The moderating role of sector risk in the relationship between ESG and financial performance: Evidence from top companies in Malaysia

Q4 Multidisciplinary
Nur Syuhada Jasni, Amirah Zulkifli
{"title":"The moderating role of sector risk in the relationship between ESG and financial performance: Evidence from top companies in Malaysia","authors":"Nur Syuhada Jasni, Amirah Zulkifli","doi":"10.55214/25768484.v8i2.672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper delves into the role of contextual factors, specifically examining how sector risks interact with the relationship between ESG and financial returns in Malaysian companies. ESG practice integration into business strategies has gained momentum, but understanding the link between ESG and financial performance remains complex. Utilising ESG data from 2019 to 2021 and corresponding financial data lagged by one year, this study analysed the impact of overall and pillar-specific ESG scores on financial returns across sectors categorised as high, medium, and low risk. The findings highlight the critical role of sector risk as a moderating variable. The high-risk sector has strong governance initiatives that bolster financial performance, while social initiatives showed mixed effects. Governance efforts become strategic advantages in high-risk sectors by mitigating risks and attracting investors. Conversely, the medium-risk sector witnessed a positive association between social initiatives and returns, but other ESG factors exhibited varied impacts. Notably, the low-risk sector exhibited minimal links between ESG and financial performance, with certain factors displaying negative tendencies. This suggests that the financial impact of ESG practices is not uniform and instead varies dramatically depending on the risk profile of the sector. While the insights generated by this research are valuable, it is crucial to acknowledge certain limitations, such as a modest sample size and potential influences from the COVID-19 pandemic. By elucidating sector-specific variations, this study empowers companies to strategically align their ESG initiatives with their risk profiles and achieve optimal financial outcomes.","PeriodicalId":36430,"journal":{"name":"Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology","volume":"77 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i2.672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper delves into the role of contextual factors, specifically examining how sector risks interact with the relationship between ESG and financial returns in Malaysian companies. ESG practice integration into business strategies has gained momentum, but understanding the link between ESG and financial performance remains complex. Utilising ESG data from 2019 to 2021 and corresponding financial data lagged by one year, this study analysed the impact of overall and pillar-specific ESG scores on financial returns across sectors categorised as high, medium, and low risk. The findings highlight the critical role of sector risk as a moderating variable. The high-risk sector has strong governance initiatives that bolster financial performance, while social initiatives showed mixed effects. Governance efforts become strategic advantages in high-risk sectors by mitigating risks and attracting investors. Conversely, the medium-risk sector witnessed a positive association between social initiatives and returns, but other ESG factors exhibited varied impacts. Notably, the low-risk sector exhibited minimal links between ESG and financial performance, with certain factors displaying negative tendencies. This suggests that the financial impact of ESG practices is not uniform and instead varies dramatically depending on the risk profile of the sector. While the insights generated by this research are valuable, it is crucial to acknowledge certain limitations, such as a modest sample size and potential influences from the COVID-19 pandemic. By elucidating sector-specific variations, this study empowers companies to strategically align their ESG initiatives with their risk profiles and achieve optimal financial outcomes.
行业风险在环境、社会和公司治理与财务业绩关系中的调节作用:来自马来西亚顶级公司的证据
本文深入探讨了环境因素的作用,特别是研究了行业风险如何与马来西亚公司的环境、社会和公司治理(ESG)和财务回报之间的关系相互影响。将环境、社会和公司治理实践纳入企业战略的势头日渐强劲,但了解环境、社会和公司治理与财务业绩之间的联系仍然十分复杂。本研究利用 2019 年至 2021 年的环境、社会和公司治理数据以及滞后一年的相应财务数据,分析了高风险、中等风险和低风险行业的总体和特定支柱环境、社会和公司治理得分对财务回报的影响。研究结果凸显了行业风险作为调节变量的关键作用。高风险行业拥有强有力的治理措施,可以提高财务业绩,而社会措施的效果则好坏参半。通过降低风险和吸引投资者,治理工作成为高风险部门的战略优势。相反,中风险行业的社会倡议与回报之间呈正相关,但其他环境、社会和公司治理因素的影响各不相同。值得注意的是,低风险行业的环境、社会和公司治理与财务业绩之间的联系微乎其微,某些因素表现出负面趋势。这表明,环境、社会和公司治理实践对财务的影响并不一致,而是因行业风险状况的不同而存在巨大差异。虽然这项研究得出的见解很有价值,但也必须承认某些局限性,如样本数量有限以及 COVID-19 大流行的潜在影响。本研究通过阐明各行业的具体差异,帮助企业根据其风险状况战略性地调整其环境、社会和治理措施,并实现最佳的财务结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信