Living with wildlife and associated conflicts in areas adjacent to protected areas, Northern Zimbabwe 津巴布韦北部毗邻保护区地区人兽共存及相关冲突的研究

Jeremiah Chakuya, Milcent Chikara, Edson Gandiwa
{"title":"Living with wildlife and associated conflicts in areas adjacent to protected areas, Northern Zimbabwe\n 津巴布韦北部毗邻保护区地区人兽共存及相关冲突的研究","authors":"Jeremiah Chakuya,&nbsp;Milcent Chikara,&nbsp;Edson Gandiwa","doi":"10.1002/inc3.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human–wildlife conflicts (HWCs) are a worldwide problem, especially around protected areas where human and wildlife needs overlap. This study focused on the Chundu communal area and the Nyamakate resettlement area in Northern Zimbabwe, with three primary objectives: (i) to identify problematic wildlife species frequently involved in HWC in these areas; (ii) to examine the temporal variations of HWC cases; and (iii) to assess the effectiveness of current and suggested mitigation measures for managing these conflicts. Data were collected in November 2019 and February 2020, periods identified as peak times for HWC in these areas. A comprehensive three-stage sampling design was used to collect data for this study. Data were collected through household questionnaires from 16 villages (64 households) in the Nyamakate resettlement area and nine villages (36 households) from the Chundu communal area. The study identified the spotted hyena (<i>Crocuta crocuta</i>) as the most problematic animal in livestock predation, followed by the African lion (<i>Panthera leo</i>) and leopard (<i>Panthera pardus</i>). There were no significant differences in HWC between the dry season (<i>M</i> = 315, SD = 417.79) and the wet season (<i>M</i> = 383, SD = 540.19; <i>t</i>[4] = −0.43, <i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The study concluded that HWC occurred throughout the year in both communities, unaffected by seasonal variations. It was determined that current mitigation measures are inadequate for managing HWC in both areas. In light of these findings, the study recommends the use of nonlethal methods in HWC management, reserving lethal means as a last resort.</p>","PeriodicalId":100680,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Conservation","volume":"3 1","pages":"12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/inc3.39","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inc3.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human–wildlife conflicts (HWCs) are a worldwide problem, especially around protected areas where human and wildlife needs overlap. This study focused on the Chundu communal area and the Nyamakate resettlement area in Northern Zimbabwe, with three primary objectives: (i) to identify problematic wildlife species frequently involved in HWC in these areas; (ii) to examine the temporal variations of HWC cases; and (iii) to assess the effectiveness of current and suggested mitigation measures for managing these conflicts. Data were collected in November 2019 and February 2020, periods identified as peak times for HWC in these areas. A comprehensive three-stage sampling design was used to collect data for this study. Data were collected through household questionnaires from 16 villages (64 households) in the Nyamakate resettlement area and nine villages (36 households) from the Chundu communal area. The study identified the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) as the most problematic animal in livestock predation, followed by the African lion (Panthera leo) and leopard (Panthera pardus). There were no significant differences in HWC between the dry season (M = 315, SD = 417.79) and the wet season (M = 383, SD = 540.19; t[4] = −0.43, p > 0.05). The study concluded that HWC occurred throughout the year in both communities, unaffected by seasonal variations. It was determined that current mitigation measures are inadequate for managing HWC in both areas. In light of these findings, the study recommends the use of nonlethal methods in HWC management, reserving lethal means as a last resort.

Abstract Image

津巴布韦北部保护区附近地区与野生动物的生活及相关冲突
人类与野生动物冲突(HWCs)是一个世界性问题,尤其是在人类与野生动物需求重叠的保护区周围。本研究重点关注津巴布韦北部的春都公社区和尼亚马凯特移民安置区,有三个主要目标:(i) 识别这些地区经常发生人与野生动物冲突的问题野生动物物种;(ii) 研究人与野生动物冲突案例的时间变化;(iii) 评估当前和建议的缓解措施对管理这些冲突的有效性。数据收集时间为 2019 年 11 月和 2020 年 2 月,这两个时间段被确定为这些地区 HWC 的高峰期。本研究采用了全面的三阶段抽样设计来收集数据。数据是通过家庭调查问卷收集的,调查对象包括尼亚马凯特(Nyamakate)安置区的 16 个村庄(64 户)和春都(Chundu)公社区的 9 个村庄(36 户)。研究发现,斑鬣狗(Crocuta crocuta)是捕食牲畜方面最棘手的动物,其次是非洲狮(Panthera leo)和豹(Panthera pardus)。旱季(M = 315,SD = 417.79)和雨季(M = 383,SD = 540.19;t[4] = -0.43,P > 0.05)之间的 HWC 没有明显差异。研究得出结论,HWC 在两个社区全年都有发生,不受季节变化的影响。研究认为,目前的缓解措施不足以管理这两个地区的 HWC。鉴于这些发现,研究建议在 HWC 管理中使用非致命方法,将致命手段作为最后手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信