Existential Democracy as a Model of Democracy for the Development of Human Personality. Part I. The Concept of Existential Democracy and Its Scientific, Philosophical Justification

A. Linde
{"title":"Existential Democracy as a Model of Democracy for the Development of Human Personality. Part I. The Concept of Existential Democracy and Its Scientific, Philosophical Justification","authors":"A. Linde","doi":"10.24158/pep.2024.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the development of an original model of democracy – existential democracy. Study consists of two parts. In the first part presented here are provided political scientific, sociological, as well as psychological and religious-philosophical justifications of existential democracy. One of the main innovations of existential democracy is a departure from only the pragmatic, utilitarian-functional understanding of democ-racy, directed at satisfying material needs alone and electing for this purpose an elite that satisfies these needs – a functioning state administration. Existential democracy addresses the goal of spiritual devel-opment and the achievement of the spiritual good of man – a goal that was originally postulated for the political process by Aristotle in “Politics”. This turns democracy to the problem of the development of the personality, the revelation of its true human, free and creative “I”, and not the “ego” embedded into the system. This corre-sponds to the interpretation of human not as just a bio-systemic organism, but as a spiritual transcendental be-ing striving for the meaning of his life, according to the humanistic psychology of Frankl, Fromm and others. These provisions seem especially actual now, during the advent of the postmodern era, consumer society and cybernetic regulation of human life.","PeriodicalId":507515,"journal":{"name":"Общество: политика, экономика, право","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Общество: политика, экономика, право","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2024.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the development of an original model of democracy – existential democracy. Study consists of two parts. In the first part presented here are provided political scientific, sociological, as well as psychological and religious-philosophical justifications of existential democracy. One of the main innovations of existential democracy is a departure from only the pragmatic, utilitarian-functional understanding of democ-racy, directed at satisfying material needs alone and electing for this purpose an elite that satisfies these needs – a functioning state administration. Existential democracy addresses the goal of spiritual devel-opment and the achievement of the spiritual good of man – a goal that was originally postulated for the political process by Aristotle in “Politics”. This turns democracy to the problem of the development of the personality, the revelation of its true human, free and creative “I”, and not the “ego” embedded into the system. This corre-sponds to the interpretation of human not as just a bio-systemic organism, but as a spiritual transcendental be-ing striving for the meaning of his life, according to the humanistic psychology of Frankl, Fromm and others. These provisions seem especially actual now, during the advent of the postmodern era, consumer society and cybernetic regulation of human life.
存在主义民主是促进人类个性发展的民主模式。第一部分:存在主义民主的概念及其科学和哲学依据
文章致力于发展一种新颖的民主模式--存在主义民主。研究包括两个部分。第一部分介绍了存在主义民主的政治科学、社会学、心理学和宗教哲学依据。存在主义民主的主要创新之一是摆脱了对民主制度的实用主义、功利主义和功能主义的理解,这种理解的目的仅仅是满足物质需求,并为此选举出满足这些需求的精英--一个正常运作的国家行政机构。存在主义民主所要解决的目标是精神发展和实现人类的精神之善--亚里士多德在《政治学》中最初为政治进程提出了这一目标。这就将民主转向了人格发展的问题,即揭示真正的人、自由和创造性的 "我",而不是嵌入制度中的 "自我"。这与弗兰克尔、弗洛姆等人的人本主义心理学的解释相吻合,即人不仅仅是一个生物系统有机体,而是一个追求生命意义的精神超越者。在后现代时代、消费社会和控制论对人类生活进行调节的今天,这些规定显得尤为现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信