The Approach Of Shihab Al-Din Al-Khafaji In His Intakes On Ibn Hisham Al-Ansari In His Book Jokes On Mughni Al-Labib/ منهج شهاب الدين الخفاجي في مآخذه على ابن هشام الأنصاري في كتابه نكت على مغني اللبيب

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Zakaria Al Tamimi
{"title":"The Approach Of Shihab Al-Din Al-Khafaji In His Intakes On Ibn Hisham Al-Ansari In His Book Jokes On Mughni Al-Labib/ منهج شهاب الدين الخفاجي في مآخذه على ابن هشام الأنصاري في كتابه نكت على مغني اللبيب","authors":"Zakaria Al Tamimi","doi":"10.18860/ijazarabi.v7i1.26147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research dealt with the approach of Shihab al-Din al-Khafaji in his intakes on Ibn Hisham al-Ansari in his book Comments on Mughni al-Labib He began with an introduction in which he mentioned the importance of the Mughni’s book, the importance of the joke book, and the reasons for choosing this topic, and that he had never studied other than the study of the investigator of the book of brief jokes. The research included an introduction, and a preface in which he talked about Ibn Hisham and his book Al-Mughni, and Shihab Al-Khafaji and his book jokes, and two sections, The first section was devoted to his diligence, and his grammatical doctrine, and made in two requirements: the first: for his efforts and diligence, and the other: for his grammatical doctrine, and the second section was devoted to: evaluating those intakes, And made in two requirements: the first: for the reasons of the drawbacks, and the other: for the grammatical assets that relied on them in the drawbacks, and concluded the research with a conclusion in which the most prominent results were included. The research took the descriptive approach and the analytical approach as an approach. The research reached results, including: that many of the books of Al-Khafaji, may God have mercy on him, are still in manuscript, and that he was free in his choices not affiliated with others, and in many matters of disagreement tended to the Basrians, and agreed with them, and that he did not explain everything that came in Al-Mughni’s text.","PeriodicalId":29848,"journal":{"name":"Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v7i1.26147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research dealt with the approach of Shihab al-Din al-Khafaji in his intakes on Ibn Hisham al-Ansari in his book Comments on Mughni al-Labib He began with an introduction in which he mentioned the importance of the Mughni’s book, the importance of the joke book, and the reasons for choosing this topic, and that he had never studied other than the study of the investigator of the book of brief jokes. The research included an introduction, and a preface in which he talked about Ibn Hisham and his book Al-Mughni, and Shihab Al-Khafaji and his book jokes, and two sections, The first section was devoted to his diligence, and his grammatical doctrine, and made in two requirements: the first: for his efforts and diligence, and the other: for his grammatical doctrine, and the second section was devoted to: evaluating those intakes, And made in two requirements: the first: for the reasons of the drawbacks, and the other: for the grammatical assets that relied on them in the drawbacks, and concluded the research with a conclusion in which the most prominent results were included. The research took the descriptive approach and the analytical approach as an approach. The research reached results, including: that many of the books of Al-Khafaji, may God have mercy on him, are still in manuscript, and that he was free in his choices not affiliated with others, and in many matters of disagreement tended to the Basrians, and agreed with them, and that he did not explain everything that came in Al-Mughni’s text.
The Approach Of Shihab Al-Din Al-Khafaji In His Intakes On Ibn Hisham Al-Ansari in His Book Jokes On Mughni Al-Labib/ The Approach Of Shihab Al-Din Al-Khafaji In His Intakes On Ibn Hisham Al-Ansari in His Book Jokes On Mughni Al-Labib
本研究探讨了 Shihab al-Din al-Khafaji 在《对 Mughni al-Labib 的评论》一书中对伊本-希沙姆-安萨里的研究方法。他首先介绍了 Mughni 一书的重要性、笑话书的重要性以及选择这一主题的原因,并指出除了对简短笑话书研究者的研究之外,他从未进行过其他研究。研究包括导言和前言,其中他谈到了伊本-希沙姆和他的《艾尔-穆格尼》一书,以及谢哈布-阿尔-哈法基和他的《笑话》一书,还有两个部分,第一部分专门介绍他的勤奋和他的语法学说,并提出了两个要求:第一个要求是:为了他的努力和勤奋,另一个要求是:为了他的语法学说和他的努力:第二部分专门用于:评价那些缺点,并提出了两个要求:第一个要求:缺点的原因,另一个要求:缺点中依赖的语法资产,并以结论结束研究,其中包括最突出的结果。研究采用了描述性方法和分析性方法。研究得出的结果包括:愿真主怜悯他,哈法基的许多著作仍保存在手稿中,他在选择上是自由的,不隶属于他人,在许多分歧问题上倾向于巴斯里亚人,并与他们达成一致,他并没有解释穆格尼文本中的所有内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信