption Eradication Commission as law enforcement. However, there are often obstacles in the management of confiscated goods. Then confiscated goods can also be auctioned even though there has been no permanent force legal decision (inkrach) from the district court.

查看原文本刊更多论文

根除腐败委员会在腐败犯罪中实施没收的权力基础

该问题涉及消除腐败委员会从地方法院没收未被永久性法律（inkrach）强制执行的腐败犯罪物品的权力依据。本研究旨在找出消除腐败委员会没收腐败犯罪物品的权力依据是什么，以及腐败犯罪物品被没收后的法律地位如何。通过使用规范研究方法，可以得出以下结论：1.1. 根除腐败委员会的权力依据是 2002 年第 30 号法律中关于根除腐败委员会的第 47 条第 1 款和 1999 年第 31 号法律中关于根除腐败的 2001 年第 20 号法律中关于根除腐败犯罪的 1999 年第 31 号法律修正案中关于根除腐败的 1999 年第 31 号法律。2.2. 没收物品的法律地位肯定会被根除腐败委员会用作执法证据。但是，没收物品的管理往往存在障碍。那么，即使地方法院没有作出永久生效的法律裁决（inkrach），没收物品也可以进行拍卖。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

IBLAM Law Review

自引率

0.00%

发文量