{"title":"« Petit à petit, progressivement, pour toujours »: Images du temps dans les proses de Urmuz","authors":"Adrian Tudurachi","doi":"10.33993/tr.2023.4.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A singular Romanian writer, often considered a precursor of the avant-garde, Urmuz (1883–\n1923) left a complex representation of time in his work. Alongside chronological temporality, we\nfind the elements of a more complex temporal imaginary, which is essentially critical of notions\nof progress. The paper proposes a close reading of the prose endings, to underline the particular\naspects of the representation of time: the integration of destruction, its indefinite continuity, its\npositioning in relation to the future. Drawing on Giorgio Agamben’s reading of the Epistle to the\nRomans, we highlight the messianic character of the time represented in Urmuz’s prose. Through\nan analysis of the linguistic dimensions of temporal expressions, as well as an analysis of the relationship between time and the imaginary of filiation, we attempt to discuss the possibility of a\ncritique of modernity and what we might call, with a notion borrowed from François Hartog, an\nalternative regime of historicity.","PeriodicalId":23235,"journal":{"name":"Transylvanian Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transylvanian Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33993/tr.2023.4.06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A singular Romanian writer, often considered a precursor of the avant-garde, Urmuz (1883–
1923) left a complex representation of time in his work. Alongside chronological temporality, we
find the elements of a more complex temporal imaginary, which is essentially critical of notions
of progress. The paper proposes a close reading of the prose endings, to underline the particular
aspects of the representation of time: the integration of destruction, its indefinite continuity, its
positioning in relation to the future. Drawing on Giorgio Agamben’s reading of the Epistle to the
Romans, we highlight the messianic character of the time represented in Urmuz’s prose. Through
an analysis of the linguistic dimensions of temporal expressions, as well as an analysis of the relationship between time and the imaginary of filiation, we attempt to discuss the possibility of a
critique of modernity and what we might call, with a notion borrowed from François Hartog, an
alternative regime of historicity.
期刊介绍:
Scientific periodical of the Center for Transylvanian Studies, the Transylvanian Review quarterly is published exclusively in widely spoken languages (English, French, German, Italian) and regularly sent to nearly 200 Romanian and foreign libraries. Transylvanian Review is a peer reviewed journal, with evaluators selected from reputable specialists in their field. Transylvanian Review features studies, articles, debates and book reviews pertaining to various cultural fields, with direct reference to Transylvania, seen as a multicultural space of ethnic, linguistic, religious contacts.