COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MEN FERTILITY WITH DIFFERENT METHODS OF HERNIOPLASTY

Magomedov M.M., Khamidov M.A., Damadaev D.M.
{"title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MEN FERTILITY WITH DIFFERENT METHODS OF HERNIOPLASTY","authors":"Magomedov M.M., Khamidov M.A., Damadaev D.M.","doi":"10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2024-26-1-34-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Male infertility is a rare, but at the same time underestimated complication of inguinal hernia repair.\nAim. To compare the results of hernia repair in reproductive men using transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair (TAPP) and the Lichtenstein method.\nMaterial and methods. The study involved 56 male patients aged 18 to 45 years who were operated on for a primary inguinal hernia. All patients were divided into two groups. The first group included 29 patients operated on using the Lichtenstein method. The second group included 27 patients operated on using the TAPP technique. Depending on the method of hernia repair, the following were studied: the dynamics of Doppler studies of testicular blood flow, the level of sex hormones in the blood plasma and spermogram before and after surgery.\nResults. The average percentage of sperm motility in the first group was 41.51±6.62 (median = 40%), and in the second group – 41.76±1.16 (median = 41%). The mean sperm count and motility were significantly higher in the second group (P < 0.001). The duration of the operation was significantly shorter in the first group, operated on using the Lichtenstein method, than in the second group, operated on using the TAPP technique (45.8 ± 6.28 vs. 68.5 ± 16.31 min; p < 0.001). According to the results of testicular ultrasound, the average volume of the right testicle in the first group was 14.19±3.16 (median = 14 ml), and in the second group – 14.68±3.07 ml (median = 14.8 ml). =12.15 ml), and in the second group – 14.25±3.19 (median = 14.40 ml), which turned out to be significantly lower in the observation group (p = 0.029). There was a significant difference between the two groups for postoperative dysesthesia and chronic pain: 5% in the TAPP group versus 14% in the Lichtenstein group, and 1.5% in the TAPP group versus 6% in the open group for chronic pain.\n Conclusion. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative complications (p=0.56), short-term postoperative complications (p=0.75), wound infection (p=1.0), and urinary retention (p=0.68). However, treatment with the TAPP technique resulted in earlier hospital discharge, earlier return to normal activities, and optimal cosmetic results.","PeriodicalId":263577,"journal":{"name":"\"Medical &amp; pharmaceutical journal \"Pulse\"","volume":"608 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"Medical &amp; pharmaceutical journal \"Pulse\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26787/nydha-2686-6838-2024-26-1-34-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Male infertility is a rare, but at the same time underestimated complication of inguinal hernia repair. Aim. To compare the results of hernia repair in reproductive men using transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair (TAPP) and the Lichtenstein method. Material and methods. The study involved 56 male patients aged 18 to 45 years who were operated on for a primary inguinal hernia. All patients were divided into two groups. The first group included 29 patients operated on using the Lichtenstein method. The second group included 27 patients operated on using the TAPP technique. Depending on the method of hernia repair, the following were studied: the dynamics of Doppler studies of testicular blood flow, the level of sex hormones in the blood plasma and spermogram before and after surgery. Results. The average percentage of sperm motility in the first group was 41.51±6.62 (median = 40%), and in the second group – 41.76±1.16 (median = 41%). The mean sperm count and motility were significantly higher in the second group (P < 0.001). The duration of the operation was significantly shorter in the first group, operated on using the Lichtenstein method, than in the second group, operated on using the TAPP technique (45.8 ± 6.28 vs. 68.5 ± 16.31 min; p < 0.001). According to the results of testicular ultrasound, the average volume of the right testicle in the first group was 14.19±3.16 (median = 14 ml), and in the second group – 14.68±3.07 ml (median = 14.8 ml). =12.15 ml), and in the second group – 14.25±3.19 (median = 14.40 ml), which turned out to be significantly lower in the observation group (p = 0.029). There was a significant difference between the two groups for postoperative dysesthesia and chronic pain: 5% in the TAPP group versus 14% in the Lichtenstein group, and 1.5% in the TAPP group versus 6% in the open group for chronic pain. Conclusion. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative complications (p=0.56), short-term postoperative complications (p=0.75), wound infection (p=1.0), and urinary retention (p=0.68). However, treatment with the TAPP technique resulted in earlier hospital discharge, earlier return to normal activities, and optimal cosmetic results.
采用不同方法进行疝成形术的男性生育能力对比分析
男性不育是腹股沟疝修补术的一种罕见并发症,但同时也被低估了。比较经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)和利希滕斯坦法对生殖男性进行疝修补的效果。该研究涉及 56 名因原发性腹股沟疝而接受手术的 18 至 45 岁男性患者。所有患者分为两组。第一组包括 29 名使用 Lichtenstein 方法进行手术的患者。第二组包括 27 名使用 TAPP 技术进行手术的患者。根据疝气修补方法的不同,对以下内容进行了研究:手术前后睾丸血流的多普勒动态研究、血浆中性激素水平和精子图。第一组精子活力的平均百分比为 41.51±6.62(中位数 = 40%),第二组为 41.76±1.16(中位数 = 41%)。第二组的平均精子数量和活力明显更高(P < 0.001)。第一组采用利希滕斯坦法进行手术,手术时间明显短于第二组(45.8±6.28 分钟 vs. 68.5±16.31 分钟;P < 0.001)。根据睾丸超声检查结果,第一组右侧睾丸的平均体积为(14.19±3.16)毫升(中位数=14毫升),第二组为(14.68±3.07)毫升(中位数=14.8毫升),观察组为(14.25±3.19)毫升(中位数=14.40毫升)(P=0.029)。两组在术后疼痛和慢性疼痛方面存在显著差异:TAPP 组为 5%,而 Lichtenstein 组为 14%;TAPP 组为 1.5%,而开放组为 6%。结论。两组在术中并发症(P=0.56)、术后短期并发症(P=0.75)、伤口感染(P=1.0)和尿潴留(P=0.68)方面没有明显差异。不过,采用 TAPP 技术进行治疗可更早出院,更早地恢复正常活动,并获得最佳的美容效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信