Implementation of think pair square type cooperative learning to improve collaboration skills in high schools

Mia Nurkanti, U. Kulsum, Dewi Halimah
{"title":"Implementation of think pair square type cooperative learning to improve collaboration skills in high schools","authors":"Mia Nurkanti, U. Kulsum, Dewi Halimah","doi":"10.31943/mangiferaedu.v8i2.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nThink Pair Square Style Cooperative Education encourages each student to become a proficient and independent learner. Given that this learning emphasizes 21st-century skills such as critical thinking, creativity, and teamwork. It was such as necessary to assess how effectively the application of this method enhances students' critical thinking abilities in the real world.  The objective of this project is to improve student cooperation in cell biology classes by implementing a cooperative learning model similar to the Think Pair Square. The Classroom action research model was developed by Kemmis and McTaggar, which served as the framework for the procedure employed in this study. The outlines of the four stages of classroom action research are technique—planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. This instructional approach is seen to be beneficial as it enables students to share their thoughts and helps them see alternative problem-solving approaches. Students can seek explanations from other students to explain how to solve the problem if they are struggling with that. From the Data results, there were rising scores in the form of scoring that serve as evidence for this. Students' collaboration skills scored an average of 1.6 (level 1, or basic level) in the pre-cycle, 2 (level 2, or medium level), and 3.56 (level 3, or trained level) in cycle 2. Think Pair Square's implementation at SMA in Bandung could improve collaboration both within and outside of the classroom, foster more active dialogue and idea exchange, and promote student contact. \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":33764,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Mangifera Edu","volume":"77 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Mangifera Edu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31943/mangiferaedu.v8i2.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Think Pair Square Style Cooperative Education encourages each student to become a proficient and independent learner. Given that this learning emphasizes 21st-century skills such as critical thinking, creativity, and teamwork. It was such as necessary to assess how effectively the application of this method enhances students' critical thinking abilities in the real world.  The objective of this project is to improve student cooperation in cell biology classes by implementing a cooperative learning model similar to the Think Pair Square. The Classroom action research model was developed by Kemmis and McTaggar, which served as the framework for the procedure employed in this study. The outlines of the four stages of classroom action research are technique—planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. This instructional approach is seen to be beneficial as it enables students to share their thoughts and helps them see alternative problem-solving approaches. Students can seek explanations from other students to explain how to solve the problem if they are struggling with that. From the Data results, there were rising scores in the form of scoring that serve as evidence for this. Students' collaboration skills scored an average of 1.6 (level 1, or basic level) in the pre-cycle, 2 (level 2, or medium level), and 3.56 (level 3, or trained level) in cycle 2. Think Pair Square's implementation at SMA in Bandung could improve collaboration both within and outside of the classroom, foster more active dialogue and idea exchange, and promote student contact.
在高中实施 "对对碰 "式合作学习,提高协作能力
Think Pair Square 式合作教育鼓励每个学生成为精通和独立的学习者。鉴于这种学习强调批判性思维、创造力和团队合作等 21 世纪技能。因此,有必要评估这种方法的应用在现实世界中如何有效地提高学生的批判性思维能力。 本项目的目标是通过实施类似于 "思考对对碰"(Think Pair Square)的合作学习模式,提高学生在细胞生物学课堂上的合作能力。课堂行动研究模式由 Kemmis 和 McTaggar 提出,是本研究采用的程序框架。课堂行动研究的四个阶段是技术--规划、实施、观察和反思。这种教学方法被认为是有益的,因为它能让学生分享自己的想法,帮助他们看到其他解决问题的方法。如果学生在解决问题时遇到困难,可以向其他学生寻求解释。从数据结果来看,评分形式的得分不断上升,证明了这一点。学生的协作能力在前周期平均得分 1.6(1 级,即基础水平),2 级(2 级,即中等水平),而在第二周期平均得分 3.56(3 级,即训练水平)。Think Pair Square 在万隆中学的实施可以改善课堂内外的协作,促进更积极的对话和思想交流,并促进学生之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信