Environmental viability and economic sustainability of tillage for wheat: Evidence from Croatia

M. Stošić, Popović Brigita, Ranogajec Ljubica
{"title":"Environmental viability and economic sustainability of tillage for wheat: Evidence from Croatia","authors":"M. Stošić, Popović Brigita, Ranogajec Ljubica","doi":"10.17352/gje.000092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A multidisciplinary field experiment was performed during three seasons for winter wheat in Croatia. The intention of this study was to examine and diagnose the effect of Tillage Systems (TS) on soil chemical properties (soil acidity, phosphorus, potassium, and organic matter content) as well as the outcome of economic indicators such as Gross Margin (GM), Rate of Profitability (ROP), cost-effectiveness (E) and productivity (P). TS were CT - plowing up to 30 cm depth; DT - disking up to 8-12 cm depth; LT - loosening up to 35 cm depth; NT - no-tillage. The experimental design was a randomised block design in four repetitions, where the basic TS plot was 540 m2. Soil sampling for 0-30 cm soil layer was done prior to setting up the experiment and after three seasons, a total of 320 soil samples and chemical analyses were performed according to standard pedological procedures. Economic indicators are calculated using economic equations and standards and statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.3 and Microsoft Excel 2016. Generated results point that on systems with shallower tillage or no- tillage expressed accumulation of phosphorus and potassium appeared with distinct vertical stratification. At the same time, these TS ensured soil organic matter and soil fertility preservation. From the aspect of economic calculations, LT assigned the prime economic results. The ROP was in order CT (32.67%) < DT (37.39%) < LT (40.31%) < NT (42.29%). The same order was established for E, namely, CT (1.33) < DT (1.37%) < LT (1.40%) < NT (1.42%). NT established the best P because of the lowest costs of production, but due to significantly lower yield, NT has limited adoption in practice. The conservable and viable agricultural production by intermediation of reduced soil tillage systems has its capabilities and potency, firstly ecological, through providing soil degradation, and then economical by potentiating economic sustainability and financial efficiency of agricultural production.","PeriodicalId":483336,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of ecology","volume":"459 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of ecology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/gje.000092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A multidisciplinary field experiment was performed during three seasons for winter wheat in Croatia. The intention of this study was to examine and diagnose the effect of Tillage Systems (TS) on soil chemical properties (soil acidity, phosphorus, potassium, and organic matter content) as well as the outcome of economic indicators such as Gross Margin (GM), Rate of Profitability (ROP), cost-effectiveness (E) and productivity (P). TS were CT - plowing up to 30 cm depth; DT - disking up to 8-12 cm depth; LT - loosening up to 35 cm depth; NT - no-tillage. The experimental design was a randomised block design in four repetitions, where the basic TS plot was 540 m2. Soil sampling for 0-30 cm soil layer was done prior to setting up the experiment and after three seasons, a total of 320 soil samples and chemical analyses were performed according to standard pedological procedures. Economic indicators are calculated using economic equations and standards and statistical analysis was performed with SAS 9.3 and Microsoft Excel 2016. Generated results point that on systems with shallower tillage or no- tillage expressed accumulation of phosphorus and potassium appeared with distinct vertical stratification. At the same time, these TS ensured soil organic matter and soil fertility preservation. From the aspect of economic calculations, LT assigned the prime economic results. The ROP was in order CT (32.67%) < DT (37.39%) < LT (40.31%) < NT (42.29%). The same order was established for E, namely, CT (1.33) < DT (1.37%) < LT (1.40%) < NT (1.42%). NT established the best P because of the lowest costs of production, but due to significantly lower yield, NT has limited adoption in practice. The conservable and viable agricultural production by intermediation of reduced soil tillage systems has its capabilities and potency, firstly ecological, through providing soil degradation, and then economical by potentiating economic sustainability and financial efficiency of agricultural production.
小麦耕作的环境可行性和经济可持续性:克罗地亚的证据
在克罗地亚冬小麦种植的三个季节里,进行了一项多学科田间试验。这项研究的目的是检查和诊断耕作制度(TS)对土壤化学性质(土壤酸度、磷、钾和有机质含量)的影响,以及对毛利率(GM)、收益率(ROP)、成本效益(E)和生产力(P)等经济指标的影响。试验方法为:CT - 耕作深度达 30 厘米;DT - 盘耕深度达 8-12 厘米;LT - 松土深度达 35 厘米;NT - 免耕。实验设计为随机区组设计,共四次重复,基本 TS 小区面积为 540 平方米。实验前对 0-30 厘米土层进行了土壤取样,三季后共采集了 320 个土壤样本,并按照标准土壤学程序进行了化学分析。经济指标使用经济方程和标准进行计算,统计分析使用 SAS 9.3 和 Microsoft Excel 2016 进行。生成的结果表明,在浅耕或免耕系统中,磷和钾的积累表现为明显的垂直分层。同时,这些 TS 确保了土壤有机质和土壤肥力的保持。从经济效益的角度来看,LT 的经济效益最好。ROP 依次为 CT(32.67%)< DT(37.39%)< LT(40.31%)< NT(42.29%)。E 的顺序也是如此,即 CT(1.33%)< DT(1.37%)< LT(1.40%)< NT(1.42%)。由于生产成本最低,NT 的 P 值最高,但由于产量明显较低,NT 在实际应用中受到限制。以减少土壤耕作制度为中介的可保护和可行的农业生产有其能力和潜力,首先是通过提供土壤退化来实现生态,其次是通过提高农业生产的经济可持续性和财务效率来实现经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信