Water Absorption and 3D Expansion of Different Injectable Hyaluronic Acids

Mariana Brito da Cruz
{"title":"Water Absorption and 3D Expansion of Different Injectable Hyaluronic Acids","authors":"Mariana Brito da Cruz","doi":"10.47363/jdmrs/2024(5)150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hyaluronic acid’s water absorption and expansion capacities define a filler’s ability to lift the tissues. Therefore, studying these properties is essential to better understand filler’s clinical performance. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare water absorption and expansion (bidimensional and three-dimensional) of five Fillmed fillers (Universal, Fine Lines, Volume, Lips and Lips Soft). Water absorption was measured through swelling ratio 24 hours post-hydration. For two-dimensional expansion, samples were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively, using calibrated photographs, before and two hours after hydration. Three-dimensional volume was evaluated before and immediately after injecting the fillers, and 30 minutes, 2 hours and 24 hours post-injection in ex vivo pig skin. The tissue was scanned with the 3Shape TRIOS scanner and resulting STL files were compared. Group comparisons were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA test, and a p-value ≤ 0,05 was established. Lips showed a statistically higher swelling ratio than other fillers (p < 0,05). Fine Lines had the lowest swelling ratio, even if only statistically significant when compared to Universal (p= 0,021). Fine Lines had a significantly higher initial bidimensional width than all fillers (p <0,05) except Lips Soft. 24 hours post-injection, Fine Lines had the highest three-dimensional volume, which was statistically higher than Volume’s (p= 0,049). All fillers absorbed water and expanded, with Fine Lines tending to have the highest three-dimensional expansion, despite its lowest viscosity and water absorption. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to investigate the influence of other properties over water absorption and expansion.","PeriodicalId":203275,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatology Research Reviews &amp; Reports","volume":"639 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatology Research Reviews &amp; Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jdmrs/2024(5)150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hyaluronic acid’s water absorption and expansion capacities define a filler’s ability to lift the tissues. Therefore, studying these properties is essential to better understand filler’s clinical performance. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare water absorption and expansion (bidimensional and three-dimensional) of five Fillmed fillers (Universal, Fine Lines, Volume, Lips and Lips Soft). Water absorption was measured through swelling ratio 24 hours post-hydration. For two-dimensional expansion, samples were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively, using calibrated photographs, before and two hours after hydration. Three-dimensional volume was evaluated before and immediately after injecting the fillers, and 30 minutes, 2 hours and 24 hours post-injection in ex vivo pig skin. The tissue was scanned with the 3Shape TRIOS scanner and resulting STL files were compared. Group comparisons were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA test, and a p-value ≤ 0,05 was established. Lips showed a statistically higher swelling ratio than other fillers (p < 0,05). Fine Lines had the lowest swelling ratio, even if only statistically significant when compared to Universal (p= 0,021). Fine Lines had a significantly higher initial bidimensional width than all fillers (p <0,05) except Lips Soft. 24 hours post-injection, Fine Lines had the highest three-dimensional volume, which was statistically higher than Volume’s (p= 0,049). All fillers absorbed water and expanded, with Fine Lines tending to have the highest three-dimensional expansion, despite its lowest viscosity and water absorption. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to investigate the influence of other properties over water absorption and expansion.
不同注射用透明质酸的吸水性和三维扩展性
透明质酸的吸水和膨胀能力决定了填充剂提升组织的能力。因此,研究这些特性对于更好地了解填充剂的临床表现至关重要。本研究的目的是评估和比较五种 Fillmed 填充剂(通用型、细纹型、丰盈型、唇型和软唇型)的吸水性和膨胀性(二维和三维)。吸水率通过水化后 24 小时的膨胀率来测量。对于二维膨胀,在水合前和水合后两小时,使用校准照片对样本进行定量和定性分析。在注射填充剂之前和之后,以及注射后 30 分钟、2 小时和 24 小时内,对活体猪皮的三维体积进行了评估。使用 3Shape TRIOS 扫描仪对组织进行扫描,并对生成的 STL 文件进行比较。组间比较采用单因素方差分析,P 值≤ 0.05。据统计,唇部的肿胀率高于其他填充物(p < 0,05)。Fine Lines 的肿胀率最低,即使与 Universal 相比也只有统计学意义(p= 0,021)。除 Lips Soft 外,Fine Lines 的初始二维宽度明显高于其他填充剂(p <0,05)。注射后 24 小时,Fine Lines 的三维体积最大,在统计学上高于 Volume(p= 0,049)。所有填充剂都会吸水膨胀,尽管 Fine Lines 的粘度和吸水率最低,但其三维膨胀率却最高。还需要进行更大规模的样本研究,以调查其他特性对吸水率和膨胀率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信