Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Concrete Columns under Axial Load Based on European Design Norms

F. Grajçevci, Armend Mujaj, D. Kryeziu, Elfrida Shehu
{"title":"Experimental and Numerical Analysis of Concrete Columns under Axial Load Based on European Design Norms","authors":"F. Grajçevci, Armend Mujaj, D. Kryeziu, Elfrida Shehu","doi":"10.28991/cej-2024-010-02-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a comparison between numerical and experimental results for reinforced concrete columns subjected to axial compression. Depending on the columns support and their organization within the structure, columns primarily work under either concentric or eccentric compression, respectively, bending in situations where horizontal actions such as wind or/and earthquakes are present in the structure. Different countries have specific design codes, and in this study, the calculation of columns is based on the European design codes, specifically EN 1992-1-1. As a common practice in most cases during research, tests are conducted using computational models, and based on the obtained results through the application of similarity theory, an attempt is made to transition to the actual behavior of structural elements. Therefore, this paper applies a logic of \"almost real\" testing, where two columns with square cross-sections were produced and tested. The columns had a rectangular base with cross-section dimensions of 20/20 cm and a height (L) of 300 cm, with a concrete strength of fcm,cube=61.80 MPa. They were reinforced with longitudinal reinforcement (4Ø12 mm) and had a tensile strength of ftm=588.10 MPa. Additionally, stirrups of Ø8 mm were placed at every sw=25 cm. Experimental results show a closer alignment with software calculations using SEISMOSOFT with an accuracy of 96%, while results according to EN 1992-1-1, based on simplified methods, show 64% for the Nominal Stiffness Method and 59% for the Curvature Method. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-02-05 Full Text: PDF","PeriodicalId":10233,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2024-010-02-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comparison between numerical and experimental results for reinforced concrete columns subjected to axial compression. Depending on the columns support and their organization within the structure, columns primarily work under either concentric or eccentric compression, respectively, bending in situations where horizontal actions such as wind or/and earthquakes are present in the structure. Different countries have specific design codes, and in this study, the calculation of columns is based on the European design codes, specifically EN 1992-1-1. As a common practice in most cases during research, tests are conducted using computational models, and based on the obtained results through the application of similarity theory, an attempt is made to transition to the actual behavior of structural elements. Therefore, this paper applies a logic of "almost real" testing, where two columns with square cross-sections were produced and tested. The columns had a rectangular base with cross-section dimensions of 20/20 cm and a height (L) of 300 cm, with a concrete strength of fcm,cube=61.80 MPa. They were reinforced with longitudinal reinforcement (4Ø12 mm) and had a tensile strength of ftm=588.10 MPa. Additionally, stirrups of Ø8 mm were placed at every sw=25 cm. Experimental results show a closer alignment with software calculations using SEISMOSOFT with an accuracy of 96%, while results according to EN 1992-1-1, based on simplified methods, show 64% for the Nominal Stiffness Method and 59% for the Curvature Method. Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-02-05 Full Text: PDF
基于欧洲设计规范的轴向载荷下混凝土柱的实验和数值分析
本研究对承受轴向压缩的钢筋混凝土柱的数值结果和实验结果进行了比较。根据柱子的支撑及其在结构上的组织,柱子主要在同心或偏心压缩下工作,在结构上存在风或/和地震等水平作用的情况下,柱子分别在弯曲和同心压缩下工作。不同的国家有不同的设计规范,在本研究中,柱的计算是基于欧洲的设计规范,特别是 EN 1992-1-1。在大多数情况下,研究过程中的常见做法是使用计算模型进行测试,并根据应用相似性理论获得的结果,尝试过渡到结构元素的实际行为。因此,本文采用了 "近乎真实 "的测试逻辑,制作并测试了两根横截面为正方形的柱子。柱基为矩形,横截面尺寸为 20/20 厘米,高度(L)为 300 厘米,混凝土强度为 fcm,cube=61.80 兆帕。柱子采用纵向钢筋(4Ø12 毫米)加固,抗拉强度为 ftm=588.10 兆帕。此外,每隔 sw=25 厘米还放置了直径为 8 毫米的箍筋。实验结果表明,使用 SEISMOSOFT 软件计算的准确率为 96%,与之更为接近;而根据 EN 1992-1-1 标准,基于简化方法计算的结果表明,名义刚度法的准确率为 64%,曲率法的准确率为 59%。Doi: 10.28991/CEJ-2024-010-02-05 全文:PDF
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信