The Analysis of Understanding in Seismic – Resilient Infrastructure Planning in Vocational Student’s Civil Engineering

Lisherly Reginancy Debataraja, Oktavia Ully Artha Silalahi, Fenny Novita Meysabed Sianturi, Pagit Juni Sartika Br Tarigan, Dine Noviandri Badriansyah
{"title":"The Analysis of Understanding in Seismic – Resilient Infrastructure Planning in Vocational Student’s Civil Engineering","authors":"Lisherly Reginancy Debataraja, Oktavia Ully Artha Silalahi, Fenny Novita Meysabed Sianturi, Pagit Juni Sartika Br Tarigan, Dine Noviandri Badriansyah","doi":"10.53893/ijrvocas.v3i4.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of understanding in Seismic-Resilient Infrastructure Planning among vocational students in civil engineering is indispensable for multifaceted reasons. This study employs a questionnaire validation test as a means of data collection, utilizing questionnaires to gather information. Simple random sampling was applied to select respondents from Medan State Polytechnic students in their 5th and 7th semesters. The questionnaire is designed to assess students' knowledge of earthquake-resistant infrastructure planning. The research is structured into three segments, focusing on the understanding of earthquake resistance management, structural earthquake resistance, and infrastructure earthquake resistance. The aspect of management seismic resilience understanding ranges from 3.22% to 9.65%. The highest understanding is observed in the awareness of quality control activities, the fifth assessment (9.65%). The lowest understanding is in reduce errors in the implementation of earthquake-resistant construction, the nineth assessment (3.22%). The aspect of structure seismic resilience understanding ranges from 2.78% to 9.48%. The highest understanding is observed in threaded reinforcement, the fourth assessment (9.48%). The lowest understanding is in earthquake-resistant house construction, the seventh assessment (2.78%). The aspect of infrastructure seismic resilience understanding ranges from 5.57% to 15.83%., The highest understanding is observed in earthquake-resistant foundations, the second assessment (15.83%). The lowest understanding is in post-disaster assessment approach, the fifth assessment (5.57%). These percentages likely represent the level of comprehension or proficiency of students in each respective aspect, with higher percentages indicating a better understanding. It is crucial to analyze these results collectively and over time to identify trends, strengths, and areas for improvement in the seismic resilience education provided to vocational civil engineering students.","PeriodicalId":14205,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Vocational Studies (IJRVOCAS)","volume":"38 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Vocational Studies (IJRVOCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53893/ijrvocas.v3i4.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analysis of understanding in Seismic-Resilient Infrastructure Planning among vocational students in civil engineering is indispensable for multifaceted reasons. This study employs a questionnaire validation test as a means of data collection, utilizing questionnaires to gather information. Simple random sampling was applied to select respondents from Medan State Polytechnic students in their 5th and 7th semesters. The questionnaire is designed to assess students' knowledge of earthquake-resistant infrastructure planning. The research is structured into three segments, focusing on the understanding of earthquake resistance management, structural earthquake resistance, and infrastructure earthquake resistance. The aspect of management seismic resilience understanding ranges from 3.22% to 9.65%. The highest understanding is observed in the awareness of quality control activities, the fifth assessment (9.65%). The lowest understanding is in reduce errors in the implementation of earthquake-resistant construction, the nineth assessment (3.22%). The aspect of structure seismic resilience understanding ranges from 2.78% to 9.48%. The highest understanding is observed in threaded reinforcement, the fourth assessment (9.48%). The lowest understanding is in earthquake-resistant house construction, the seventh assessment (2.78%). The aspect of infrastructure seismic resilience understanding ranges from 5.57% to 15.83%., The highest understanding is observed in earthquake-resistant foundations, the second assessment (15.83%). The lowest understanding is in post-disaster assessment approach, the fifth assessment (5.57%). These percentages likely represent the level of comprehension or proficiency of students in each respective aspect, with higher percentages indicating a better understanding. It is crucial to analyze these results collectively and over time to identify trends, strengths, and areas for improvement in the seismic resilience education provided to vocational civil engineering students.
土木工程专业学生对抗震基础设施规划的理解分析
出于多方面的原因,分析土木工程专业职业学生对抗震基础设施规划的理解是不可或缺的。本研究采用问卷验证测试作为数据收集手段,利用问卷收集信息。简单随机抽样从棉兰州立理工学院第五和第七学期的学生中选取受访者。问卷旨在评估学生对抗震基础设施规划的了解程度。研究分为三个部分,分别侧重于对抗震管理、结构抗震和基础设施抗震的理解。对抗震管理的了解程度从 3.22%到 9.65%不等。理解程度最高的是对质量控制活动的认识,即第五项评估(9.65%)。对减少抗震建筑实施过程中的失误的理解程度最低,为第 9 次评估(3.22%)。对结构抗震能力的了解程度从 2.78%到 9.48%不等。对螺纹加固的理解程度最高,排在第四位(9.48%)。对抗震房屋建筑的了解最少,排在第七位(2.78%)。对基础设施抗震能力的了解程度从 5.57% 到 15.83% 不等,对抗震地基的了解程度最高,为第二次评估(15.83%)。对灾后评估方法的理解程度最低,为第五项评估(5.57%)。这些百分比可能代表了学生在各方面的理解或熟练程度,百分比越高,说明理解越好。至关重要的是,要对这些结果进行综合分析,并随着时间的推移,找出为土木工程专业学生提供的抗震教育的趋势、优势和需要改进的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信