Speech-Language Pathologists' Use of Side-Lying Position in Infant Modified Barium Swallow Studies: A Qualitative Investigation

J. B. Smith, Cynthia O'Donoghue, Rebecca Jones
{"title":"Speech-Language Pathologists' Use of Side-Lying Position in Infant Modified Barium Swallow Studies: A Qualitative Investigation","authors":"J. B. Smith, Cynthia O'Donoghue, Rebecca Jones","doi":"10.1044/2024_persp-23-00263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This qualitative study explored the practices of hospital-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) conducting modified barium swallow studies (MBS) for infants at risk for dysphagia. Specifically, this research aimed to determine whether or not SLPs use side-lying position during MBS, to examine possible differences in the use of positioning, and to better understand SLPs' perceptions and experiences in this practice. Using a constructivist view, research questions guiding this inquiry were as follows: What is the current practice of hospital-based pediatric SLPs in regard to the use of side-lying position during infant MBS? What is the experience of the hospital-based SLP in their use of side-lying position during MBS? How do SLPs report perceived barriers or benefits to using side-lying position during MBS?\n \n \n \n Employing a purposive-convenience sampling technique, data were collected using semistructured interviews of SLPs serving at-risk infants with dysphagia. All participants were practicing in Level-III or -IV neonatal intensive care units. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, loaded into NVivo, and coded using initial and consensus coding. Themes achieved saturation following six interviews.\n \n \n \n Three themes emerged from the analysis: (a) variations in practice patterns, (b) factors influencing clinical practice, and (c) items that SLPs identified as needs to facilitate change in their clinical practice.\n \n \n \n Although SLPs acknowledged the importance of MBS replicating an infant's typical feeding, some SLPs who consistently use side-lying position during feeding do not assess feeding in side-lying position during MBS. This inconsistency in practice results from SLPs' perceived barriers, including lack of experience, concern over interdisciplinary conflict, need for MBS protocols, and lack of research on the potential impacts of side-lying positioning on swallowing. Participants reported the need for research to determine whether side-lying position alters, possibly improves, swallow functions and safety (e.g., airway protection) for at-risk infants.\n","PeriodicalId":74424,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","volume":"758 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_persp-23-00263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study explored the practices of hospital-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs) conducting modified barium swallow studies (MBS) for infants at risk for dysphagia. Specifically, this research aimed to determine whether or not SLPs use side-lying position during MBS, to examine possible differences in the use of positioning, and to better understand SLPs' perceptions and experiences in this practice. Using a constructivist view, research questions guiding this inquiry were as follows: What is the current practice of hospital-based pediatric SLPs in regard to the use of side-lying position during infant MBS? What is the experience of the hospital-based SLP in their use of side-lying position during MBS? How do SLPs report perceived barriers or benefits to using side-lying position during MBS? Employing a purposive-convenience sampling technique, data were collected using semistructured interviews of SLPs serving at-risk infants with dysphagia. All participants were practicing in Level-III or -IV neonatal intensive care units. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, loaded into NVivo, and coded using initial and consensus coding. Themes achieved saturation following six interviews. Three themes emerged from the analysis: (a) variations in practice patterns, (b) factors influencing clinical practice, and (c) items that SLPs identified as needs to facilitate change in their clinical practice. Although SLPs acknowledged the importance of MBS replicating an infant's typical feeding, some SLPs who consistently use side-lying position during feeding do not assess feeding in side-lying position during MBS. This inconsistency in practice results from SLPs' perceived barriers, including lack of experience, concern over interdisciplinary conflict, need for MBS protocols, and lack of research on the potential impacts of side-lying positioning on swallowing. Participants reported the need for research to determine whether side-lying position alters, possibly improves, swallow functions and safety (e.g., airway protection) for at-risk infants.
语言病理学家在婴儿改良吞钡研究中使用侧卧位的情况:定性调查
本定性研究探讨了医院语言病理学家(SLPs)在对有吞咽困难风险的婴儿进行改良吞钡研究(MBS)时的做法。具体而言,本研究旨在确定言语病理学家在进行 MBS 时是否使用侧卧位,检查在使用定位时可能存在的差异,并更好地了解言语病理学家在这一实践中的看法和经验。采用建构主义观点,指导本次调查的研究问题如下:目前医院儿科 SLPs 在婴儿 MBS 期间使用侧卧位的做法是什么?医院儿科SLP在使用侧卧位进行MBS时有哪些经验?SLPs如何报告在MBS期间使用侧卧位的障碍或益处? 采用有目的性的便利抽样技术,通过半结构式访谈收集了为吞咽困难的高危婴儿提供服务的 SLPs 的数据。所有参与者均在三级或四级新生儿重症监护病房工作。对访谈进行记录、转录并载入 NVivo,然后使用初始和共识编码法进行编码。六次访谈后,主题达到饱和。 分析中出现了三个主题:(a) 实践模式的变化,(b) 影响临床实践的因素,(c) SLPs 认为需要促进其临床实践变化的项目。 尽管SLPs承认MBS复制婴儿典型喂养方式的重要性,但有些SLPs在喂养过程中一直采用侧卧位,却没有在MBS中评估侧卧位喂养。这种实践中的不一致性源于SLPs认为的障碍,包括缺乏经验、对跨学科冲突的担忧、对MBS协议的需求,以及缺乏有关侧卧位对吞咽潜在影响的研究。与会者表示需要进行研究,以确定侧卧位是否会改变或改善高危婴儿的吞咽功能和安全性(如气道保护)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信