Samuel López-Maza, Ariadna Gifreu, Elena Fonseca, Manuel Quintana, Estevo Santamarina, Laura Abraira, Daniel Campos, Manuel Toledo
{"title":"Efficacy of Perampanel in Nocturnal Seizures in Adult Patients with Epilepsy","authors":"Samuel López-Maza, Ariadna Gifreu, Elena Fonseca, Manuel Quintana, Estevo Santamarina, Laura Abraira, Daniel Campos, Manuel Toledo","doi":"10.1155/2024/5534808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Objective</i>. Nocturnal seizures are usually underestimated and represent a major problem in adult patients with epilepsy. Our aim was to study the effectiveness of perampanel for the treatment of nocturnal seizures in adult patients with epilepsy. <i>Methods</i>. Observational study of a prospectively acquired sample of adult patients with focal and generalized epilepsy in which perampanel was started from January to October 2021 in a specialized epilepsy unit in a tertiary hospital. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. All patients completed a follow-up period of at least 3 months. Seizure frequency during the 6-month period before the patient started treatment was obtained from medical records. Retention and responder rates (considered as a nocturnal seizure frequency reduction of ≥50%) and improvement of subjective sleep disturbances were analyzed as outcome measures. <i>Results</i>. Forty-eight patients were included (mean age 39.8 ± 17.4; 60.4% men), and 38 of them had a 6-month follow-up. Focal epilepsy was the most common diagnosis (81.3%), and most patients had a structural etiology (56.3%). Thirty-four (70.8%) patients had drug-resistant epilepsy. The mean nocturnal seizure frequency per month at baseline was 13.2 ± 35.9. Fifteen (31.3%) patients had subjective sleep disturbances at baseline, of which insomnia was the most frequent complaint (16.7%). Perampanel was started at a median dose of 4 mg/day (range = 2-14). At 3-month follow-up, the retention rate was 74.6%; 64.6% were considered responders (54.2% were seizure-free). Monthly nocturnal seizures decreased significantly at 3 months (8.2 ± 26.7 vs. 13.2 ± 35.9 seizures/month; <i>p</i> = 0.044) and 6 months (5.3 ± 18.2 vs. 13.2 ± 35.9 seizures/month; <i>p</i> = 0.006). Subjective sleep disturbances improved at 3-month follow-up (10.4% vs. 31.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.002) and 6-month follow-up (10.5% vs. 31.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.022). <i>Significance</i>. Perampanel can be a suitable treatment option in adult patients with both focal and generalized epilepsy with nocturnal seizures and can reduce the presence of sleep complaints.</p>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5534808","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective. Nocturnal seizures are usually underestimated and represent a major problem in adult patients with epilepsy. Our aim was to study the effectiveness of perampanel for the treatment of nocturnal seizures in adult patients with epilepsy. Methods. Observational study of a prospectively acquired sample of adult patients with focal and generalized epilepsy in which perampanel was started from January to October 2021 in a specialized epilepsy unit in a tertiary hospital. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. All patients completed a follow-up period of at least 3 months. Seizure frequency during the 6-month period before the patient started treatment was obtained from medical records. Retention and responder rates (considered as a nocturnal seizure frequency reduction of ≥50%) and improvement of subjective sleep disturbances were analyzed as outcome measures. Results. Forty-eight patients were included (mean age 39.8 ± 17.4; 60.4% men), and 38 of them had a 6-month follow-up. Focal epilepsy was the most common diagnosis (81.3%), and most patients had a structural etiology (56.3%). Thirty-four (70.8%) patients had drug-resistant epilepsy. The mean nocturnal seizure frequency per month at baseline was 13.2 ± 35.9. Fifteen (31.3%) patients had subjective sleep disturbances at baseline, of which insomnia was the most frequent complaint (16.7%). Perampanel was started at a median dose of 4 mg/day (range = 2-14). At 3-month follow-up, the retention rate was 74.6%; 64.6% were considered responders (54.2% were seizure-free). Monthly nocturnal seizures decreased significantly at 3 months (8.2 ± 26.7 vs. 13.2 ± 35.9 seizures/month; p = 0.044) and 6 months (5.3 ± 18.2 vs. 13.2 ± 35.9 seizures/month; p = 0.006). Subjective sleep disturbances improved at 3-month follow-up (10.4% vs. 31.3%; p = 0.002) and 6-month follow-up (10.5% vs. 31.3%; p = 0.022). Significance. Perampanel can be a suitable treatment option in adult patients with both focal and generalized epilepsy with nocturnal seizures and can reduce the presence of sleep complaints.
期刊介绍:
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.