Linguo-cognitive mechanisms of metaphorization in COVID-19 discourse (based on Russian-language media)

Alexandra Sokratovna Dadueva, S. A. Khakhalova
{"title":"Linguo-cognitive mechanisms of metaphorization in COVID-19 discourse (based on Russian-language media)","authors":"Alexandra Sokratovna Dadueva, S. A. Khakhalova","doi":"10.30853/phil20240058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to prove the productivity of a military metaphor reflecting the perception of the situation of the fight against coronavirus as akin to a military battle. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that the systematization and interpretation of linguistic and conceptual metaphors in the structure and content of the COVID-19 mental frame have been carried out. As a result of the study, it was revealed that nominal metaphors provide access to the content of the frame, while verbal metaphors provide access to the frame scenario. The functionality of the frame is supported by conceptual metaphors. The most productive linguo-cognitive mechanisms of metaphorization that allow identifying the conceptual metaphors THE PANDEMIC IS WAR, THE CORONAVIRUS IS THE ENEMY are as follows: the use of military vocabulary with metaphorical meaning; substitution of the PANDEMIC, WAR, ENEMY, DISEASE concepts; the scenario “coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 poses a threat to human life” in the COVID-19 mental frame. In this mental frame, concepts are being replaced as the basis for manipulating linguistic consciousness, which suggests that the social mission for the media is to create semantic negativity of the PANDEMIC concept in the human cognitive sphere.","PeriodicalId":415627,"journal":{"name":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study is to prove the productivity of a military metaphor reflecting the perception of the situation of the fight against coronavirus as akin to a military battle. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that the systematization and interpretation of linguistic and conceptual metaphors in the structure and content of the COVID-19 mental frame have been carried out. As a result of the study, it was revealed that nominal metaphors provide access to the content of the frame, while verbal metaphors provide access to the frame scenario. The functionality of the frame is supported by conceptual metaphors. The most productive linguo-cognitive mechanisms of metaphorization that allow identifying the conceptual metaphors THE PANDEMIC IS WAR, THE CORONAVIRUS IS THE ENEMY are as follows: the use of military vocabulary with metaphorical meaning; substitution of the PANDEMIC, WAR, ENEMY, DISEASE concepts; the scenario “coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 poses a threat to human life” in the COVID-19 mental frame. In this mental frame, concepts are being replaced as the basis for manipulating linguistic consciousness, which suggests that the social mission for the media is to create semantic negativity of the PANDEMIC concept in the human cognitive sphere.
COVID-19 话语中隐喻化的语言认知机制(基于俄语媒体)
这项研究的目的是证明军事隐喻的有效性,它反映了人们对抗击冠状病毒的形势的看法,就像一场军事战斗。这项工作的科学新颖性在于对 COVID-19 心理框架结构和内容中的语言隐喻和概念隐喻进行了系统化和解释。研究结果表明,名词隐喻提供了通向框架内容的途径,而动词隐喻提供了通向框架情景的途径。框架的功能得到了概念隐喻的支持。隐喻化最有效的语言认知机制是:使用具有隐喻意义的军事词汇;"隐喻"、"战争"、"敌人"、"疾病 "概念的替换;COVID-19 心理框架中 "冠状病毒 SARS-CoV-2 对人类生命构成威胁 "的情景。在这一心理框架中,概念被替换为操纵语言意识的基础,这表明媒体的社会使命是在人类认知领域制造 "PANDEMIC "概念的语义否定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信