Structural Change and Labour Productivity Growth in India: A Sectoral Decomposition Analysis, 1980-2019

IF 0.3 Q4 ECONOMICS
{"title":"Structural Change and Labour Productivity Growth in India: A Sectoral Decomposition Analysis, 1980-2019","authors":"","doi":"10.35716/ijed-23303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aimed to trace the growth trajectory of labour productivity growth in India from 1980 to 2019. It evaluated economic growth and structural change. The study adopted decomposition techniques to comprehend how structural change influenced labour productivity. It enabled us to assess how different sectors were affected by reallocating labour inputs. A sub-period analysis was also done to analyse the effect of structural change across various sectors and study the contribution of sectors to aggregate labour productivity growth in India over different periods. Sectoral growth needs to be more consistent and balanced. The study concluded that India had benefited from the static structural change, that is, workers' movement to higher-productivity industries like manufacturing and construction. On the other hand, dynamic productivity gains, that is, the movements of workers to fast-growing industries that required very high productivity, were minimal or nonexistent. The services sector was predominantly responsible for the increase in value-added and output. It is challenging to sustain future developments without a strong manufacturing sector, mainly because of the slow rate of job creation in services, as it requires skills and expertise. Adequate policies facilitating the transfer of labourers from less productive to highly productive sectors are necessary to achieve growth-enhancing structural change.","PeriodicalId":43367,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Economics and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Economics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35716/ijed-23303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aimed to trace the growth trajectory of labour productivity growth in India from 1980 to 2019. It evaluated economic growth and structural change. The study adopted decomposition techniques to comprehend how structural change influenced labour productivity. It enabled us to assess how different sectors were affected by reallocating labour inputs. A sub-period analysis was also done to analyse the effect of structural change across various sectors and study the contribution of sectors to aggregate labour productivity growth in India over different periods. Sectoral growth needs to be more consistent and balanced. The study concluded that India had benefited from the static structural change, that is, workers' movement to higher-productivity industries like manufacturing and construction. On the other hand, dynamic productivity gains, that is, the movements of workers to fast-growing industries that required very high productivity, were minimal or nonexistent. The services sector was predominantly responsible for the increase in value-added and output. It is challenging to sustain future developments without a strong manufacturing sector, mainly because of the slow rate of job creation in services, as it requires skills and expertise. Adequate policies facilitating the transfer of labourers from less productive to highly productive sectors are necessary to achieve growth-enhancing structural change.
印度的结构变化与劳动生产率增长:1980-2019 年部门分解分析
本文旨在追溯 1980 年至 2019 年印度劳动生产率的增长轨迹。它对经济增长和结构变化进行了评估。研究采用分解技术来理解结构变化如何影响劳动生产率。这使我们能够评估重新分配劳动力投入对不同部门的影响。我们还进行了次时期分析,以分析结构变化对各部门的影响,并研究各部门在不同时期对印度总体劳动生产率增长的贡献。各部门的增长需要更加一致和平衡。研究得出结论,印度受益于静态结构变化,即工人向制造业和建筑业等生产率较高的行业流动。另一方面,动态生产率的提高,即工人向需要极高生产率的快速增长行业的流动,则微乎其微或根本不存在。服务业对附加值和产出的增长负有主要责任。如果没有一个强大的制造业部门,要维持未来的发展是具有挑战性的,这主要是因为服务业创造就业的速度缓慢,因为它需要技能和专业知识。要实现促进增长的结构变革,就必须制定适当的政策,促进劳动力从生产率较低的部门向生产率较高的部门转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信