VIRTUAL REALITY IN THE PHILIPPINES: FACILITATORS AND PERCEIVED BARRIERS OF VIRTUAL REALITY AS A THERAPEUTIC TOOL IN THE CLINICAL SETTING

Brent Adams S. Eliasos, Betina Alexandra N. Decada, John Paul R. De Guia, Julian D. Rafanan, Virginie Mae I. Inuman, Aira Jannelle I. Revuelto, M. A. Zamora
{"title":"VIRTUAL REALITY IN THE PHILIPPINES: FACILITATORS AND PERCEIVED BARRIERS OF VIRTUAL REALITY AS A THERAPEUTIC TOOL IN THE CLINICAL SETTING","authors":"Brent Adams S. Eliasos, Betina Alexandra N. Decada, John Paul R. De Guia, Julian D. Rafanan, Virginie Mae I. Inuman, Aira Jannelle I. Revuelto, M. A. Zamora","doi":"10.46409/002.ayee8847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Virtual Reality (VR) begins to emerge in the Physical Therapy Practice here in the Philippines. However, it goes through a process of acceptance before it can be used as a part of the mainstream treatment modality in the current PT practice. Study aims to explore the perceived barriers and limitations of a handheld virtual reality as a therapeutic tool. \n\nMethods: The study employed a qualitative phenomenological study a semi-structured interview conducted via Zoom platform. A snowball sampling was utilized to gather informants’ opinions. Coding was conducted through a meticulous review of respondents by the researchers. The codes were analyzed using Collaizi Method through QDA Miner Lite. Theoretical thematic analysis was utilized to support the themes from the answers of the informants. \n\nResults: Twelve informants were initially invited to reach the number of subjects required. However, only ten agreed and consented to participate. Data saturation was met during the sixth interview. The following themes emerged: Barriers (Expensiveness, Atypical Practice), Limitations (Short-Term Functional Effect, Level of Comprehension Required to Understand VR), and Advantages (Entertaining and Usefulness to Neurological and Musculoskeletal cases). \n\nDiscussion: This paper gathered information from ten registered physical therapists (PTRP) in the country who experienced the use of handheld VR (Nintendo Wii, Xbox, etc.) and their perception of their exposure to the emerging therapeutic tool. Nine out of ten subjects concluded that the cost and expense of the console and the setup of the whole handheld VR room is the main barrier as to why it is still not being used in majority of the rehabilitative clinics nowadays. As an atypical practice, it also plays a role in the perceived barriers of the informants. Most of the subjects believed that current practice in the country needs to work with technology more – in order to keep up with the ever-growing technology in healthcare.","PeriodicalId":156633,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"64 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.ayee8847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Virtual Reality (VR) begins to emerge in the Physical Therapy Practice here in the Philippines. However, it goes through a process of acceptance before it can be used as a part of the mainstream treatment modality in the current PT practice. Study aims to explore the perceived barriers and limitations of a handheld virtual reality as a therapeutic tool. Methods: The study employed a qualitative phenomenological study a semi-structured interview conducted via Zoom platform. A snowball sampling was utilized to gather informants’ opinions. Coding was conducted through a meticulous review of respondents by the researchers. The codes were analyzed using Collaizi Method through QDA Miner Lite. Theoretical thematic analysis was utilized to support the themes from the answers of the informants. Results: Twelve informants were initially invited to reach the number of subjects required. However, only ten agreed and consented to participate. Data saturation was met during the sixth interview. The following themes emerged: Barriers (Expensiveness, Atypical Practice), Limitations (Short-Term Functional Effect, Level of Comprehension Required to Understand VR), and Advantages (Entertaining and Usefulness to Neurological and Musculoskeletal cases). Discussion: This paper gathered information from ten registered physical therapists (PTRP) in the country who experienced the use of handheld VR (Nintendo Wii, Xbox, etc.) and their perception of their exposure to the emerging therapeutic tool. Nine out of ten subjects concluded that the cost and expense of the console and the setup of the whole handheld VR room is the main barrier as to why it is still not being used in majority of the rehabilitative clinics nowadays. As an atypical practice, it also plays a role in the perceived barriers of the informants. Most of the subjects believed that current practice in the country needs to work with technology more – in order to keep up with the ever-growing technology in healthcare.
菲律宾的虚拟现实:将虚拟现实技术作为临床治疗工具的促进因素和面临的障碍
导言:虚拟现实(VR)开始在菲律宾的物理治疗实践中出现。然而,在将其作为当前理疗实践中主流治疗方式的一部分之前,还需要一个接受过程。本研究旨在探讨将手持式虚拟现实技术作为治疗工具的障碍和限制。研究方法本研究采用定性现象学研究,通过 Zoom 平台进行半结构化访谈。采用 "滚雪球 "抽样法收集受访者的意见。研究人员通过对受访者的细致审查进行编码。通过 QDA Miner Lite 使用柯莱兹方法对编码进行了分析。利用理论主题分析来支持受访者答案中的主题。结果:最初邀请了 12 位信息提供者,以达到所需的调查对象人数。然而,只有十位知情者同意参与。第六次访谈达到了数据饱和。出现了以下主题:障碍(昂贵、非典型实践)、限制(短期功能效果、理解 VR 所需的理解水平)和优势(娱乐性和对神经和肌肉骨骼病例的实用性)。讨论:本文收集了国内十位注册物理治疗师(PTRP)使用掌上 VR(任天堂 Wii、Xbox 等)的经验,以及他们对接触这一新兴治疗工具的看法。十位受试者中有九位认为,控制台的成本和费用以及整个手持式 VR 房间的设置是目前大多数康复诊所仍未使用 VR 的主要障碍。作为一种非典型做法,它也是信息提供者认为存在障碍的原因之一。大多数受试者认为,该国目前的做法需要更多地与技术合作,以跟上医疗保健技术不断发展的步伐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信