VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF ON-SCREEN APPLICATION-BASED PROTRACTOR IN ASSESSMENT OF HIP JOINT IN TELEHEALTH MEDIUM

Jee Ho P. Sohn, Angelika R. Centeno, Karren Roze A. Gonzales, Maria Janiene E. Hamor, Mark Lawrence V. Rico, Christopher Allan F. Reballos, Kathlyne Jane F. Graycochea
{"title":"VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF ON-SCREEN APPLICATION-BASED PROTRACTOR IN ASSESSMENT OF HIP JOINT IN TELEHEALTH MEDIUM","authors":"Jee Ho P. Sohn, Angelika R. Centeno, Karren Roze A. Gonzales, Maria Janiene E. Hamor, Mark Lawrence V. Rico, Christopher Allan F. Reballos, Kathlyne Jane F. Graycochea","doi":"10.46409/002.rewh1081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The Google Chrome extension Protractor (GCE-P) by Ben Burlingham is a small software application where it can be used in a telerehabilitation setting by physical therapists and clinicians to measure active range of motion (AROM). This study\nis directed to determine the concurrent validity, intra- and interrater reliability of the GCE-P as compared to the universal goniometer (UG), in measuring the hip internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) in a seated position.\n\nMethods: This study is a descriptive validation study with crossover design of 54 recruited healthy participants. The hip AROM IR & ER were first measured with a UG to set a standard, and then was digitally measured via Google Meet using GCE-P, all were done in 3 trials. The following were used for data analyses: Pearson moment correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient and Blant-Altman analysis in sitting IR and ER, with alpha set at 0.05.\n\nResults: The GCE-P had a high agreement with the UG, with values of concurrent validity in hip IR (r=0.92) and ER (r=0.88). With a minimal mean difference of (3.44o) in hip IR and (0.30o) in hip ER, using Blant-Altman analysis. The GCE-P also had good intra-rater reliability, measured via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with values for hip IR of (ICC=0.92, 95%CI=0.87-0.95), and for hip ER of (ICC=0.94, 95%CI=0.90-0.96). Interrater reliability was also shown to be excellent with values of ICC=0.91 (95%CI=0.84-0.94) in hip IR, and ICC=0.88 (95%CI=0.81-0.93) in hip ER.\n\nDiscussion: The Google Chrome extension Protractor is accurate and reliable for measuring hip joint AROM in IR & ER. This is valid to be used in a telerehabilitation setting during consultations, and initial evaluations within the context of quarantine protocols.","PeriodicalId":156633,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"233 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.rewh1081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Google Chrome extension Protractor (GCE-P) by Ben Burlingham is a small software application where it can be used in a telerehabilitation setting by physical therapists and clinicians to measure active range of motion (AROM). This study is directed to determine the concurrent validity, intra- and interrater reliability of the GCE-P as compared to the universal goniometer (UG), in measuring the hip internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) in a seated position. Methods: This study is a descriptive validation study with crossover design of 54 recruited healthy participants. The hip AROM IR & ER were first measured with a UG to set a standard, and then was digitally measured via Google Meet using GCE-P, all were done in 3 trials. The following were used for data analyses: Pearson moment correlation coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient and Blant-Altman analysis in sitting IR and ER, with alpha set at 0.05. Results: The GCE-P had a high agreement with the UG, with values of concurrent validity in hip IR (r=0.92) and ER (r=0.88). With a minimal mean difference of (3.44o) in hip IR and (0.30o) in hip ER, using Blant-Altman analysis. The GCE-P also had good intra-rater reliability, measured via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with values for hip IR of (ICC=0.92, 95%CI=0.87-0.95), and for hip ER of (ICC=0.94, 95%CI=0.90-0.96). Interrater reliability was also shown to be excellent with values of ICC=0.91 (95%CI=0.84-0.94) in hip IR, and ICC=0.88 (95%CI=0.81-0.93) in hip ER. Discussion: The Google Chrome extension Protractor is accurate and reliable for measuring hip joint AROM in IR & ER. This is valid to be used in a telerehabilitation setting during consultations, and initial evaluations within the context of quarantine protocols.
基于屏幕应用的量角器在远程医疗媒介中评估髋关节的有效性和可靠性
简介由本-伯林厄姆(Ben Burlingham)开发的谷歌浏览器扩展软件 Protractor(GCE-P)是一款小型应用软件,物理治疗师和临床医生可在远程康复环境中使用该软件测量主动运动范围(AROM)。本研究旨在确定 GCE-P 与通用动态关节角度计(UG)相比,在测量坐姿下髋关节内旋(IR)和外旋(ER)时的并发有效性、内部和交互可靠性:本研究是一项描述性验证研究,对 54 名健康参与者进行了交叉设计。首先使用 UG 测量髋关节 AROM IR 和 ER 以设定标准,然后使用 GCE-P 通过 Google Meet 进行数字测量,所有测量均在 3 次试验中完成。数据分析采用了以下方法:对坐姿 IR 和 ER 进行皮尔逊矩相关系数、类内相关系数和 Blant-Altman 分析,α 设定为 0.05:GCE-P与UG的一致性很高,在髋部IR(r=0.92)和ER(r=0.88)方面具有并发有效性。使用 Blant-Altman 分析法,髋关节 IR 和 ER 的最小平均差异分别为(3.44o)和(0.30o)。通过类内相关系数(ICC)测量,GCE-P 还具有良好的评分者内部可靠性,髋关节 IR 值为(ICC=0.92,95%CI=0.87-0.95),髋关节 ER 值为(ICC=0.94,95%CI=0.90-0.96)。髋关节IR和髋关节ER的互测可靠性分别为ICC=0.91(95%CI=0.84-0.94)和ICC=0.88(95%CI=0.81-0.93),显示出良好的互测可靠性:谷歌 Chrome 浏览器扩展软件 Protractor 可准确可靠地测量髋关节 IR 和 ER 的 AROM。讨论:谷歌 Chrome 浏览器扩展软件 Protractor 可准确可靠地测量 IR 和 ER 的髋关节 AROM,可用于远程康复咨询和隔离协议背景下的初步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信