Plagiarism in Academic Writing in Higher Education Institutions: A Bibliometric Analysis

Hadijah Ahmad, Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi
{"title":"Plagiarism in Academic Writing in Higher Education Institutions: A Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"Hadijah Ahmad, Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi","doi":"10.46328/ijonses.623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher education institutions (HEI) are increasingly challenged by plagiarism, which threatens their academic standards and integrity. This is due to the fact that students have access to an overwhelming amount of information online, making it easier for them to copy and paste without giving proper credit or attribution. Additionally, the prevalence of technology has made it easier to copy and paste without detection. The study aimed to analyze the trends in plagiarism in academic writing by using bibliometric analysis, which is a technique that can measure and analyze the use of published documents. This analysis was used to identify any potential changes in the prevalence of plagiarism in academic writing over time and to identify potential factors that could be influencing it. The data is extracted from Scopus database with Boolean and proximity search strategy and found 579 related journal articles. There are tabulations of results ranging from descriptive analysis, citation analysis, co-citation analysis, and co-word analysis. The descriptive findings revealed that 'academic integrity', despite not being included in the search string, was the most commonly occurring word with 284 indicating a significant relationship between plagiarism in academic writing in HEIs. In addition, citation analysis for the top ten documents was presented. The findings of co-citation analysis highlight factors, new trends of academic integrity, and mitigation plans against plagiarism, while co-word analysis are thematically presented in three prominent clusters which is academic misconduct study, ethics and academic integrity. In most prominent articles cited by many authors, contract cheating is the new trend of plagiarism. As a result, it sheds light on the fact that academic integrity issues go beyond a new phenomenon that needs to be taken seriously. This study has both theoretical and practical implications for minimizing future plagiarism risks as well as identifying and recommending potential solutions to the problem.","PeriodicalId":476455,"journal":{"name":"International journal on social and education sciences","volume":"200 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal on social and education sciences","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Higher education institutions (HEI) are increasingly challenged by plagiarism, which threatens their academic standards and integrity. This is due to the fact that students have access to an overwhelming amount of information online, making it easier for them to copy and paste without giving proper credit or attribution. Additionally, the prevalence of technology has made it easier to copy and paste without detection. The study aimed to analyze the trends in plagiarism in academic writing by using bibliometric analysis, which is a technique that can measure and analyze the use of published documents. This analysis was used to identify any potential changes in the prevalence of plagiarism in academic writing over time and to identify potential factors that could be influencing it. The data is extracted from Scopus database with Boolean and proximity search strategy and found 579 related journal articles. There are tabulations of results ranging from descriptive analysis, citation analysis, co-citation analysis, and co-word analysis. The descriptive findings revealed that 'academic integrity', despite not being included in the search string, was the most commonly occurring word with 284 indicating a significant relationship between plagiarism in academic writing in HEIs. In addition, citation analysis for the top ten documents was presented. The findings of co-citation analysis highlight factors, new trends of academic integrity, and mitigation plans against plagiarism, while co-word analysis are thematically presented in three prominent clusters which is academic misconduct study, ethics and academic integrity. In most prominent articles cited by many authors, contract cheating is the new trend of plagiarism. As a result, it sheds light on the fact that academic integrity issues go beyond a new phenomenon that needs to be taken seriously. This study has both theoretical and practical implications for minimizing future plagiarism risks as well as identifying and recommending potential solutions to the problem.
高等院校学术著作中的剽窃行为:文献计量分析
高等教育机构 (HEI) 越来越多地受到剽窃行为的挑战,这威胁到其学术标准和诚信。这是因为学生可以在网上获取大量信息,使他们更容易复制和粘贴而不注明出处。此外,技术的普及使复制和粘贴变得更加容易而不被发现。这项研究旨在通过文献计量分析来分析学术写作中的抄袭趋势,文献计量分析是一种可以测量和分析已发表文献使用情况的技术。该分析用于确定学术写作中抄袭现象的普遍程度随时间推移可能发生的任何变化,并找出可能影响抄袭现象的潜在因素。数据提取自 Scopus 数据库,采用布尔和邻近搜索策略,找到了 579 篇相关期刊论文。研究结果列表包括描述性分析、引文分析、共引分析和共词分析。描述性分析结果显示,尽管 "学术诚信 "没有包含在搜索字符串中,但它是最常出现的词,有 284 个,这表明高等院校学术写作中的剽窃行为与 "学术诚信 "有重要关系。此外,还对排名前十的文献进行了引文分析。共引分析的结果突出了学术诚信的因素、新趋势以及针对剽窃的缓解方案,而共用词分析则按学术不端行为研究、伦理和学术诚信这三个突出的集群进行了主题性呈现。在许多作者引用的大多数重要文章中,合同作弊是抄袭的新趋势。因此,它揭示了一个事实,即学术诚信问题不仅仅是一个需要认真对待的新现象。这项研究对于最大限度地降低未来的抄袭风险,以及确定和提出潜在的解决方法,都具有理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信