Practical Training Experiences of HMD-based VR Foley Catheterization Education Content in Nursing Students

Mi Ja Yoo
{"title":"Practical Training Experiences of HMD-based VR Foley Catheterization Education Content in Nursing Students","authors":"Mi Ja Yoo","doi":"10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.2.541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study aims to figure out the meaning of the practical training experiences of HMD-based VR foley catheterization education content for university nursing students, and look for effective training strategies that utilize VR. \nMethods The study method involves a focus group interview of 12 university nursing students who have practiced VR foley catheterization education content. Data collection is done from 2023 May to June by three divided groups and the practical training of VR foley catheterization education content is carried out two times per week, a total of 6 times for three weeks, and interviews are conducted after the training. To organize the collected data, the sec-ond interview is conducted after a month. The major question was “what’s the upsides and downsides of the practical training of HMD-based VR foley catheterization education content?” and the average interview time was 50 minutes. The results are derived from the collected data by using content analysis methods. \nResults The research outcome shows that the collected three topics derived from eight topics are stated as ‘the positive experiences of HMD-based VR foley catheterization education content practical training’, ‘the negative experiences of HMD-based VR foley catheterization education content practical training’, and ‘the double-sided-ness of HMD-based VR foley catheterization education content practical training’. During the practical training of VR foley catheterization education content, participants feel heightened immersion and strengthened core skill capacities of foley catheterization and increased confidence, but their experiences left room for improvement due to physical side-effects such as headache and dizziness, and lack of sense of reality, and participants are also aware of the double-sidedness of it as they feel pride for VR core skill training which is not actively used yet, but also they feel it is hard to be used for providing comprehensive care through interactions. \nConclusions In conclusion, as the practical training of HMD-based VR foley catheterization content has both up-sides and downsides, its upsides need strengthening and its downsides need improving. Also, further continuous research is needed to diversely develop HMD-based VR core skill education content and to find effective practical training methods by expanding and applying it in each category.","PeriodicalId":414671,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","volume":"132 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.2.541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to figure out the meaning of the practical training experiences of HMD-based VR foley catheterization education content for university nursing students, and look for effective training strategies that utilize VR. Methods The study method involves a focus group interview of 12 university nursing students who have practiced VR foley catheterization education content. Data collection is done from 2023 May to June by three divided groups and the practical training of VR foley catheterization education content is carried out two times per week, a total of 6 times for three weeks, and interviews are conducted after the training. To organize the collected data, the sec-ond interview is conducted after a month. The major question was “what’s the upsides and downsides of the practical training of HMD-based VR foley catheterization education content?” and the average interview time was 50 minutes. The results are derived from the collected data by using content analysis methods. Results The research outcome shows that the collected three topics derived from eight topics are stated as ‘the positive experiences of HMD-based VR foley catheterization education content practical training’, ‘the negative experiences of HMD-based VR foley catheterization education content practical training’, and ‘the double-sided-ness of HMD-based VR foley catheterization education content practical training’. During the practical training of VR foley catheterization education content, participants feel heightened immersion and strengthened core skill capacities of foley catheterization and increased confidence, but their experiences left room for improvement due to physical side-effects such as headache and dizziness, and lack of sense of reality, and participants are also aware of the double-sidedness of it as they feel pride for VR core skill training which is not actively used yet, but also they feel it is hard to be used for providing comprehensive care through interactions. Conclusions In conclusion, as the practical training of HMD-based VR foley catheterization content has both up-sides and downsides, its upsides need strengthening and its downsides need improving. Also, further continuous research is needed to diversely develop HMD-based VR core skill education content and to find effective practical training methods by expanding and applying it in each category.
基于 HMD 的 VR 导入导管术教学内容在护理专业学生中的实训体验
目的 本研究旨在了解基于 HMD 的 VR 造影导管术教学内容对大学护理专业学生的实训意义,并寻找利用 VR 的有效培训策略。方法 采用焦点小组访谈法,对 12 名实践过 VR 导入导管教学内容的护理专业大学生进行访谈。数据收集时间为 2023 年 5 月至 6 月,分三组进行,每周进行 2 次 VR 福尔导管术教育内容的实训,三周共 6 次,实训结束后进行访谈。为整理收集到的数据,一个月后进行第二次访谈。主要问题是 "基于 HMD 的 VR 福尔导管术教育内容的实践培训有哪些优点和缺点?",平均访谈时间为 50 分钟。研究结果通过内容分析法从收集到的数据中得出。结果 研究结果显示,从 8 个话题中收集到的 3 个话题分别表述为 "基于 HMD 的 VR 造影导管术教育内容实训的积极体验"、"基于 HMD 的 VR 造影导管术教育内容实训的消极体验 "和 "基于 HMD 的 VR 造影导管术教育内容实训的两面性"。在 VR 导入导尿术教育内容的实训过程中,参与者感到身临其境,增强了导尿术的核心技能能力,提高了自信心,但由于头痛、头晕等身体副作用和缺乏真实感,他们的体验还有待改进,参与者也意识到了其双面性,他们为尚未积极使用的 VR 核心技能培训感到自豪,但也感到很难通过互动来提供全面护理。结论 总之,基于 HMD 的 VR 福尔导管术内容的实践培训既有优点也有缺点,优点需要加强,缺点需要改进。同时,还需要进一步不断研究,多样化地开发基于 HMD 的 VR 核心技能教学内容,并通过在各个类别中的拓展和应用,找到有效的实训方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信