The Approach Of Shihab Al-Din Al-Khafaji In His Intakes On Ibn Hisham Al-Ansari In His Book Jokes On Mughni Al-Labib/ منهج شهاب الدين الخفاجي في مآخذه على ابن هشام الأنصاري في كتابه نكت على مغني اللبيب
{"title":"The Approach Of Shihab Al-Din Al-Khafaji In His Intakes On Ibn Hisham Al-Ansari In His Book Jokes On Mughni Al-Labib/ منهج شهاب الدين الخفاجي في مآخذه على ابن هشام الأنصاري في كتابه نكت على مغني اللبيب","authors":"Zakaria Al Tamimi","doi":"10.18860/ijazarabi.v7i1.26147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research dealt with the approach of Shihab al-Din al-Khafaji in his intakes on Ibn Hisham al-Ansari in his book Comments on Mughni al-Labib He began with an introduction in which he mentioned the importance of the Mughni’s book, the importance of the joke book, and the reasons for choosing this topic, and that he had never studied other than the study of the investigator of the book of brief jokes. The research included an introduction, and a preface in which he talked about Ibn Hisham and his book Al-Mughni, and Shihab Al-Khafaji and his book jokes, and two sections, The first section was devoted to his diligence, and his grammatical doctrine, and made in two requirements: the first: for his efforts and diligence, and the other: for his grammatical doctrine, and the second section was devoted to: evaluating those intakes, And made in two requirements: the first: for the reasons of the drawbacks, and the other: for the grammatical assets that relied on them in the drawbacks, and concluded the research with a conclusion in which the most prominent results were included. The research took the descriptive approach and the analytical approach as an approach. The research reached results, including: that many of the books of Al-Khafaji, may God have mercy on him, are still in manuscript, and that he was free in his choices not affiliated with others, and in many matters of disagreement tended to the Basrians, and agreed with them, and that he did not explain everything that came in Al-Mughni’s text.","PeriodicalId":29848,"journal":{"name":"Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v7i1.26147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research dealt with the approach of Shihab al-Din al-Khafaji in his intakes on Ibn Hisham al-Ansari in his book Comments on Mughni al-Labib He began with an introduction in which he mentioned the importance of the Mughni’s book, the importance of the joke book, and the reasons for choosing this topic, and that he had never studied other than the study of the investigator of the book of brief jokes. The research included an introduction, and a preface in which he talked about Ibn Hisham and his book Al-Mughni, and Shihab Al-Khafaji and his book jokes, and two sections, The first section was devoted to his diligence, and his grammatical doctrine, and made in two requirements: the first: for his efforts and diligence, and the other: for his grammatical doctrine, and the second section was devoted to: evaluating those intakes, And made in two requirements: the first: for the reasons of the drawbacks, and the other: for the grammatical assets that relied on them in the drawbacks, and concluded the research with a conclusion in which the most prominent results were included. The research took the descriptive approach and the analytical approach as an approach. The research reached results, including: that many of the books of Al-Khafaji, may God have mercy on him, are still in manuscript, and that he was free in his choices not affiliated with others, and in many matters of disagreement tended to the Basrians, and agreed with them, and that he did not explain everything that came in Al-Mughni’s text.
The Approach Of Shihab Al-Din Al-Khafaji In His Intakes On Ibn Hisham Al-Ansari in His Book Jokes On Mughni Al-Labib/ The Approach Of Shihab Al-Din Al-Khafaji In His Intakes On Ibn Hisham Al-Ansari in His Book Jokes On Mughni Al-Labib